|
It might be just me but since yesterday the website is too slow. Earlier I though it might be yesterday's Q&A's issue but even after it was resolved, the speed has not improved much.
Page take time to load, postback, etc.
Issue?
|
|
|
|
|
It's running nice and fast as from where I'm sitting.
What's your ping time when you hit codeproject.com?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Ok. It's:
Minimum = 302ms, Maximum = 335ms, Average = 315ms
|
|
|
|
|
Oh man. You hav my sympathies.
Is the site still slow for you? Is it a particular page, forum, article, something?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: Oh man. You hav my sympathies.
Chris Maunder wrote: Is the site still slow for you? Is it a particular page, forum, article, something?
Still the same. No particular page. I am at my work place currently. Will check at home now.
|
|
|
|
|
How was it from home?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
[I was about to reply back!]
Better.
But, couple of times(for more than 10 seconds) my whole Firefox hung when I pasted something in the answer box(Q&A). I guess, it was trying to pick the wrapping for the paste - AJAX call I think. Not sure why that made whole Firefox (other tabs too) of no use. I found, I was unable to even copy URL/text from other tab. 
Any suggestions? I already restarted my FF v12 & laptop.
Further, I already have that issue of paste option NOT getting persisted that I informed last week. 
BTW, It looks like it was just me. So, now you can very well put the 'False alarm' icon beside the bug icon. 
|
|
|
|
|
When I do a site update, like I did around 12PM, things like Paste hang for a few seconds (sometimes much longer), do to the site still spooling up, and due to, evidently, the timeout I set on the jQuery Ajax call not being honoured. Grr.
The preferences not being persisted has been reported a few times and I'm still trying to get some time to dig in. I cannot for the life of me replicate the issue my end
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
As I went updating new article a few times, I also updated the attachments, by first deleting them, and then uploading the new ones.
After about 3 such updates I can no longer upload any attachment. When I hit Upload button, it attempts to do something, but nothing happens, the upload does not appear on the list anymore.
As a result, I got my currently published article without any attachment, which is quite bad, as those are shared between drafts and released articles.
Article: Basic Routing for HttpHandler[^]
|
|
|
|
|
I've reinstated the uploads you deleted so that the currently viewable version of your article has downloads.
Can I ask a dumb question: Why delete them?
In the old wizard you could just upload new ones and it would overwrite the old ones. In the new system you upload new versions of downloads, and the old versions stay where they are so the currently viewable article has downloads still working, but wben the new version gets approved, the new downloads overwrite the old downloads so the new article is pointing to the correct files.
Basically: Just upload your new files. The system takes care to ensure the correct files are linked within the different versions of your article.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for restoring the downloads, Chris!
Dumb question goes alone well with the dumb action. Thank you for the clarification, I will keep in mind not to delete the old downloads.
Cheers!
|
|
|
|
|
I doubt it was a dumb action - it just makes me wonder what made you think of doing that, since it means (to me) that we're not making it clear enough, or worse, giving you misleading cues. I'd like to make it more intuitive.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
In my decision to delete the downloads I was focused on the fact that they related to a freshly published article, which kind of didn't need to drag alone old downloads, so I didn't give it much thought before deleting previous attachments. My bad.
It is easier to keep the rules in memory for a regular writer, which I'm not.
|
|
|
|
|
P.S. On the previous subject, I tried to re-submit that article couple times, every time it would move itself from "Pending" to "Draft" without being released. That seems strange.
|
|
|
|
|
Let's look at this page:
Need help! Linking a Windows Form to a Game class.[^].
The posts "Solution 1", "Solution 2", "Solution 3": they are gray, but not indicated as "removed"; commenting them is not available and past comments are not shown, as if they were removed.
Could it be a bug (regression)?
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
I haven't see any solution.
My webbrowser: FireFox 12
|
|
|
|
|
The answers were deleted, and I've updated the code so that you simply won't see them now.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Chris,
Thank you for answering and for the information. Perhaps it will be better decision compared to showing "deleted" status. After all, "deleted" must be "deleted", not looking like "disabled". I hope deleted comments will disappear from a page, right? The inability to remove them from view (in case of accidentally misplaced or wrong comments) clutters the page.
Thank you,
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
SAKryukov wrote: I hope deleted comments will disappear from a page, right?
Yes - that's the intention (though your own deleted items will still be visible)
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you, but why? Do you mean, if I've deleted my post, it's visible? Forever? Visible to me of or to others?
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
If you deleted your answer then you'll still see it. Other's won't.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you, Chris — for the information and for all this work you are doing. I can see many signs of improvement.
Best,
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
I observed same thing & reported too - below thread[^].
Reply from Chris to my report was not clear but after reading his reply to you, it is clear now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I see only solution 3, but with all options.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
