|
They are called "snippets" and intellisence will show you those that are available. You can also create your own.
|
|
|
|
|
Have a look at the following MS VS2005 Code Snippets[^] You will pretty much find a snippet in this collection for all your needs.
|
|
|
|
|
Hey guys and girls, I have a question that might sound stupid, but
I cant find a solution to it, so I am asking you.
I want to name my variables on the fly, meaning, I only know in the middle of the run, how
many variables to create and therefor I want to run inside a loop and create in each iteration,
a new variable with a different name.
example:
foreach (long EUI in EUIarray)
{
List<Object> EUI = new List<Object>();
}
Imagen that I want to create in each iteration EUI_1, EUI_2 etc.
thanks for your help 
|
|
|
|
|
I'm pretty sure you can't, but why would you need to do that? Whats wrong with just using an array?
My current favourite word is: Waffle
Cheese is still good though.
|
|
|
|
|
I am trying to create a few arrays, not just one.
I have some data in a buffer. this data belongs to different hardware units.
I want to create a separate array for each unit so I can later on approach this relevant data.
Any way I really need to be able to name these array's on the fly, like in my post
because I don't know how many I need from the start.
Maybe there is some way to append a number to the variable name(I know it sounds odd).
if not, maybe another suggestion that gives me the same result in the end of the day.
I need to have a different array of data for each unit so I can create a separate graph for each.
|
|
|
|
|
Can't be done. As someone else said, create a list of lists, if that's what you want.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
"I am working on a project that will convert a FORTRAN code to corresponding C++ code.I am not aware of FORTRAN syntax" ( spotted in the C++/CLI forum )
|
|
|
|
|
but a list of lists don't do the trick since i need to identify my relevant list by
the EUI number, and the list it self holds object type(referencing an internal type).
they cant sit in the same array.
I need a solution in which I can access the relevant list for a specific EUI.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I'm sorry, but what you want to do, can't be done reasonably. The usual way around this is to create a dictionary, whch allows you to specify names by which to find your associated items, which are presumably lists. However, given that the names are being made up anyhow, I don't see any benefit in not using the index you intended to make a suffix as an index into an array directly.
If the EUI number is not just a sequence, if it could be any number, then a dictonary solves that problem.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
"I am working on a project that will convert a FORTRAN code to corresponding C++ code.I am not aware of FORTRAN syntax" ( spotted in the C++/CLI forum )
|
|
|
|
|
that's right you understand me, the EUI is a long type number, and it's not just a sequence.
this dictionary you are talking about I am not quite familiar with it.
I will take up some reading about the dictionary.
thank you very much.
|
|
|
|
|
A dictionary is an associative container. So, you define two types, one is the type of the key, the other is the type of the value. I'm imagining something like this:
Dictionary<int, List<Object>>
Then, the trick is, you can look up your list like this:
List<Object> items = myDict[EUI];
The main thing is, when you add your first item for a given EUI, that is, when you're adding and the key does not exist, you need to do this:
myDict[EUI] = new List<Object>()
as it will start as null. Then you can add items like this:
myDict[EUI].Add(item);
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
"I am working on a project that will convert a FORTRAN code to corresponding C++ code.I am not aware of FORTRAN syntax" ( spotted in the C++/CLI forum )
|
|
|
|
|
I have this Access Hyperlink field bound, (which I tried as a text field), to a DataList as follows…
asp:DataList ID="DataList1" runat="server" DataSourceID="AWAccessDataSource" DataKeyField="ID">
ItemTemplate>
asp:HyperLink ID="HyperLink1" runat="server" Text='<%# Eval("SiteName") %>' NavigateUrl='<%# Eval("Weblink") %>'>/asp:HyperLink>
/ItemTemplate>
(* some of the <'s are intentionally mising to get this to show up, pre tags made it look even worse)
The link it produces on the webpage is preceded by the local server URL..
