|
Stephen Hewitt wrote: there's no question mark.
It's encrypted.
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
|
|
|
|
|
I think it's not encrypted. Probably it could be in different language. 
- Malli...! ![Rose | [Rose]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
No its plain English, but typed with a 'Dvorak' keybord layout.
See Lounge: Dvorak Keyboard[^]
Learn from the mistakes of others, you may not live long enough to make them all yourself.
|
|
|
|
|
CPallini wrote: It's encrypted
And urgent!!
|
|
|
|
|
Of course.
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
|
|
|
|
|
We are luck that you are here to discover these secrets.
|
|
|
|
|
Well said.
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
|
|
|
|
|
hi... I am not able to understand your question or joke or whatever it is.
any way I think you are in a very funny mood.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
Thanks for all your replies
But I just got a new internet connection at home beacuse my earlier one was not able to send message to codeproject which really bugged me.I tried to send this message since I had nothing on my mind immediately.
Today I was more than happy since I could send the message after a long time from home and got all these replies in return.
Thanks for all the help you people offer.
|
|
|
|
|
So you thought posting a useless piece of trash was the best option? You could have at least made a comment in the lounge so you didn't look like a fool.
|
|
|
|
|
what about testing it in your own blog at your profile page?
|
|
|
|
|
Why you couldnt did you get any message when you wanted to post messages?
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
When I used to post the message the site would not be connected and the message did not get posted.
The problem was only for codeproject otherwise yahoo,gmail would work.
Pritha
|
|
|
|
|
But it seems that you dont have problem now and I think its good news for you.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
I have a compiled dll (compiled by Marshall Soft lets call it m.dll) and then I have the code that compiled the m.dll (cpp,h,def). So then I compile the code to create a new dll(lets call it n.dll), I then view n.dll in Dependcy Walker all the functions being exported is there. The same happens when I perform the action with m.dll, but with the exception that the top panel shows additional functions.
Why is that, it is the same code but Dependcy Walker shows additional functions in the top panel. Is there settings one must set within Visual Studio ??
I hope this makes sense...
Regards,
The only programmers that are better that C programmers are those who code in 1's and 0's ![Green Alien | [Alien]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/alien.gif)
Programm3r
My Blog: ^_^
|
|
|
|
|
Programm3r wrote: Why is that, it is the same code but Dependcy Walker shows additional functions in the top panel.
Are talking about the Parent Import Function List View? See Dependecy Walker help for explanations.
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the reply. I'll browse the CHM file.
Regards,
The only programmers that are better that C programmers are those who code in 1's and 0's
Programm3r
My Blog: ^_^
|
|
|
|
|
It's difficult to say without seing any code. It could be for example that some of the functions are exported when a specific macro is defined (something like #ifdef EXPORT_FUNCTION). This macro could be defined in the project settings rather than in a source file. Check for that.
You could also post the header file which contains the declaration of the functions which are missing when you build the dll. This will already help to start looking more into details.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the reply Cédric,
Just a bit of the code:
#ifdef STATIC_LIBRARY
#define DLL_IMPORT_EXPORT
#else
#ifdef WIN32
#ifdef DLL_SOURCE_CODE
#define DLL_IMPORT_EXPORT __declspec(dllexport) __stdcall
#else
#define DLL_IMPORT_EXPORT __declspec(dllimport) __stdcall
#endif
#else
#define DLL_IMPORT_EXPORT FAR PASCAL
#endif
#endif
#ifdef __cplusplus
#define NoMangle extern "C"
#else
#define NoMangle
#endif
NoMangle int DLL_IMPORT_EXPORT foo(int,unsigned);
NoMangle int DLL_IMPORT_EXPORT foo(int Parm, unsigned Len)
{
...
}
LIBRARY TEST
DESCRIPTION 'Just testing some stuff'
CODE PRELOAD MOVEABLE DISCARDABLE
DATA PRELOAD MOVEABLE SINGLE
HEAPSIZE 1024
EXPORTS foo @1
Thanks again for the other advice, I'll see what I can do.
Regards,
The only programmers that are better that C programmers are those who code in 1's and 0's
Programm3r
My Blog: ^_^
|
|
|
|
|
Try adding DLL_SOURCE_CODE as a preprocessor definition (in your project settings -> C/C++ -> Preprocessor). See if that fixes the problem.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the help Cédric.
Regards,
The only programmers that are better that C programmers are those who code in 1's and 0's
Programm3r
My Blog: ^_^
|
|
|
|
|
Hi everybody,
is it possible to detect a mouseclick outside a modal dialog in a MDI?
I tried already:
Mouse-Click on MainFrame
KillFocus of the dialog (works only if i click outside the mainframe window(selection of another application)
But i need also to detect the mouse-click if i click outside the dialog and inside the mainframe
Does any one has an idea?
Big thanks in advance
|
|
|
|
|
You need to capture the mouse, then it will work.
Christian Graus
Please read this if you don't understand the answer I've given you
"also I don't think "TranslateOneToTwoBillion OneHundredAndFortySevenMillion FourHundredAndEightyThreeThousand SixHundredAndFortySeven()" is a very good choice for a function name" - SpacixOne ( offering help to someone who really needed it ) ( spaces added for the benefit of people running at < 1280x1024 )
|
|
|
|
|
Works fine, thanks for your help
|
|
|
|
|
I want to open an existing file without checking the file extension because this changes sometimes. In DOS (and windows) you can add an asterix (*) and all files with the same name are shown.
The file is opened with the FileCreate command:
<br />
sprintf(FileName,"%s%s.%s",readloc,ProdBest,ext);<br />
hFile = CreateFile(FileName,GENERIC_READ|GENERIC_WRITE,0,0,OPEN_EXISTING,0,0);
readloc is defined as: c:\\ProdIn\\, ext the file extension. these are defined in an INI file
ProdBest is the filename to be searched
if I define the ext as a txt file it works perfect, but if I change the extension to * I get error 123 (ERROR_INVALID_NAME)?
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
