|
Its Web22
Its changing evertime.. It became Web03 ..now its Web04
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know about you, but this link[^] worked for me.
You can't attach a screenshot here, upload the file in another site then post the link here.
Excuse me for my improper grammar and typos.
It's because English is my primary language, not my first language.
My first languages are C# and Java.
VB, ASP, JS, PHP and SQL are my second language.
Indonesian came as my third language.
My fourth language? I'm still creating it, I'll let you know when it's done! 
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, but the link you sent me is throwing the same error to me.
Cant upload the screen shots to other site..
Any other option where i can show you the screen shot.
|
|
|
|
|
I cleared my cookies and it worked for me.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
I think it would be nice to have some setting for new messages indicator. I often find myself opening some forum with no new entry just because it's bold. Or missing some reply 'cause it's not bold (I don't have access to email at office).
Excuse me for my improper grammar and typos.
It's because English is my primary language, not my first language.
My first languages are C# and Java.
VB, ASP, JS, PHP and SQL are my second language.
Indonesian came as my third language.
My fourth language? I'm still creating it, I'll let you know when it's done!
|
|
|
|
|
On the TODO list (task #1846) 
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Just for usability really: The confirm delete message page only has a "Confirm" button, meaning you have to find your own way out if you got there by mistake. Given this is a developer's site we should be able to figure it out, but I think some kind of "Don't Delete" button would be good.
|
|
|
|
|
Done (next release)
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
While working as an organizer (e.g.: improving a question) and doing some corrections like fixing typos, it is desired to be able to "show changes" or "view diff" before submitting (updating) to ensure everything is gone right (Otherwise the editor shall cancel update and retry from the beginning).
Is there such a feature available (or planned) for the text/html input controls across the site? If no, I think it is highly desirable.
|
|
|
|
|
I like your suggestion.
Just along for the ride.
"the meat from that butcher is just the dogs danglies, absolutely amazing cuts of beef." - DaveAuld (2011)
"No, that is just the earthly manifestation of the Great God Retardon." - Nagy Vilmos (2011)
|
|
|
|
|
Something like a simple popup window that shows the diff? I think that's do-able.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now I realized that you have this functionality in article editors, like this one[^]. It just need to be made available for the question editor as well.
|
|
|
|
|
Web04 -> Opps there seems to be a server problem, try again later
While posting a comment in QA
Espen Harlinn
Senior Architect, Software - Goodtech Projects & Services
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks - working on it now.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
It's working again 
Espen Harlinn
Senior Architect, Software - Goodtech Projects & Services
|
|
|
|
|
Yes,
I will facing this thing too...
|
|
|
|
|
A number of times I've found myself foolish enough to hit the 'Reply' button after already pressing it to bring up a dialog to respond to a comment. At this stage I understand I should actually be pressing the "Submit" button.The effect is that the reply is lost. Surely I'm not the only one stupid enough to do this?
Trying to close a tab with an un-posted answer brings up a warning message - surely it would be both a functional improvement and trivial to either 1) make the Submit button both open up the dialog and submit the content contained within it, or 2) flash a warning message indicating that the content will be lost if one chooses to proceed?
As a second point, I noticed earlier tonight that after posting an answer to Quick Answers I found a need to strike-out the contents of the answer. After doing so, I noticed that the '[-] Collapse | Copy Code' buttons/links also had the strike-out applied to them. Functionally un-important, just a little weird. Here's the post I speak of: Compare File Time Function - Answer2[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Just had a whole bunch of user details not found (for myself) and blank Q&A / lounge forums, all with Web04 at the bottom. At teh same time, the membership count seemed about right, but the online number was missing completely.
This came up via Web22, so the site as a whole seems ok.
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
Manfred R. Bihy: "Looks as if OP is learning resistant."
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: blank Q&A
Consider yourself blessed, you can have a day off now.
![Jig | [Dance]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/jig.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
If I do that, She Who Must Be Obeyed will get me doing the garden...<shudder>
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
Manfred R. Bihy: "Looks as if OP is learning resistant."
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: doing the garden
Well, it needs to be taken care of, and it would be so much more rewarding.
And it is the right day for the job, as you sure have been told already.
|
|
|
|
|
It wasn't me!
I'm assuming it's settled down. For what it's worth an update has just been released.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I think someone just suggested this, but I can't see exactly what he said because he deleted his text and nobody appears to have quoted his entire message.
It would be real handy if we had a live chat system:
0) A chat would be initiated when a user poses a question. He could then sit there waiting for someone to respond. In order to start a session, the user would have to specify appropriate tags so that responders could reply to questions within their skill set.
1) When someone responds, the questioner would be given the opportunity to begin a dialog with the responder, or ignore him.
2) The number of people in a given chat session could be limited to a small number (3-4?) so that any given chat session doesn't overwhelm the site.
3) A given user could only restricted to being able to participate in one chat session at a time.
4) To afford private exchanges, the questioner could pose his question and create an invite list with users that are allowed to respond. Potential responders that aren't on the invite list wouldn't see the question in the list of live chat questions.
5) I don't see any reason for online/offline status indicators, because users would actually have to browse to the chat page to see what questions are being posed.
6) There is (as always) a certain group of people that would use this kind of thing for spam, or other kinds of abuse, but a reporting mechanism could be put into place to mitigate this issue to a certain extent.
7) If nobody responds (or if the chat session shows no activity) for a specified time period, the user would be prompted to close the chat and to try again later. If he didn't respond to that prompt in within 30 seconds, the chat session would be automatically shut down.
8) Once a chat session is ended, the questioner is asked to evaluate the quality of the individual responders' assistance, and ratings/reputation would be applied accordingly. The default rating would be 3, so if the user ignores the request for a rating, the responders still receive points for participating in the question.
The chat window could be a split window kind of thing where one pane is for conversation, and the other is for code snippets.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
modified 1-Oct-11 11:04am.
|
|
|
|
|
I like the idea, but I don't believe it would be practical.
0) Most of the inquirers in the Q&A as it is now, doesn't even respond to requests for clarification
1) If an advisor requests clarification/more details from the inquirer, like what is the inner exception. Then there will be times when the advisor has to sit there while the inquirer gets the information, and I'm sure that it could easily take multiple minutes.
I would expect that these chat sessions would take about 15-30 in average (or at least you'll have to reserve the next 15-30 minutes of your life to be sure you have the time required), that represents a lot of effort from an advisor to a single inquirer, an effort which is perfectly fine if it was a paid service.
Hell maybe that's an idea, make it a paid service that the Code Project offers and then those members who wishes to support the Code Project could offer their expertise. Personally I would be willing to spend 2-3 hours per week to support the Code Project like that.
My number one dev tool? Google
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
