|
Nomadico wrote: very small program
What metric are you using to define "very small program"?
Nomadico wrote: 75 % complete already
Is that just development? Or does that include testing too? And how are you measuring completeness?
Nomadico wrote: not ridiculous price but pays well for work need
Since you posted this in the C# forum, I'll assume it is a C# program you want written. Also, since your email address is from the UK, I'll assume you are paying UK prices.
Currenlty, the UK average for C# developers on a freelance basis is £37 per hour. Therefore if you "pay well" you will have to beat the average. Are you willing to pay that?
|
|
|
|
|
Colin Angus Mackay wrote: Currenlty, the UK average for C# developers on a freelance basis is £37 per hour. Therefore if you "pay well" you will have to beat the average. Are you willing to pay that?
ROTFL !!!! yeah, he doesn't have money to post a job ad, but he's paying well.
Of course, I know you know this.
Christian Graus
Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.
|
|
|
|
|
Nomadico wrote: Need to 'hire' a programmer
I know what it means to hire someone, but what does it mean to "hire" someone? I don't know if I would want to be "hired"...
Nomadico wrote: 75 % complete already
Which means that about 150% of the work is left... 50% to understand the current code, 50% to remove what's wrong in it, and 50% to complete what left of it...
Despite everything, the person most likely to be fooling you next is yourself.
|
|
|
|
|
<quote>Which means that about 150% of the work is left... 50% to understand the current code, 50% to remove what's wrong in it, and 50% to complete what left of it...
thats right
TVMU^P[[IGIOQHG^JSH`A#@`RFJ\c^JPL>;"[,*/|+&WLEZGc`AFXc!L
%^]*IRXD#@GKCQ`R\^SF_WcHbORY87֦ʻ6ϣN8ȤBcRAV\Z^&SU~%CSWQ@#2
W_AD`EPABIKRDFVS)EVLQK)JKSQXUFYK[M`UKs*$GwU#(QDXBER@CBN%
Rs0~53%eYrd8mt^7Z6]iTF+(EWfJ9zaK-iTV.C\y<pjxsg-b$f4ia>
--------------------------------------------------------
128 bit encrypted signature, crack if you can
|
|
|
|
|
Me me 'hire' me. I'm a tart - erm contractor, hire me.
Send me the existing source and the requirement specs and I'll get right to it.
Be prepared to deposit $3000 US for me to asses the requirements (told you I was a tart) and I'll supply an estimate for the completion of the job.
Or - use the job board or rentacoder.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Mycroft Holmes wrote: I'm a tart
You slag.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi! How I can get the value of <fullname> programatically in a code-behind file and put in a label. I have declared in the web.config a statement:
profile
properties
add name="FullName" defaultValue="Anonymous" allowAnonymous="true"
properties
profile
now I want to get the value of the FullName in the code-behind file?
so the LabelName.Text = ???
Thx, Laziale
|
|
|
|
|
I guess you've got the wrong forum, try ASP.Net forum instead
Regards,
Lev
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
I have a 32-bit process that presents the user a dialog box similar to Regedit. On 64-bit OSes, because of registry redirection, when I attempt to read something under HKLM\SOFTWARE, the OS transparently provides my app with the data that appears under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node. That's great and all...
However, since my app is 32-bit, any data that has been written to HKLM\SOFTWARE by a 64-bit app is not visible to me.
Whether I set the path to read as HKLM\SOFTWARE or HKLM\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node yields the same results--I'm only seeing the values that appear under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node.
My app has the ability to connect to the registry across the network--if I'm on a 32-bit OS and remotely access the registry of a 64-bit machine, then I'm seeing both branches just as Regedit would show them (since registry redirection does not work across machine boundaries, I'm getting the "raw view").
Compiling my app as 64-bit (or AnyCPU) is not an option right now, because my app also relies on third-party components that are only available as 32-bit.
So...how can a 32-bit app, running on a 64-bit OS, access the data under the "real" HKLM\SOFTWARE? Read-only would be fine--I just need the data to be visible...
PS - I'm aware of the KEY_WOW64_64KEY and KEY_WOW64_32KEY flags...however, I'm not seeing any provisions in .NET's registry classes to specify them...do I really have to rewrite my existing code to use P/Invoke??
modified on Saturday, December 13, 2008 11:59 AM
|
|
|
|
|
The following info is from MSDN:
By default, a 32-bit application running on WOW64 accesses the 32-bit registry view and a 64-bit application accesses the 64-bit registry view. The following flags enable 32-bit applications to access reflected keys in the 64-bit registry view and 64-bit applications to access reflected keys in the 32-bit registry view.
