|
He has the data but not, I think, the hours in the day at the moment.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Ahhh, the inevitable cause for project delays - there simply aren't enough hours in a day. Too bad that perceived time is still linear i nature... 
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
No no no. Polar axis is the way to go.
|
|
|
|
|
I say plot it all on the Z axis. Then we'd all be equal.
|
|
|
|
|
Wouldn't that poke CG in the eye?
Mind you, then we could get a "why Reputation Points suck" post. When he got out of hospital, of course...
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
Digital man: "You are, in short, an idiot with the IQ of an ant and the intellectual capacity of a hose pipe."
|
|
|
|
|
Log base what? 10? e? 42?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Most chart libs that support it calculate the log on their own based on the supplied data points. I know the charting code in the Silverlight Toolkit does it.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
Log base each person's member ID number.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you want a structured result 1/137.03599908451 would be fine.
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
|
I can't replicate this. Did you happen to see what markup he was using? We don't, unfortunately, version forum messages.
Yet.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
No unfortunately not, when i went back to it later, he had already changed it.
I have tried different ways of posting, but can't replicate either.
|
|
|
|
|
That is the message shown in this deleted answer. The user may have added that, but it seems like an automated message. Just thought I'd let you know in case something funky is going on.
|
|
|
|
|
Not our doing. We'd use a lowercase null 
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for further improving of the user interface of the site. It gets better and better!
However, some things are less convenient. I have two notes:
1) One feature we used to enjoy in future was removed. When we saw a list of Questions or Answers, the list shown all vote scores in each line. It was really, really handy. Not having them now is inconvenient!
2) When the number of my Answers turned over 400 (but in fact long ago) I realized how important could be a different query: by keywords found in both body and content of the Answers/Questions related to a single member. It would be extremely handy and safe enormous amount of time. Example: On a Question, I remember very relevant Answer I saw or has given myself; global CodeProject search does not help much...
Thank you for understanding.
--SA
Sergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
SAKryukov wrote: When the number of my Answers turned over 400 (but in fact long ago) I realized how important could be a different query: by keywords found in both body and content of the Answers/Questions related to a single member. It would be extremely handy and safe enormous amount of time. Example: On a Question, I remember very relevant Answer I saw or has given myself; global CodeProject search does not help much...
Exactly the same issue I face. I have already requested couple of times about this here. For me, this feature is at the top of my list that needs to be in place. 
|
|
|
|
|
I have to agree - trying to find an answer I gave months ago to the same question is a real PITA at the moment.
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
Digital man: "You are, in short, an idiot with the IQ of an ant and the intellectual capacity of a hose pipe."
|
|
|
|
|
Does the new search satisfy these two issues?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Not really. Both of them are not presently implemented. I still think they could be useful.
I mostly use Google to search through CodeProject, especially if I need to limit search to a single member (which is impossible with Google as well, as for Google it's just yet another term in the patters). And we cannot see the column of current averaged vote for the answer, as it was implemented before.
Thank you,
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
Try the 'Just My Stuff' checkbox on the Search Page. This will filter the search results to stuff you have authored.
Matthew
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you, Matthew,
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
Bug #1: When you vote on article and little window pops up, if you enter message in that window (instead of posting message in usual way), your sig is not included in posted message.
Bug #2: The line in the posted message (entered via the "vote" popup window) looks like this:
Reply·View Thread·Link·Bookmark | Edit·Delete
It should look like this:
Reply·Email·View Thread·Link·Bookmark | Edit·Delete [The "email" is missing in popup window message.]
Note: I have 'email' enabled in my settings.
|
|
|
|
|
1. I will fix this.
2. You can't email yourself. I will update the UI to show a greyed out 'email' link.
[Edit: This doesn't actually seem to be the case. I'm reviewing the code and looking for the issue now]
[Edit2: Turns out the messge was posted with "Do not allow private email replies" checked. You must have had that set in your preferences at the time you posted the comment in the vote]
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
modified on Wednesday, February 16, 2011 1:26 AM
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: Turns out the messge was posted with "Do not allow private email replies" checked. You must have had that set in your preferences at the time you posted the comment in the vote]
No, sir. I've always had "Allow private email replies to this message" checked. Hence the bug report.
Note: In the settings, it's worded positively ("Allow private email replies to this message"), not negatively ("Do not allow private email replies"). Maybe your code has the bool value flipped?
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
