|
They use an ActiveX or Java control. Are you the same guy who was asking about Orkut stuff the other day ?
Christian Graus
No longer a Microsoft MVP, but still happy to answer your questions.
|
|
|
|
|
No I am not that person.
Now I dont think they are using Active X as I have seen that to be working on Mozilla. ActiveX is not supported to Mozilla.
Regarding JAVA, is it javascript. If it is with javascript, I am eagar to know the process.
I dont think they are using Applets.
Please let me know the solution to create one like this.
Waiting for your answer
Abhishek Sur
|
|
|
|
|
no one replied... till now.. waiting for replies friends...
Abhishek Sur
|
|
|
|
|
How could i get a freelance job ?
|
|
|
|
|
Do you Think this is the right place to ask this question.Search on google.You'll get a lot. 
Cheers!!
Brij
|
|
|
|
|
i searchd but cud'nt get the right link
|
|
|
|
|
Try spelling the words correctly.
Blog link to be reinstated at a later date.
|
|
|
|
|
Improper spelling is a definite bad start for him 
"The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
"Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon
"Not only do you continue to babble nonsense, you can't even correctly remember the nonsense you babbled just minutes ago." - Rob Graham
|
|
|
|
|
Depends. Where are you, how much experience do you have ?
Christian Graus
No longer a Microsoft MVP, but still happy to answer your questions.
|
|
|
|
|
This is not the right place to ask such question.
Reasons are not Important but Results are Important.
Swati
|
|
|
|
|
try freelance.com
Abhishek Sur
|
|
|
|
|
I guess if you can't answer a question, then you're sure incapable of communicating to a freelance client. So, you should probably go to rentacoder.com, that site is full of people like you.
Christian Graus
No longer a Microsoft MVP, but still happy to answer your questions.
|
|
|
|
|
Christian Graus wrote: go to rentacoder.com, that site is full of people like you.
Losers
"The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
"Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon
"Not only do you continue to babble nonsense, you can't even correctly remember the nonsense you babbled just minutes ago." - Rob Graham
|
|
|
|
|
Dear Friends,
i m going to create an class which is use exception class with some business logic i will return an error message to the class from where the error was occure, but to carried out this process i m retriving the error message through my database passing the error id which is comeing from the class where the error was occure (i mean i have created an table which store error message about the error in database) and using that error class i m going to show that error to my client.
you got the scenarion, now i have one question in mind that "Is this a cleaver way to stored the error message in database and use when the error occured"
can anyone give me idea about this....or even give me some good idea then what i think...
thanks in advance..
Sasmi
|
|
|
|
|
Why would you need to do this ? If you have a real need to store the message in the DB, I'd create my own exception class, and have it have a property which is the id from which to get the message. But, it seems very messy and disconnected to me.
Christian Graus
No longer a Microsoft MVP, but still happy to answer your questions.
|
|
|
|
|
i think u just catch the exceptions in a try-catch stmt. and provide ur own error messages , bcoz using a separate table storing the errors will b of no use an we can't predict the upcoming errors, it is smoothly done by the .NET frame work
|
|
|
|
|
I have a ReorderList that uses a SqlDataSource linked to an ODBC data source. I can get the initial population of the control from the database, the save of reorder updates to the database, and the deletion of records from the table to all function properly. My issue is when I am attempting to update from the controls specified in the EditItemTemplate. The database engine throws an exception because the column I use for the sort order (disporder in my case) is being passed a null value and the column has a not null constraint on it. Below is the ReorderList and SqlDataSource from the page. My codebehind is empty. Does anyone have an idea as to how I can get the proper disporder value passed to the UPDATE statement when LinkButton3 in the EditItemTemplate is clicked?
