|
Ravi Bhavnani wrote:
little less than a gallon of coffee
yow. that would cause my head to explode.
-c
Smaller Animals Software, Inc.
You're the icing - on the cake - on the table - at my wake. Modest Mouse
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actually I'm putting all his kids through Harvard.
/ravi
"There is always one more bug..."
http://www.ravib.com
ravib@ravib.com
|
|
|
|
|
It's the real Bill Nish.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote:
It's the real Bill Nish.
Huh? How do you know that Chris?
Oh you mean the logs show that those posts were made from the same IP that Bill Sergio used to post from and since he has a permanent IP...
Nish
It's seven o'clock
On the dot
I'm in my drop top
Cruisin' the streets - Oh yeah
I got a real pretty, pretty little thing that's waiting for me
|
|
|
|
|
i can't believe i'm replying to this...
Billy Boy wrote:
And you had the NERVE to say on another person's sample that yours was better!
show me where i said this was better. come on, show me. that's right, i didn't say that.
Billy Boy wrote:
You have no idea about how a prefs dialog is used?
is that a question or a statement?
Billy Boy wrote:
A prefs dialog is launched ALWAYS modeless from within a mainframe in common practice.
is this some kind of law?
Billy Boy wrote:
Consider the OUTLOOK application!
OK. if i bring up Tools / Options in Outlook, it's a modal dialog, with tabs. if i bring up Tools / Customize, it's a modal dialog with tabs. in fact, it's damn hard to find a dialog in Outlook that's not modal.
Billy Boy wrote:
It is impossible to use your code in an Outlook like application where the Prefs dialog will, in most cases, be launched from a child window in a splitter!
hey, you know what? that's your problem, not mine.
Billy Boy wrote:
Your approach is terrible and uselss bro!
then don't use it. write your own motherfucking preferences dialog, if you're so damn smart.
-c
Smaller Animals Software, Inc.
You're the icing - on the cake - on the table - at my wake. Modest Mouse
|
|
|
|
|
Bill, you shouldn't post this kind of comments, if the class don't do what you want, do it yourself .
The code Project site is the best site on net regarding sharing of knowlegde between VC++ programmers, and the the people that share with us their code deserve our respect. Normally if a class don't do a certain feature that you like, why not asking politely to author if he can help , if not, post on the forums, normally you will get some kind of response.
Imagine that this article was not a well perfoming(4.41 average for 63 users)
article from Chris,but it's yours, you certanly don't liked if a post says that that your code is absolutely f***ing stupid, wouln't you ?
Grow up Bill, okay ?
Ah and sorry for my poor english ...
Joao Vaz
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, i misposted
Joao Vaz
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Losinger wrote:
then don't use it. write your own motherf***ing preferences dialog, if you're so damn smart.
Bwhahahahahaha !!! I doubt this was Mr Sergio, only because it is an anonymous post, but all the same, this thread has been a good laugh. After Nishes comments about the rating system I think the original post proves that you judge the success of an article by how many like it, not how many don't. There is always going to be an idiot quotient, which will only rise as CP grows.
Christian
The tragedy of cyberspace - that so much can travel so far, and yet mean so little.
|
|
|
|
|
It's the real Bill, and that was the funniest thing I've read in ages.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
this article was rated a solid 4.9 for the first 2 years it was here. everyone loved it. it was happy. life was good in River City.
now it's a magnet for controversy, an argument attractor. it's been soiled, defiled, tarnished, besmirched, sullyied, smeared, stained and tainted MW; voted down for political reasons. it's good name ruined by the petty bickering of those who wish it harm.
and why? because it was too good, too considerate, too free? why?
oh my sweet SAPrefsDialog, what have i done? have i brought shame upon your good heart? have i ruined your kind soul? and for what? so that the ungrateful could use you in their mongrel applications, surround you with horrible UI, inefficient algorithms, poor design and careless use of bitmap buttons? alas, it is all my fault.
maybe i should delete it and post it under someone else's name.
-c
Smaller Animals Software, Inc.
You're the icing - on the cake - on the table - at my wake. Modest Mouse
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Losinger wrote:
oh my sweet SAPrefsDialog, what have i done? have i brought shame upon your good heart? have i ruined your kind soul? and for what? so that the ungrateful could use you in their mongrel applications, surround you with horrible UI, inefficient algorithms, poor design and careless use of bitmap buttons? alas, it is all my fault.
