|
Who doesn't want to be in bed with a pillow over their head? I know I would (and I am in bed. No pillow though)
I think computer viruses should count as life. I think it says something about human nature that the only form of life we have created so far is purely destructive. We've created life in our own image.
Stephen Hawking
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you very much for your feedback Chris. I was a bit afraid about it. If you need more details or examples about what I was meaning, so you can make the section, sub-section structure... don't hesitate to contact me. I will be glad on helping you as good as I can.
Regards.
--------
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpfull answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Two thoughts on this
1. Would this fit into the "Internet of Things" chapter? I'm not sure it would but wanted to clarify your thoughts. Automation of hardware doesn't necessarily mean "connected" hardware in an IoT theme.
2. Again, we need articles before we have a section or subsection. Any lying around you feel would fit in a potential section or subsection?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Chris,
thanks for answering.
1) I am not really sure what you mean about "Internet of Things". The connections of this hardware are not necessarily with internet (it can). Usually is more intranet or just TCP/IP connection to send data to a server. The rest of the communication buses are not ethernet related and just local nets.
2) I didn't understand you correctly last time. I was waiting to know more before spending time writing. I will start with some things and come back to you in the future, so you can have a look and decide.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Because of a possibly unique "black swan" event involving being unable to un-install Visual Studio 2012 RC1, and then RTM, and then being unable to re-install, and use, my licensed version of VS Studio 2010 Pro, a month of time was lost for me in terms of being able to use VS. Hats off to one MS tech support person (and not paid support) who really stuck with me all the way through some hairy experiments that finally got me VS 2010 Studio Pro working again !
During this time, I didn't participate in Q&A, because I like, when I give responses with code, which I do frequently, to verify the code has actually compiled, and runs properly.
So tonight I dived in.
Came across the usual long posts by the same person giving boastful, off-topic replies (often turning into mini-lectures), complete with pasted-in links to many of his own previous QA answers, many of which are totally off-topic in terms of the OP's question.
Then I spent at least twenty minutes of my time, researching, thinking about, the following QA question: [^], and refining my answer to it. I tried to expand my answer in a section titled ("Speculation that may not be relevant to you") to raise additional issues I thought would be of interest to others, and might evoke some interesting responses from other CP members.
The link I gave in the first paragraph of my answer contains code the user could immediately use to solve his stated problem (if he were to give up his idea that he must use "parallel," which he only loosely defines in his question). I had previously asked the OP, in a comment, to clarify what he meant by "parallel."
Now, I find this answer has been quickly 1-voted (-16 points). I don't care about my "rep" that much, but this sudden down-vote gives me a very creepy feeling, and this event coupled with the fact nothing has been done, after so many discussions of the off-topic, combatively toned, responses given by one "dominant" (meaning posting with astounding frequency) Q&A poster:
Uh, this gives me a very creepy feeling, and perhaps I will, like Pete O'Hanlon said he was doing, several months ago, stop participating in Q&A.
It's time something was done in terms of the structure of Q&A; there have been many discussions about this here over the last 18 months, many proposals, by several people, including myself, and, for example, this post, recently, by Richard MacCutchan [^].
I accept, in posting this, that I may be describing an "intractable" problem, in that any change in QA may, either, involve a lot of work by CP staff, or involve the "metaphysical" issue of "who will put the bell on the cat."
And, I do believe that "the more freedom the better," which I also believe (to the extent I can infer Chris' principles) is a strong principle in Chris' guiding our community.
So, if you respond to this with: "just get over it"  That's cool, and I will try !
thanks, Bill
~
Confused by Windows 8 ? This may help: [ ^] !
|
|
|
|
|
You have my sympathies. I have added a +5 to your answer but it seems the 1-vote was from some big hitter; I will not speculate as to the identity of the miscreant. As to "the person of the long posts", I went through the same agonising a while back, but decided that I could either leave Q&A altogether, or just live with it. I decided on the latter, as I would rather continue to contribute to Q&A, not least because I actually learn quite a lot from it.
One of these days I'm going to think of a really clever signature.
|
|
|
|
|
Hmmmm. Univote countered.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, Pete. Probably just one of my many fans who can't tell the difference between 1 and 5.
One of these days I'm going to think of a really clever signature.
