|
Shirley the people who close accounts for innocuous questions like this are actually the real abusers of the site.
|
|
|
|
|
No. The real abusers are those who contribute nothing to this site and come here just to enjoy on Lounge/Soapbox and to play blah blah blah leagues. Such people should be restricted to farcebook only. They can find better friends there.
Programmer : A machine that converts coffee into code !
|
|
|
|
|
 Touched a nerve I see. So you have no justification for why you reported a member for an innocuous question?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yep. Just as I thought. He didn't break any of the Codeproject rules, he broke 'Rohans'rules.
Do you not consider the detrimental effect your over-zealous actions could have on this site?
|
|
|
|
|
P0mpey3 wrote: he broke 'Rohans'rules
Don't be stupid. Show some level of maturity in order to have a fruitful discussion. I told you in past and again i'm repeating, don't be personal. If you think his account should be reactivated, email Chris or Sean.Further, i don't even care to answer your questions.
Discussion ends here.
Programmer : A machine that converts coffee into code !
|
|
|
|
|
It is not personal it is the truth. He did not break a Codeproject rule, yet you yourself decided to ban him anyway.
Rohan Leuva wrote: If you think his account should be reactivated, email Chris or Sean.
You really think that is the solution to your over-zealous voting?
|
|
|
|
|
Hello sir,
Thanks,thanks for your support ..... 
|
|
|
|
|
No problem 
|
|
|
|
|
By this standard, I will get the boot soon. I hope I am not pushed out of CP
cheers,
Super
------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it
|
|
|
|
|
super wrote: By this standard, I will get the boot soon. I hope I am not pushed out of CP
You won't because you don't make useless/personal arguments...
Programmer : A machine that converts coffee into code !
|
|
|
|
|
You're kidding, right?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Your account is active.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is very species-ist of Code Project. Why are only Human alphabets supported?
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel Pfeffer wrote: Why are only Human alphabets supported?
Because we are not dorks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel Pfeffer wrote: was clearly marked as a joke.
Then don't post it in a forum that is for serious issues.
|
|
|
|
|
It won't happen again.
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
I truly hope you were not the one who just marked my post as abusive.
|
|
|
|
|
To the best of my recollection, I have never marked any post as abusive. I certainly did not vote yours as such.
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
Added to the TODO list.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I came to this though after recent massive attack from the member I reported here:
http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/5094193/About-hatred-comments-from-this-member-spoiled-ans.aspx[^],
http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/5094082/Obscene-language-used-for-aggressive-response-to-c.aspx[^].
No doubt the offender's account will be cancelled soon, but that's not all…
More important then the score is the article rating. Unlike reputation, this is a direct measure which suggests the reader how much the article could be trusted and how much it deserves, say, referencing or more detailed study. I hardly can understand why this important measure should suffer from hatred or flame attacks based in "religious" kind of thinking. After all, this is about misleading the readers.
Besides, I would suggest that the posts, especially the answers, would be only allowed to be updated only by some members with really top reputation. My signature in answers was massively mangled to look offensive.
All opinions is a matter of controversies, but why a person who has been discussed at out abuse watch forum and ruled by community votes as an apparent offender should affect anything on the site?
—SASergey A Kryukov
modified 20-Jul-15 0:31am.
|
|
|
|
|
My 2 cents (or less): Because it may be a single bad action. By example, if I snap off here and insult you I would probably be reported and banned. That doesn't mean that I'm a total douche every moment or that I cannot express a technical opinion on something.
Of course many abusers are actually ID-10T models and should have way less rights on a decent board than the average member, still it is better to judge case by case rather than deleting all traces of activity by a member.
Geek code v 3.12 {
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- r++>+++ y+++*
Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
}
|
|
|
|
|
Of course. I don't mean abusers in general.
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
