|
Allowing a questioner to vote on a solution is problematic. Apart from the matter you raise some questioners are simply not qualified to rate an answer and sometimes hastily reject perfectly good solutions. I'd say just allowing the OP to accept one or more answers is all that is needed.
Peter Wasser
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: Is there any convenient way to resolve this?
I have edited answer(s) in the past using something like:
[EDIT]
This answer is for the initial question. The question has been modified meanwhile so that the answer might not apply anymore.
[/EDIT]
|
|
|
|
|
I saw that case. I was thinking that OP voted 1 (I voted 5, as it was a totally unperfect answer for a totally unperfect questin - perfect fit  )...
You can not change these thing, so it is better to getting over... "just make believe it's nothing"
"The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge". Stephen Hawking, 1942- 2018
|
|
|
|
|
The only real solution here is to remove all answers to questions that are modified.
Or, in a perfect world, to have the community remove (not downvote) answers that no longer suit a question that's been modified.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Could it be possible to lock the first version of a question after, say 10 minutes?
The later versions would only be addendum to the original and would be shown separately.
|
|
|
|
|
Can't post a Q/A answer (says server is too busy).
Sunday morning, 7:30am central time
-----------
Seems okay now. Nevermind.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
modified 18-Mar-18 9:36am.
|
|
|
|
|
It's a fairly regular issue on Sundays. I guess that's when the big houskeeping jobs are running.
|
|
|
|
|
I was deploying updates. Bad timing...
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Should I notify you when I'm on the site so you can reschedule that kind of thing? 
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
That would be great, John. I was actually thinking I should just give you my phone number so you can directly call me. Bugs, issues, minor requests, major architecture changes at 2AM to suit your whim. That sort of thing.
Would that work for you?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
You'd do that, but balked at setting up a posthumous "What Would JSOP Do?" forum?
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
On the home page i am seeing same questions since last few days, it looks like it is not getting updated, is this a known bug ? and when it would be displaying the new question being posted?
|
|
|
|
|
@Chris Maunder any update on this ?
|
|
|
|
|
Are you following a specific set of tags? Are those tags such that only a very low volume of questions about those tags get asked?
Have you tried clicking the "All" category (just to the right of "Following")?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I can see new questions by navigating via questions link for those tags but on main page I ma seeing same questions from last few days,before it was working fine
|
|
|
|
|
@Chris Maunder today it seems to be working fine now.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for letting me know
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
What's with all the <wbr> tags that appear in the question titles in some lists?
Eg:
The same tags don't appear when you open the question:
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
A throwback. I'll fix this later tonight.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I was going through some old emails with links to Forum conversations, and I tried to follow the link to an old C# Forum discussion.
Re: Is there a better way in Rx? - C# Discussion Boards[^]
It took me just to the first page of the C# Forum.
I tried searching using the title:
HEFFRON AND Is there a better way in Rx
and filtering on Forum messages, General programming, C#
I got back a list of hits that included the correct conversation, including the partial quotes, but following those, again, got me only the first page of the C# Forum. (Also, now the Layout Style had been changed to Open All. Odd!)
Why am I unable to go to the older conversations? (In this case, less than 2 years old.)
"Fairy tales do not tell children the dragons exist. Children already know that dragons exist. Fairy tales tell children the dragons can be killed."
- G.K. Chesterton
|
|
|
|
|
It seems to be OK now. There were a couple of database error at the time, probably due to the site being crawled simultaneously by several bots. This may have prevented the older messages from being retrieved.
We are currently looking at several store procedures to see if we can speed things up a bit.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
The article is: Deleted | Spam Filter for Machine Learning and AI Challenge
The section is: Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please delete my account, I plan to create a new one.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
