|
Nish - Native CPian wrote:
in which case they'd power-off and reboot anyway
I was actually wondering whether it is possible for my process to survive after power-off and reboot....
Best regards,
Alexandru Savescu
|
|
|
|
|
Alexpro wrote:
I was actually wondering whether it is possible for my process to survive after power-off and reboot....
Heheheh. Good one Alex
Author of the romantic comedy
Summer Love and Some more Cricket [New Win]
Buy it, read it and admire me
|
|
|
|
|
Nish - Native CPian wrote:
You really cannot prevent a process from being killed!
Sure you can. Just create a (D?)COM server that never returns from a call. That hangs the machine (at least NT's) to the point that the only way you can stop the process is the reset-button or a power cycle. Easy as pie. There are a number of other techniques also, but this is the easiest to implement I think.
|
|
|
|
|
Why would you want to, apart from being a pain in the neck ?
Christian
I am completely intolerant of stupidity. Stupidity is, of course, anything that doesn't conform to my way of thinking. - Jamie Hale - 29/05/2002
|
|
|
|
|
Christian Graus wrote:
Why would you want to, apart from being a pain in the neck ?
CG, I've said this many times before. But I believe there is some strong underground campaign to bring out an annoyance kit which includes stuff like this 
Nish
Author of the romantic comedy
Summer Love and Some more Cricket [New Win]
Buy it, read it and admire me
|
|
|
|
|
Christian Graus wrote:
pain in the neck
LOL CG!
neck, eh?
I bet that's the first time you had to say 'neck' after 'pain in the'
Author of the romantic comedy
Summer Love and Some more Cricket [New Win]
Buy it, read it and admire me
|
|
|
|
|
GREETINGS!
I think, you can.
1) Just make a timer and watch the Shutdown.exe . When it is loading just kill it.
2) Write the program "Shutdown.exe" and replace the original.
Good luck!
LOVE & PEACE to everyone
|
|
|
|
|
SAV wrote:
LOVE & PEACE to everyone
Your answer will not bring peace to everyone atleast it will be painful for those who can't shutdown their system.
|
|
|
|
|
Kill him before!
"Nelle cose del mondo non e' il sapere ma il volere che puo'."
|
|
|
|
|
Hi.
Is it possible to incorporate a link in an edit view? For example, let say the program displays this line:
-----
Here is a link to Google: www.google.com
-----
Okay. I would like it such that the user can click on part of the line "www...com" and the program can do things such as open a the default web browser or open a dialog box. What is the best way to incorporate a link type of feature in a CEditView?
Thanks,
Kuphryn
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think this is possible with CEditView (at least without alot of work.) However, CRichEditView can do this. I can't remember the exact flag you have to set, but I'm pretty sure there is one.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks.
I was afraid of this even before I posted. I have put a lot of work into the program using CEditView. I am not sure how much time I will take going from CEditView to CRichEditView.
Kuphryn
|
|
|
|
|
You could try putting a static control on top of the edit control and putting the link text in the static control. And handle the mouse click.
Nish
Author of the romantic comedy
Summer Love and Some more Cricket [New Win]
Buy it, read it and admire me
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks.
I will look at adding a static control.
Kuphryn
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know how you can do it in a CEditView. In a CRichEditView you need to process the EN_LINK message.
Best regards,
Alexandru Savescu
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I'm looking for the online tutorial and sample code about how to implement threading through unix pipe facility instead of pThread. (in C++ or C programming)
Does anyone know where i can find a good resource in these areas? Does anyone know what is pipe and how to use it???
Thanks!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From MoveWindow Help:
For a top-level window, the position and dimensions are relative to the upper-left corner of the screen. For a child window, they are relative to the upper-left corner of the parent window's client area.
|
|
|
|
|
I want to have an assignment operator in a class that I have several classes derived from. I want to be able to call the assignment operator using an object defined as a pointer to the base class but have it execute the code in the proper derived class.
I don't know if I explained it very well so here's a little bit of code:
CElement* pTempElement;
pTempElement = pElement;
where pElement is a pointer to a class that was derived from the CElement base class.
My goal is to be able to get the data from pElement to pTempElement but not share the memory address. If there's an easier way than I'm working on, that's fine too. Probably a stupid question but I've always had a bit of a mental block when it comes to pointers.
|
|
|
|
|
Override new operator instead?
Michel
It is a lovely language, but it takes a very long time to say anything in it, because we do not say anything in it, unless it is worth taking a very long time to say, and to listen to.
- TreeBeard
|
|
|
|
|
You need to dereference the objects;
CElement* pTempElement;
*pTempElement = *pElement;
Christian
I am completely intolerant of stupidity. Stupidity is, of course, anything that doesn't conform to my way of thinking. - Jamie Hale - 29/05/2002
|
|
|
|
|
Using operator= is not a good idea, since the version for the base class will be used instead of that of the actual type pointed to by pElement. The standard idiom to handle this situation (which is fairly common) is to define a virtual function clone just like this:
class CElement
{
...
virtual CElement* clone()=0;
};Then in every derived class you just write:
class CDerivedElement
{
...
virtual CElement* clone()
{
return new CDerivedElement(*this);
}
}so that your program can copy objects like this:
CElement* pTempElement;
pTempElement=pElement->clone(); Remember to declare ~CElement as virtual. Good luck.
Joaquín M López Muñoz
Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo
|
|
|
|
|
I have a MDI application that the CRichEditView (from which I can get the CRichEditCtrl object). How do I insert lines of text programmatically? And can I do it line by line?
tx
Michel
It is a lovely language, but it takes a very long time to say anything in it, because we do not say anything in it, unless it is worth taking a very long time to say, and to listen to.
- TreeBeard
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
