|
You and 1% of other PC users (basically the masochists who've spent so long being popuped to death by ZoneAlarm that they never even noticed the new UAC popups). *shudder*
It is a truth universally acknowledged that a zombie in possession of brains must be in want of more brains.
-- Pride and Prejudice and Zombies
|
|
|
|
|
AVG doesn't annoy though, IMO.
Of course M$ can't do it right, but that doesn't necessarily mean that no one can, right?
|
|
|
|
|
IF you're talking about the anti virus software, AVG only prompts when it blocks something. Hopefully you encounter trojan web pages/email much less frequently than you install applications or reconfigure your OS.
It is a truth universally acknowledged that a zombie in possession of brains must be in want of more brains.
-- Pride and Prejudice and Zombies
|
|
|
|
|
Actually, no. Maybe I just frequent the wrong places on the 'net, but I get plenty of warnings from my trusty ol' AVG
More often than I install something probably, most programs don't need installing.
Anyhow, they could fix UAC for the biggest part with one small fix: a checkbox "Remember this choice for this application"
|
|
|
|
|
harold aptroot wrote: Actually, no. Maybe I just frequent the wrong places on the 'net, but I get plenty of warnings from my trusty ol' AVG
That or maybe AVG's gotten considerably more noisy since I last used it 5(?) years ago. I maybe see an avast warning once a quarter, I get a UAC prompt once a week after installing all my base apps.
It is a truth universally acknowledged that a zombie in possession of brains must be in want of more brains.
-- Pride and Prejudice and Zombies
|
|
|
|
|
Oh I don't know, I never get UAC prompts
(XP)
|
|
|
|
|
*biff*biff*biff*biff*biff*biff*biff*biff*
It is a truth universally acknowledged that a zombie in possession of brains must be in want of more brains.
-- Pride and Prejudice and Zombies
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps. Then again it doesn't seem that bad:
- Run Fx for the first time
- Get a prompt. "This program doesn't have the necessary permissions to access the Internet. Do you want to grant the permissions this once, or permanently"
- If the permanently option is selected, always give Fx permissions. Otherwise, just do it this once
Maybe add the option to always grant the necessary permissions to software made by the manufacturer
The only people this should annoy are the people who don't read dialog boxes anyway, and don't notice the 'permanently' option. Prevent Weven being booted from anything other than a command prompt and you solve that
Between the idea
And the reality
Between the motion
And the act
Falls the Shadow
|
|
|
|
|
You might as well use ExitWindowsEx()[^] with EWX_POWEROFF flag.
Yes, it isn't a function from the .NET library; but you could use p/Invoke.
It is a crappy thing, but it's life -^ Carlo Pallini
|
|
|
|
|
I want to ask some question about vb.net and c# . I had created dll file that write in vb language and I want to used in c# project Its possible or not if I do that!
thank you for all that give some advice me !!!
|
|
|
|
|
Yes it is possible. Once its compiled it does not matter if it is in VB.Net or C#.Net you will still be able to make use of its functions from within another class. Just make sure you reference the DLL correctly.
Life goes very fast. Tomorrow, today is already yesterday.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, like musefan said, it's possible
But, I'm wondering.. why didn't you just go ahead and try it?
|
|
|
|
|
Though, you have already been answered. It would be nice to read a bit about this[^].
Manas Bhardwaj
Please remember to rate helpful or unhelpful answers, it lets us and people reading the forums know if our answers are any good.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the question is answered. But I'll try to add more pointers.
Your query can come into picture only when the DLL was written in a native language, but needs to be consumed from within a managed language (or the plain old VB thing) AND which Calling Conventions[^] were used to export the functions from within the DLL.
While you write a DLL with any of those managed languages (or the plain old VB), it is always a COM DLL (You cannot write a Win32 DLL with VB, but you can write a COM DLL with C/C++).
It is a crappy thing, but it's life -^ Carlo Pallini
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Experts
I am working with sql server 2005 and visual studio 2005.i have a table having 10 fields and 2000000(above then 2 lakes record) first time when i fill the gird with
these record it takes so much time. i am using data table as data source in ADO.NEt.
and Then filter further records using row filter it also take time.
please suggest me how i can improve my performance so featch record fast as possible as possible.
Thanku
Dinesh
|
|
|
|
|
Sharma Dinesh Kumar wrote: Then filter further records using row filter it also take time
Use the WHERE clause in the SQL itself. It would trip the the number of rows returned.
Sharma Dinesh Kumar wrote: please suggest me how i can improve my performance so featch record fast as possible as possible.
Are you really displaying the 2000000 all at once?
If not, use the paging instead and get the number of rows from the SQL on each page change.
Manas Bhardwaj
Please remember to rate helpful or unhelpful answers, it lets us and people reading the forums know if our answers are any good.
|
|
|
|
|
Just to expand on the other post, loading 2 million records will take some time, paging would be your best bet to improve performance for loading, but for filtering 2 million records I don't see how to improve that bottleneck...
|
|
|
|
|
What possible use to an application user would there be of showing 2 million records? Do you ever go past page 5 on, say, search results at google?
Display what the user wants to see, not everything in the database and expect the user to trawl through hundreds of pages looking for the record he/she wants.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
iTextSharp (.NET) and libHaru (native language) comes to my mind. But I'm not sure if they allow you to extract "specific data" from a PDF file. You might be able to extract the whole contents of the file and you can create a text file out of this extracted data.
It is a crappy thing, but it's life -^ Carlo Pallini
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Rajesh,
Thanks for the info.
Kind regards,
The only programmers that are better C# programmers, are those who look like this -> |
Programm3r
My Blog: ^_^
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
I have two projects, A and B. A is referencing B. And I want to compile programmatically in the project A the referenced project B to a DLL-File.
How can I do that?
-Haris
|
|
|
|
|
By deploying the command line compiler, and running it with Process.Start, I guess. Why do you want to do that ? I'm not sure what changes you can make to the dll and have your reference still work.
Christian Graus
Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.
"! i don't exactly like or do programming and it only gives me a headache." - spotted in VB forums.
I can do things with my brain that I can't even google. I can flex the front part of my brain instantly anytime I want. It can be exhausting and it even causes me vision problems for some reason. - CaptainSeeSharp
|
|
|
|
|
Wow! Thanks for that fast answer!
Hm, could you explain that more detailed, because I am kind of a newbie in all that compiling stuff...
I am part of a team and my part is to compile this DLL, based on the interface definition
|
|
|
|