Now THIS is the funniest thing I've read today.
Christian
The tragedy of cyberspace - that so much can travel so far, and yet mean so little.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I gave it a 5 to start the long road to getting back up to where it belongs.
Tim Smith
I know what you're thinking punk, you're thinking did he spell check this document? Well, to tell you the truth I kinda forgot myself in all this excitement. But being this here's CodeProject, the most powerful forums in the world and would blow your head clean off, you've got to ask yourself one question, Do I feel lucky? Well do ya punk?
|
|
|
|
|
Tim Smith wrote:
Well, I gave it a 5 to start the long road to getting back up to where it belongs.
Me too. On a positive note, a couple of people have made positive comments this morning, and I reckon they found out about the article through the main page, because of this little thread.
Christian
The tragedy of cyberspace - that so much can travel so far, and yet mean so little.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chris,
Given the tone of this thread I just thought I'd add my congratulations on an excellent piece of work.
I recommended the use of SAPrefs to a customer of mine for our current project and I've recently emailed him some screen-shots of how it looks. Part of his reply is as follows:
"I absolutely love the preferences dialog. This new setup is really slick and very intuitive. In addition, it makes it much easier to add additional information or
preferences when the need arises."
Thought you might like this one
Keep up the good work and ignore the jerks
Derek Lakin.
I wish I was what I thought I was when I wished I was what I am.
Salamander Software Ltd.
|
|
|
|
|
*rotfl* muahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Bryce
|
|
|
|
|
Nicely Said, Chris
I guess the version of Outlook he has must be different than the copy you or I use, specially made for him by Bill Gates Himself.
i think he's talking out of the split between his butt cheeks
good work, utility works for me.
|
|
|
|
|
Nicely Said, Chris
Didn't you realize he has a custom version of Outlook, that Bill Gates wrote especially for him.
don't you just hate it when people learn to speak from the crack between their butt cheeks before the mouth ???
good work
|
|
|
|
|
Nicely Said, Chris
Didn't you realize he has a custom version of Outlook, that Bill Gates wrote especially for him.
don't you just hate it when people learn to speak from the crack between their butt cheeks before their mouth ???
nice work
|
|
|
|
|
Bill, you shouldn't post this kind of comments, if the class don't do what you want, do it yourself .
The code Project site is the best site on net regarding sharing of knowlegde between VC++ programmers, and the the people that share with us their code deserve our respect. Normally if a class don't do a certain feature that you like, why not asking politely to author if he can help , if not, post on the forums, normally you will get some kind of response.
Imagine that this article was not a well perfoming(4.41 average for 63 users)
article from Chris,but it's yours, you certanly don't liked if a post says that that your code is absolutely f***ing stupid, wouln't you ?
Grow up Bill , okay ?
Ah and sorry for my poor english ...
Joao Vaz
Joao Vaz
|
|
|
|
|
I consider that this site is for constructing between us and does not for destroy to us or to criticize to Us.
I consider that a constructive critic is good and are welcome. I don't agree with your type of critic.
If you believe that your code is better please,write some code for us. Chris Losinger wrote 12 excelent articles , but you? I couln't find any article written by you...
It's Only My Opinion...;)
Best Regards and Good Weekend...
P.S. When you have your own company let me know...
I vote for Smaller Animals...
Carlos Antollini.
Sonork ID 100.10529 cantollini
|
|
|
|
|
This is an anonymous post. So we cannot be sure that this is the real Bill Sergio. In all probability it is an imposter. A really dumb imposter too.
Nish
It's seven o'clock
On the dot
I'm in my drop top
Cruisin' the streets - Oh yeah
I got a real pretty, pretty little thing that's waiting for me
|
|
|
|
|
Common people.. If you can't take critisism, get out of the field. If you code is bad, someone with more experience should definetly say so in order not to confuse others.
The guy had some valid arguments....
exo
|
|
|
|
|
exo wrote:
The guy had some valid arguments....
like what? no, really - what did he say that isn't equivalent to "your code doesn't meet my special needs" ?
-c
Smaller Animals Software, Inc.
You're the icing - on the cake - on the table - at my wake. Modest Mouse
|
|
|
|
|