|
on this [^] page explaining the CodeProject Article Types, there's a typo in the reference part:
CP wrote: or requite as much detail
requite => require
Never underestimate the difference U can make in the lives of others.
∫(Edo )dx = Tzumer
∑k( this.Kid) k = this. ♥
|
|
|
|
|
The sentence construction also seems a little off:
... tips are not as exhaustive or extensive, or require as much detail ...
Taking out the intermediate clauses, that reads as:
... tips are not require as much detail ...
The "or" should probably be "and do not" to give:
... tips are not as exhaustive or extensive, and do not require as much detail ...
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Ugh. Bad hair day on the wording.
I've updated to be "A tip has the same layout as a regular article but is meant primarily to provide a quick coding solution or tip. Tips and Tricks are not as exhaustive or extensive, nor do they require as much detail as an article to explain a problem and its solution. Articles may be several pages long, but a tip might be only a couple of paragraphs. Tips simply state a problem and a solution."
The updated wording will appear later today.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know what the hell is happened, when ever i click on newest questions, "CEO, Sales, Marketing" are automatically saved in filters and the only filtered questions are displayed. I can't view the active list. Any idea about how to get rid of this. I have never ever used these terms as filter!
modified 25-Jun-13 14:09pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Take this over to Sugs & Bugs, they boys will deal with it.
Reality is an illusion caused by a lack of alcohol
|
|
|
|
|
Try now.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
The Web Developer newsletter seems to be missing the interesting links from the top. For example, compare the online version[^] to the version which arrived in my Inbox[^].
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
MAtthew's on it. Thanks.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Recently we implemented content filtering based on the Newsletter setting in your profile.
I found a potential issue that may have affected how content is filtered, but I still think that you should have gotten content. Please send me a copy of the Newsletter next week if you have any problems.
Also, you have a LOT of tags in your Newsletter Topic setting. If you clear the tags, you will get everything. You may be missing interesting content just because the author did not tag it the way you would. You also do not have the News, Weekly Pool, and Popular Content checked for inclusion. You are missing some great content as a result.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks. I've cleared all the tags and selected all the newsletter features, so hopefully next week's newsletter should be OK.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
When I visit an article that has subsequently been edit, I get presented with;
"You have a new draft version. Would you like to view or edit it?"
However, if the user is not the author of the article, would it not be better to change the wording to;
"There is a new draft version. Would you like to view or edit it?"
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds sensible. Consider it done.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Morning Chris,
I noticed your attempt to implement this, but it doesn't look like it quite went right. I went into an aticle this morning and it said "There is", but the rest of the sentence and the links were missing.
Cheers,
|
|
|
|
|
The fix was fixed.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
... seems to be truncated or not filled in correctly it's showing 0 updated and added articles.
Its the man, not the machine - Chuck Yeager
If at first you don't succeed... get a better publicist
If the final destination is death, then we should enjoy every second of the journey.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Mehdi,
I meant to drop you a message on your articels at the weekend, but got side tracked and just remember just now when I noticed your name. Anyway, on your articles they often start with a long list of download versions. This in my opinion detracts from the quality of the articles.
Can I suggest the promonent 1st download link is the current version with the icon etc., and then the older versions are simply put into a table of version numbers only, e.g.
Latest Release:
icon decription/link/version number/file size etc.
Previous Releases:
1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 etc.
2.0 2.1 2.2
It would just make the start of the article look better. Alternatively, put the links to the older versions with the version history at the bottom. As there probably be very few people need them now.
Cheers,
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Dave!
That is a great idea, I have always had a nagging feeling about the long list at the top!
I will update the articles in the next iteration.
Its the man, not the machine - Chuck Yeager
If at first you don't succeed... get a better publicist
If the final destination is death, then we should enjoy every second of the journey.
|
|
|
|
|
We've recently implemented filtering content in Newsletters based on the Newsletter Topics members select in the Newsletters tab of their settings. If your selected topics settings is to narrow and there is no content tagged with matching tags, you will not see any content.
To get the most information daily, I recommend removing all of your filters and you will see all the content.
Matthew Dennis
|
|
|
|
|
The asp.net multiple file upload drag and drop with progress bar in html 5 is not getting downloaded. The page is only redirecting and download is not starting. Kindly correct these errors n rply.
Here is the url to the user control:
http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?aid=460142&av=669590
modified 24-Jun-13 1:21am.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I updated my article a few days ago, in order to use new binaries (version 8.0) to replace the old ones (version 7.5).
From the Article Submission Wizard, I can see the new binaries are ready. But once published, the old binaries remain for no reason.
Is this a bug of Code Project? The article I am referring to is
An introduction to #SNMP, an Open Source SNMP implementation[^]
#SNMP, http://sharpsnmplib.codeplex.com
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