<cc1:reorderlist id="ReorderList1" runat="server" xmlns:cc1="#unknown">
AllowReorder="True"
DataSourceID="AsaSource"
PostBackOnReorder="false"
DataKeyField="id"
ItemInsertLocation="end"
SortOrderField="disporder"
ShowInsertItem="true" OnCancelCommand="ReorderList1_CancelCommand" OnEditCommand="ReorderList1_EditCommand" OnUpdateCommand="ReorderList1_UpdateCommand">
<itemtemplate>
<asp:textbox id="TextBox1" runat="server" text="<%# Eval( "name" ) %>" readonly="true" xmlns:asp="#unknown" />
<asp:linkbutton id="LinkButton1" runat="server" text="Edit" commandname="Edit" causesvalidation="false" xmlns:asp="#unknown" />
<asp:linkbutton id="LinkButton2" runat="server" text="Delete" commandname="Delete" causesvalidation="false" xmlns:asp="#unknown" />
</itemtemplate>
<edititemtemplate>
<asp:textbox id="TextBox2" runat="server" text="<%# Bind( "Name" ) %>" xmlns:asp="#unknown" />
<asp:linkbutton id="LinkButton3" runat="server" text="Update" commandname="Update" xmlns:asp="#unknown" />
<asp:linkbutton id="LinkButton4" runat="server" text="Cancel" commandname="Cancel" causesvalidation="false" xmlns:asp="#unknown" />
</edititemtemplate>
<insertitemtemplate>
<asp:textbox id="TextBox3" runat="server" text="<%# Bind( "Name" ) %>" xmlns:asp="#unknown" />
<asp:linkbutton id="LinkButton3" runat="server" text="Add" commandname="Insert" xmlns:asp="#unknown" />
<asp:requiredfieldvalidator id="RequiredFieldValidator1" runat="server" controltovalidate="TextBox3" errormessage="Enter a value." xmlns:asp="#unknown" />
</insertitemtemplate>
<draghandletemplate>
<asp:image id="Image1" runat="server" imageurl="~/fire.bmp" xmlns:asp="#unknown" />
</draghandletemplate>
</cc1:reorderlist>
<asp:sqldatasource id="AsaSource" runat="server" xmlns:asp="#unknown">
ConnectionString="<%$ ConnectionStrings:ConnectionString2 %>"
ProviderName="<%$ ConnectionStrings:ConnectionString2.ProviderName %>"
SelectCommand="SELECT [name], [disporder], [id] FROM [ajaxtest] ORDER BY [disporder]"
UpdateCommand="UPDATE ajaxtest SET name = ?, disporder = ? WHERE id = ?"
DeleteCommand="DELETE FROM ajaxtest WHERE id = ?"
InsertCommand="INSERT INTO ajaxtest (name, disporder) VALUES (?, ?)">
<updateparameters>
<asp:parameter name="name" type="String" />
<asp:parameter name="disporder" type="Int32" />
<asp:parameter name="id" type="Int32" />
</updateparameters>
<deleteparameters>
<asp:parameter name="id" type="Int32" />
</deleteparameters>
<insertparameters>
<asp:parameter name="name" type="String" />
<asp:parameter name="disporder" type="Int32" />
</insertparameters>
</asp:sqldatasource>
|
|
|
|
|
I found a solution that works for me. It would appear that each column in the SET clause of the UPDATE statement needs to be bound to a control in the EditItemTemplate. When I changed it from this:
<edititemtemplate>
<asp:textbox id="TextBox2" runat="server" text="<%# Bind( " name"="" )="" %>"="" xmlns:asp="#unknown">
<asp:linkbutton id="LinkButton3" runat="server" text="Update" commandname="Update" xmlns:asp="#unknown">
<asp:linkbutton id="LinkButton4" runat="server" text="Cancel" commandname="Cancel" causesvalidation="false" xmlns:asp="#unknown">
to this:
<edititemtemplate>
<asp:textbox id="TextBox2" runat="server" text="<%# Bind( " name"="" )="" %>"="" xmlns:asp="#unknown">
<asp:textbox id="TextBox1" runat="server" text="<%# Bind( " disporder"="" )="" %>"="" visible="false" xmlns:asp="#unknown">
<asp:linkbutton id="LinkButton3" runat="server" text="Update" commandname="Update" xmlns:asp="#unknown">
<asp:linkbutton id="LinkButton4" runat="server" text="Cancel" commandname="Cancel" causesvalidation="false" xmlns:asp="#unknown">
it worked like a champ.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm looking for a good CMS for small business that will allow me to expose contact, product, and work history details. It needn't be free, but must be quick. Is DNN up to this?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi guys i am posting this msg another time,
Plz help me,
I have two grid view, both are having checkbox template field...,
Now my question is when ever i click the first grid any of the row check box the second grid all the check box have to uncheck...,
Similarly whenever i click the second grid any of the row check box the first grid all the check box have to uncheck...,
I given checkbox autopostback event and on check changed event...,
<b>Now probs is when ever i click the first grid check box the second grid checkbox getting uncheck..., same time second grid check change event also firing.., so the first grid selected checkbox losing the check event...,</b>