Example:
http://localhost/AutumnWoodsAJAX/HomesForSale.aspx#http://www.delmars.com/flwtrip/ada,s,.htm#
Same is true for my host site…
http://www.autwoods.com/HomesForSale.aspx#http://www.delmars.com/flwtrip/ada,s,.htm#
I also tried…
<asp:hyperlink id="HyperLink1" runat="server" text="<%# Eval("SiteName") %>" navigateurl="<%# DataBinder.Eval(Container.DataItem, "Weblink")%>">
Checked for Hyperlink properties, etc., nothing apparently useful there.
Then I tried to do some stripping with a function…
<asp:hyperlink id="HyperLink1" runat="server" text="<%# Eval("SiteName") %>" navigateurl="<%# StripLocal(Eval("Weblink")) %>">
protected string StripLocal(object URL)
{
this.TextBox1.Text = URL.ToString();// which displays #http://www.delmars.com/flwtrip/roberts.htm#
return (string)URL; // which displays #http://www.delmars.com/flwtrip/roberts.htm#
}
So the preceding host link isn’t showing up in the function and still even after the return value the link rendered on the page has the local host link preceding the actual link. Anyone tell me what’s up with this wonkieness?
|
|
|
|
|
I was able to make this work by changing the Access datatype from Hyperlink to Text, which was inserting the before and after # symbols. In my DataList I put...
asp:HyperLink runat="server" NavigateUrl ='<%# DataBinder.Eval(Container.DataItem, "Weblink").ToString()%>' ID="Hyperlink2">
%#DataBinder.Eval(Container.DataItem, "SiteName")%> </asp:HyperLink>
Some Syntax is intentionally missing so it shows up on this forum, <'s are missing
|
|
|
|
|
I know how to close a form, but how do you close the MAIN form? An example is, you have a form start the program with Application.Run(Form2);, and then you have a button on Form2 (Form1 is the main form) that closes the main/and or all forms in the project. I hope it wasn't THAT confusing; thanks in advance.
The most knowledge doesn't mean the most wise...
|
|
|
|
|
Form1.Close();. Application.Exit();
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks... But I ust got another question. How do you make it so when you hit the little X at the top right that everything closes?
The most knowledge doesn't mean the most wise...
|
|
|
|
|
If that's the main form then it will automatically start the close process. If you want to do special things with child forms, you can hook into the main forms Closing event and fire off processing in the open child forms before they are closed. For instance, you could check the child forms to see if anything needs saving.
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not that advanced yet... Internet and I/O have got a while... Isn't there like a FormClosing event or something? Can I close all there?
The most knowledge doesn't mean the most wise...
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, yes there is. Thanks for the advice; ... ... another one bites the dust...
(That means I got it...)
The most knowledge doesn't mean the most wise...
|
|
|
|
|
Not a problem. That's why we're here. Although I'm now about to not be here - logging off for the night that is. Good luck with the rest of your project.
BTW - your questions are getting better.
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Try form1.Closing()
you can implement it on all the forms, there you can call Application.Exit();
|
|
|
|
|
i need to know how made a macro recorder?
i want to move the mouse cursor and click on a textBox and enter a value and so click on button!!
but computer must do this! not user!
how?
Imposible is Imposible...
|
|
|
|
|
Do you want the user to record a macro, or should the application just run a pre-recorded macro?
Virtual1ty
"Any fool can learn from his own mistakes, but a wise man learns from mistakes of others"
|
|
|
|
|
mmm...
i want the program runs the macro! but i don't know what is the macro really?
Imposible is Imposible...
|
|
|
|
|
A macro is a set of instructions, that makes the app do something.
A macro can basically do everything - move the mouse cursor, type some text,
open other programs etc.
I don't know to make a macro recorder, but I know what you can do, if the app just should do the same thing every time:
Simply just hard code the "macro", so it runs everytime the application is executed. It can take some time, but it works.
Virtual1ty
"Any fool can learn from his own mistakes, but a wise man learns from mistakes of others"
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
;);P