Flag name Value Description
KEY_WOW64_64KEY 0x0100 Access a 64-bit key from either a 32-bit or 64-bit application.
Windows 2000: This flag is not supported.
KEY_WOW64_32KEY 0x0200 Access a 32-bit key from either a 32-bit or 64-bit application.
Windows 2000: This flag is not supported.
These flags can be specified in the samDesired parameter of the following registry functions:
RegCreateKeyEx
RegDeleteKeyEx
RegOpenKeyEx
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel Desormeaux wrote: do I really have to rewrite my existing code to use P/Invoke??
Yes.
|
|
|
|
|
Amazing. I'd love to understand MS's reasoning.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello All,
I'm developing a distributed data processing system that requires frequent synchronization of a large file base (~4 GB in approx. 40000 files) among 10 or more workstations. The master file base is created on one of the workstations, and has to be distributed to the other ones over a local network.
To avoid a bottleneck of simultaneous downloading files from a single workstation, I would like to create a peer-to-peer protocol that would allow redirecting the download request received by the master workstation to another workstation which has already downloaded a given file.
Which technology of those available in the .NET Framework should I employ for that purpose?
|
|
|
|
|
Have a look at Windows Communication Foundation (WCF).
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I was wondering how i could prevent empty cells when the user adds a new row in the datagridview?
Because the gridview is bouned to an sql database, some fields are not allowed to stay empty.
Any idea how to get this trick done?
Thanks in advance!
|
|
|
|
|
Just add validation, check if the cells are empty before doing a save, and if they are, tell them to fix them.
Christian Graus
Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.
|
|
|
|
|
How can I return value from a thread??
Thanks in advance
Anvesh
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
there are many ways you can pass data to a thread, and retrieve results.
For one, there is a possibility to pass an object to Thread.Start(); so you could store all the inputs in that object before you start the thread, and/or retrieve all the results once the thread is done.
Or you could turn that around, and have a little class (say class Job), which you instantiate, pass parameters (thru properties maybe), then call its Run method (which launches a thread inside that class, invisible to the outside world), and finally gets the results available somehow (e.g. again as Properties). This is my preferred way; it makes it very easy to run several similar jobs at the same time, just by instatiating more Job objects and Run()ning them.
|
|
|
|
|
You can use the class BackGroundWorker and handle the completed event and getting the property "Result" of the event args
Saludos!!
____Juan
|
|
|
|
|
I want to create a key to my application. When installed at client for the first time it should install. If the client want to install again it should not install.And if the client want to copy the setup file it should not be copied to any other location.
|
|
|
|
|
Unless your application "phones home" to a license server on your end, there's no way to stop this from happening. A client will be able to install your app as many times as they want.
|
|
|
|
|
Hey
I want to inject DLL made in C# into an Application.
Ive been looking for this for a long time, but still cant find the answer.
In C you would use it like this
BOOL WINAPI DllMain(HINSTANCE hinstDLL, DWORD fdwReason, LPVOID lpvReserved)
{
switch (fdwReason)
{
case DLL_PROCESS_ATTACH:
MessageBox(0, "Test", "Test", MB_OK);
break;
case DLL_PROCESS_DETACH:
break;
case DLL_THREAD_ATTACH:
break;
case DLL_THREAD_DETACH:
break;
}
return TRUE;
}
Is there a way to do this in C#? Like when I inject it, that it also shows the MessageBox at successfull injection?
Thanks in Advance
- opx
|
|
|
|
|
LoadLibrary[^] will call DllMain for you, so you can use P/Invoke for that task.
regards
modified 12-Sep-18 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for your kind reply, but I still dont get it.
Im not really familiar with LoadLibrary...
This is what I got so far
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Text;
using System.Runtime.InteropServices;
namespace MyDll
{
public class clsMain
{
[DllImport("kernel32.dll")]
public static extern IntPtr LoadLibrary(string lpFileName);
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
So did you actually call the method?
LoadLibrary("YourDll.dll");
if this returns some value != IntPtr.Zero then the call was successful.
regards
modified 12-Sep-18 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|