How to solve this...,
This is my code:
protected void chk1_CheckedChanged(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
foreach (GridViewRow ug2C in ug2.Rows)
{
CheckBox cb = ((CheckBox)(ug2C.FindControl("chk2")));
cb.Checked = false;
}
}
protected void chk2_CheckedChanged(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
foreach (GridViewRow ug1C in ug1.Rows)
{
CheckBox cb = ((CheckBox)(ug1C.FindControl("chk1")));
cb.Checked = false;
}
}
and my aspx page:
<asp:gridview id="ug1" runat="server" autogeneratecolumns="False" xmlns:asp="#unknown">
OnRowDataBound="ug1_RowDataBound" >
<columns>
<asp:templatefield>
<alternatingitemtemplate>
<asp:checkbox id="chk1" runat="server" autopostback="true" oncheckchanged="chk1_CheckChanged" />
</alternatingitemtemplate>
<headertemplate>
<asp:checkbox id="chk1">
runat="server" Text="All"></asp:checkbox>
<cc1:mutuallyexclusivecheckboxextender id="ugm1" xmlns:cc1="#unknown">
runat="server"
TargetControlID="chk1"
Key="onegridhead" />
</cc1:mutuallyexclusivecheckboxextender></headertemplate>
<itemtemplate>
<asp:checkbox id="chk1" runat="server" autopostback="true" oncheckchanged="chk1_CheckChanged" />
</itemtemplate>
</asp:templatefield>
<asp:boundfield datafield="Itembrand" headertext="Brand" />
</columns>
<headerstyle cssclass="GHedr" />
</asp:gridview>
<asp:gridview id="ug2" runat="server" autogeneratecolumns="False" xmlns:asp="#unknown">
OnRowDataBound="ug2_RowDataBound">
<columns>
<asp:templatefield>
<alternatingitemtemplate>
<asp:checkbox id="chk2" runat="server" autopostback="true" oncheckchanged="chk2_CheckChanged" />
</alternatingitemtemplate>
<headertemplate>
<asp:checkbox id="chk2" runat="server" text="All"></asp:checkbox>
<cc1:mutuallyexclusivecheckboxextender id="ugm2" xmlns:cc1="#unknown">
runat="server"
TargetControlID="chk2"
Key="onegridhead" />
</cc1:mutuallyexclusivecheckboxextender></headertemplate>
<itemtemplate>
<asp:checkbox id="chk2" runat="server" autopostback="true" oncheckchanged="chk2_CheckChanged" />
</itemtemplate>
</asp:templatefield>
<asp:boundfield datafield="Itemflavour" headertext="Flavour" />
</columns>
<headerstyle cssclass="GHedr" />
</asp:gridview>
Thanks & Regards,
NeW OnE,
please don't forget to vote on the post
modified on Thursday, August 21, 2008 7:50 AM
<div class="ForumMod">modified on Thursday, August 21, 2008 7:50 AM</div>
|
|
|
|
|
Do it in javascript, why would you need to do a postback ? Just set the ids of the checkboxes so they are something like
box1chk1 box1chk2,etc
doesn't matter what it is, so long as you can get it via string mashing and use document.getElementById to iterate over them easily. Then make your check changed on the client side for one box, call the method that clears the other. On the client. In javascript.
Christian Graus
No longer a Microsoft MVP, but still happy to answer your questions.
|
|
|
|
|
S graus,
The problem is they dont want the functionality change...,
Ok if using javascript also how u can achieve that?,
Becoz how u will get the id of gridview template column checkbox field and how u will uncheck the second grid checkbox?,
Give me some idea plz i need that
Thanks & Regards,
NeW OnE,
please don't forget to vote on the post
|
|
|
|
|
New one wrote: The problem is they dont want the functionality change...,
Who are 'they' and, what change ? you're going to make it work.
New one wrote: Ok if using javascript also how u can achieve that?,
In the manner I described. Which bit are you stuck on ?
New one wrote: Give me some idea plz i need that
OK, in the first instance, do you know anything about javascript ? Because, I gave you the script to find the checkbox, and it has a property you set to uncheck it.
Christian Graus
No longer a Microsoft MVP, but still happy to answer your questions.
|
|
|
|
|
When I compile the following lines in Release mode is pass ok but not in Debug mode somebody knows why????
DWORD WINAPI AddressViolation(LPVOID ptr)
{
CmyDoc * pDoc = (CmyDoc*)ptr;
CPacket* pcGidelPacket = pDoc->GetProcCard()->m_pproc->GetPack();
//This is the problematic line....
bool is_discconeted = (static_cast<cpacket*>(pcGidelPacket))->send_ping(12);
};
Compiler error :
error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol "public: bool __thiscall CPacket::send_ping(int,unsigned long)" (?send_ping@CPacket@@QAE_NHK@Z)
thank you...
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
