C#

Alan Balkany wrote:

C# is a more modern language

Alan Balkany wrote:

which produces more reliable code.

Alan Balkany wrote:

It has a vast class library which reduces the amount of code you have to write

Alan Balkany wrote:

Development is faster in C#,

Alan Balkany wrote:

and it will be a requirement for many jobs for the foreseeable future.

Alan Balkany wrote:

Its a factor; not an absolute. You don't drive a Model T, do you?

Alan Balkany wrote:

Have to disagree here; it's much less likely to have certain types of errors in C#, such as undetected buffer overruns. If the only factor is people, why is development in assembly language so slow? The tools you use make a big difference.

Alan Balkany wrote:

Locating and integrating them increases the amount of work you have to do to get a solution.

Alan Balkany wrote:

There's no guarantee of mutual compatibility or any minimum level of reliability with a library from an unknown source.

Alan Balkany wrote:

Then there's the versioning problem that's greatly reduced when all the libraries are integrated with the language release.

Alan Balkany wrote:

I think use of C# will increase, while use of C++ will decrease in the coming years. C# is a better bet at this point, in my opinion.

Software2007 wrote:

Are you saying learning C# is a disadvantage?

public abstract class MyPageBase : System.Web.UI.Page {
  /* common code for all pages */
}

public partial class DefaultPage : MyPageBase {
  /* Will now have all of common code from MyPageBase */
}

IList<T> Intersection<T>(ICollection<T> one, ICollection<T> two){
 IList<T> r = new List<T>();
 foreach(T t in one)
  if(two.Contains(t)) r.Add(t);
 return r;
}

SqlConnection conn = new SqlConnection(ConnString);
SqlDataAdapter da = new SqlDataAdapter(query, ConnString);

SqlConnection conn = new SqlConnection(ConnString);
conn.open;
SqlDataAdapter da = new SqlDataAdapter(query, conn);

overloaded Name wrote:

but does not show data either.