|
Why not run it through something like Paint.NET? I did and got a transparent backgrounded PNG with no problems.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Pete
I'm currently running it through Photoshop - guess pretty much every one who owns a blog with background other than white will have to run through this task - so why not offer a proper logo in the first place?
It's not a critical thing, but still, it takes time and is causes a loss of quality as the logo has nicely blurred edges. And as a spoiled WPF guy, I sure do like my stuff pretty 
Cheers,
Philipp
NetDrives - Open Source Network Share Management Awesomeness
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I'm embarassed to say this : I've just spent fifteen minutes combing through My Profile, My CodeProject, and My Settings and can't find where you can enable or disable the option of the "e-mail" link appearing in messages you post.
thanks, Bill
"Many : not conversant with mathematical studies, imagine that because it [the Analytical Engine] is to give results in numerical notation, its processes must consequently be arithmetical, numerical, rather than algebraical and analytical. This is an error. The engine can arrange and combine numerical quantities as if they were letters or any other general symbols; and it fact it might bring out its results in algebraical notation, were provisions made accordingly." Ada, Countess Lovelace, 1844
|
|
|
|
|
IIRC the software just remembers the last checked value.
Edit: Confirmed. I unchecked before posting the original message and it remained unchecked the next time I hit reply.
It is a truth universally acknowledged that a zombie in possession of brains must be in want of more brains.
-- Pride and Prejudice and Zombies
|
|
|
|
|
Changing the value during an edit of an existing message doesn't save the change. Is this a bug?
It is a truth universally acknowledged that a zombie in possession of brains must be in want of more brains.
-- Pride and Prejudice and Zombies
|
|
|
|
|
No, it's by design. The settings are saved only for new postings.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Why?
It's contrary to how I expected it to work.
It is a truth universally acknowledged that a zombie in possession of brains must be in want of more brains.
-- Pride and Prejudice and Zombies
|
|
|
|
|
Because it seemed to be confusing to some people that when they went back and changed a seetting on an old message, it would update settings for new users.
I'm happy to change it so it updates regardless of new/edit.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I guess that could make sense if someone wanted to cut off a mailbomb from a heavily replied message. If you keep it that way, I think some sort of indication about the reduced scope would be in order. Possibly a Save Settings for All Future Messages checkbox with a context sensitive default.
It is a truth universally acknowledged that a zombie in possession of brains must be in want of more brains.
-- Pride and Prejudice and Zombies
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Dan,
... duhhh ... how could I forget/miss that the option is part of the mail-composing dingus and works on a per-message basis ?
Alzheimer's means never having to remember you are sorry ?
shamefacedly, Bill
"Many : not conversant with mathematical studies, imagine that because it [the Analytical Engine] is to give results in numerical notation, its processes must consequently be arithmetical, numerical, rather than algebraical and analytical. This is an error. The engine can arrange and combine numerical quantities as if they were letters or any other general symbols; and it fact it might bring out its results in algebraical notation, were provisions made accordingly." Ada, Countess Lovelace, 1844
|
|
|
|
|
You can now set these values from within the settings page.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
This[^] user looks like a spammer to me.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks!
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I have two articles of mine edited in less than 5 days; this site is becoming too nicely buggy.
Now, I'm able to read my articles and understand what I've written.
Thank you, Deeksha.
•
|
|
|
|
|
I want to edit my article but I'm unable to find the button used to appear on right side under the article info...do anybody know ?
TVMU^P[[IGIOQHG^JSH`A#@`RFJ\c^JPL>;"[,*/|+&WLEZGc`AFXc!L
%^]*IRXD#@GKCQ`R\^SF_WcHbORY87֦ʻ6ϣN8ȤBcRAV\Z^&SU~%CSWQ@#2
W_AD`EPABIKRDFVS)EVLQK)JKQUFK[M`UKs*$GwU#QDXBER@CBN%
R0~53%eYrd8mt^7Z6]iTF+(EWfJ9zaK-iTV.C\y<pjxsg-b$f4ia> -----------------------------------------------
128 bit encrypted signature, crack if you can
|
|
|
|
|
Xmen W.K. wrote: I want to edit my article but I'm unable to find the button used to appear on right side under the article info...do anybody know ?
AFAIK : you can only edit article if the article is an "Unedited contribution", Other wise you have to send mail to CP Editor with the updated article and they will do the rest !
|
|
|
|
|
No  This is not good way...
TVMU^P[[IGIOQHG^JSH`A#@`RFJ\c^JPL>;"[,*/|+&WLEZGc`AFXc!L
%^]*IRXD#@GKCQ`R\^SF_WcHbORY87֦ʻ6ϣN8ȤBcRAV\Z^&SU~%CSWQ@#2
W_AD`EPABIKRDFVS)EVLQK)JKQUFK[M`UKs*$GwU#QDXBER@CBN%
R0~53%eYrd8mt^7Z6]iTF+(EWfJ9zaK-iTV.C\y<pjxsg-b$f4ia> -----------------------------------------------
128 bit encrypted signature, crack if you can
|
|
|
|
|
Xmen W.K. wrote: No This is not good way...
Yes. It is.
The editing process allows the editors to massage documents into the CP format, and ensure that articles are "worthy" of the CP badge. It would be a retrograde step for you to be able to undo their hard work after.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, you're right but an approval system would be nice. I mean, you edit the article using CP editor(little changes) and press update. And any admin or site dev approves it(like they do to email) ?
Do you think someone should need to write an email for a little change ?
TVMU^P[[IGIOQHG^JSH`A#@`RFJ\c^JPL>;"[,*/|+&WLEZGc`AFXc!L
%^]*IRXD#@GKCQ`R\^SF_WcHbORY87֦ʻ6ϣN8ȤBcRAV\Z^&SU~%CSWQ@#2
W_AD`EPABIKRDFVS)EVLQK)JKQUFK[M`UKs*$GwU#QDXBER@CBN%
R0~53%eYrd8mt^7Z6]iTF+(EWfJ9zaK-iTV.C\y<pjxsg-b$f4ia> -----------------------------------------------
128 bit encrypted signature, crack if you can
|
|
|
|
|
To add to what Abhijit said, it'd be best if you used the "Get Article's HTML" link to get the edited HTML, and then made your changes to that before sending in the update. That way the editors will be able to update your article in a quicker manner.
|
|
|
|
|
|
and in the same league: there is a "LINQ and .NET 3.5" forum, what about NET4.0?
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles]
DISCLAIMER: this message may have been modified by others; it may no longer reflect what I intended, and may contain bad advice; use at your own risk and with extreme care.
|
|
|
|
|
I've added it - it should turn up in the list soon.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