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps it's time to think of that really clever signature; win them over.
|
|
|
|
|
I concur with Richard, and added my +5 as well.
Don't give up - do just try to ignore the downvotes - we need all the intelligent people we can get over there to counteract the idiots! And as Richard says, I also learn a lot by answering questions (even if it is quite often that I could use an anger management course  )
If you get an email telling you that you can catch Swine Flu from tinned pork then just delete it. It's Spam.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm starting to think that voting for answers on Quick answers is the one place where having only a "good answer" button makes sense. An answer is either a good answer, an answer, or inappropriate / off-topic. Maybe it's worth an experiment.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not sure about that. I have seen some pretty bad answers in Q&A, and have probably been guilty of one or two myself.
One of these days I'm going to think of a really clever signature.
|
|
|
|
|
What happened about voting on comments - that seemed like a good idea, it would discourage some of what is hacking those of us who have been hacked off in Q&A.
|
|
|
|
|
I gave you my 5, too.
I also experienced the same thing, fast 1 star only vote, in the last weeks.
If there were an explaining comment, why the answer is downvoted, someone could better understand.
|
|
|
|
|
You are not alone in this, I too have pretty much curtailed my Q&A activities. Pity because I (as others have said) also learn from the process, and I get to put back into the community I found so helpful when I was starting out.
After a big gap in Q&A I was shocked by the number of people who were emulating the bad behaviour, especially the number of *snippy* "You haven't put any effort in" type comments to questions coming from new members. This behaviour has obviously been learned.
|
|
|
|
|
I submitted this article The use of MS Chart Control and VB.Net for Statistical Purposes: Plotting Kaplan-Meier Estimate.[^] hours ago. It was not commented on but still not approved, and there is no way for me to tell the precise status of my article except the term "pending" with no further details. I recently learned that an article requires a specific number of authorized users to review and approve the article. My "fear" is that if my article title is not "attractive", this will compromise the chances of getting the article approved. Is there a way to find out exactly whether my article has been reviewed or not, i mean more details not just the word "pending"?
|
|
|
|
|
I can view the article (don't have time to read it right now but will later)
That usually means it has been approved since I normally can't see the unapproved articles.
So either your article went 'live' or there is a bug allowing me to view it or I suddenly have more rights now or the system for approving articles changed.
I'm going to be optimistic and say your article has been approved 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Articles are approved usually very quickly. If it isn't approved quickly it's probably because it has issues, and members will usually provide feedback on those issues.
As you saw, your article has been approved.
There is no further precision to "pending" status that can be provided. It either has, or has not, been approved.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hello
I am having some members who sometime just post a "My vote of n" (n being a number) with nothing else.
For example I have a "My vote of 1" here A USB Library to Detect USB Devices[^] from Lavrekho.
I have another one "My vote of 5".
If I look at Lavrekho's messages, he is only posting and probably voting of 1 to several of us, see below.
Is this a bug?
Thank you very much, Regards, Steph.
My vote of 1 [^]
by Lavrekho at 20:56 16 Oct '12
Article "A USB Library to detect USB devices" (Article)
My vote of 1 [^]
by Lavrekho at 14:29 17 Aug '12
Article "Firewall using Vista's Windows Filtering Platform APIs" (Article)
My vote of 1 [^]
by Lavrekho at 13:20 21 Aug '11
.NET Remoting Message Redirection Channel Sinks (Article) Score: 5.00 (1 vote).
My vote of 1 [^]
by Lavrekho at 18:39 23 Jun '09
How to create crystal reports in .net (Article) Score: 1.00 (1 vote).
My vote of 1 [^]
by Lavrekho at 11:25 2 Jan '09
How to create Control Array in C# (Article) Score: 1.00 (1 vote).
|
|
|
|
|
slelong wrote: Is this a bug?
No, it is just that some people, for reasons of their own, do not bother to leave useful comments when they vote. You can reply to them and ask for feedback, but in general it is best just to ignore it.
One of these days I'm going to think of a really clever signature.
|
|
|
|
|
A vote of 1 on an article requires a comment to explain your vote. Lavrekho has posted a comment of "-" to circumvent this.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
On each comment you can use the "Report" dropdown (lower right of the message) to mark it as abuse. Enough votes and it will be nuked, as will the vote.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
Thanks to you all!
Regards, Stephane.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
