|
|
I can view Content.cshtml with no problems.
Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff
I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for looking into it. I cannot believe it but they just fixed it minutes after I posted the issue. Very awesome!!
|
|
|
|
|
Dan Thyer wrote: fixed it minutes after I posted the issue.
It's known as Maunder Magic.
Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff
I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman
|
|
|
|
|
When I'm signed out code formatting in preview works OK, but when I sign-in it stops working:
<pre lang="c#">
var x = GetX();
</pre>
Does anyone else have this problem. Tried both FireFox and Chrome.
|
|
|
|
|
Move your mouse to hover over your name at the top right of the window. Click on "My settings", select the "Forums" tab and see if Treat my content as plain text, not as HTML is checked.
Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff
I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman
|
|
|
|
|
Is is at all possible to edit/compose something here while not being logged in?
|
|
|
|
|
I didn't think so, maybe I should try sometime.
Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff
I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like you can compose a quick answers question when you are logged out. If you click "Submit your question", you will see a message that says "Please log in (or quickly sign up) to post".
Though, the preview works fine for me logged in or logged out. Either way, PRE tags show up fine.
I wonder if the OP is pasting the text and it's automatically HTML encoding it?
|
|
|
|
|
AspDotNetDev wrote: I wonder if the OP is pasting the text and it's automatically HTML encoding it?
See my first answer. I see lots of questions and answers which are not formatted properly, but if I use the "Improve ..." link it automatically gets formatted without me having to change anything, simply (I believe) because my profile's default setting is not to treat text as plain.
Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff
I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman
|
|
|
|
|
The format gets updated automatically because when we load a question for editing we do
if (forceToHtml && format = textWithHtml)
format = Html;
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
And is an excellent feature, IMHO.
Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff
I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, that was the problem.
|
|
|
|
|
I've made a change so you no longer need to fix your profile settings. We disabled the ability to post in text-only mode (we now always accept HTML), but old profile settings were overriding this.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
When you view an article, there is a summary of the current vote at the top - but the actual vote buttons are at the bottom of the article, and can be a long way away. Shouldn't they be together?
Ideological Purity is no substitute for being able to stick your thumb down a pipe to stop the water
|
|
|
|
|
I like to know the score before I decide and start reading, and I probably want to vote when I'm through, so it does make sense to me as it is now. I wouldn't mind having them together twice, once above and once below the article.
|
|
|
|
|
I think the buttons of power should be both at the top and bottom.
"the meat from that butcher is just the dogs danglies, absolutely amazing cuts of beef." - DaveAuld (2011)
"No, that is just the earthly manifestation of the Great God Retardon." - Nagy Vilmos (2011)
"It is the celestial scrotum of good luck!" - Nagy Vilmos (2011)
|
|
|
|
|
I think that it is good as is: You want to see the rating to get an idea of how good the article is, but you want anyone voting to have at least scrolled through the whole article. I assume this is to prevent voting on just the first few paragraphs of the article, and article votes have a way bigger effect than anything else here.
|
|
|
|
|
This is exactly the reason.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I like the silver connector that relates an answer to the "parent" message  . It is very usefull in long threads. But...
Actual behaviour is: the connector is visible when you move the mouse over the messages no matter if message is opened or not, but just a very short elapse (I guess around 250ms) when you navigate the messages with the keyboard.
Would it be difficult to make it visible as long as the current message is open? I mean, just the same functionality, but staying while you read the message you have clicked on as well, undependantly if the mouse is over the link or not. It would improve the keyboard navigation through the threads.
Regards.
--------
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpfull answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
The FAQ green-button at the top-right side in Quick Answers section is not working, clicking there you land to a CP layout with
http://www.codeproject.com/script/common/404.aspx?aspxerrorpath=/KB/FAQs/Questions-and-Answers.aspx[^]
Page Not Found
Unfortunately the page you requested was not found
Just in case: Win7-64b, IE9-64b / FF10.0.2
Regards.
--------
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpfull answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
In your confirmation e-mail you have the Phishing statement half way down the page. Why not move it above the confirm button so that users will be sure to see it and read it before selecting the button. This way they will know to cut and paste the URL prior to making a choice. I almost selected the button but my senses got the better of me and I cut and pasted the URL. It was during this hesitation that the Phishing statement half way down the page caught my eye and re-affirmed why one should cut and paste URL's rather than blindly select response buttons.
|
|
|
|
|
Member 8717500 wrote: Why not move it above the confirm button so that users will be sure to see it
That is a good idea, so that people/members will be more aware of phishing and fakes.
|
|
|
|
|
Something strange is going on in the article review pages. The forum at the bottom of the page is duplicated. Also, I tried to comment on this submission[^] and my comments are accepted but then disappear, and I get forwarded to the composing page which does not have a vote option.
[edit]
I can now see two versions of the same article here[^], and here[^].
Also, some comments I made earlier on a post have disappeared. Do you have a rogue hamster on the loose?
[/edit]
Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff
I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman
modified 10-Mar-12 7:23am.
|
|
|
|
|
I'll second that. I noticed it last night but was browsing on my tablet and thought it may be an issue with that browser. It seemed fine yesterday afternoon.
Failure is not an option; it's the default selection.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
