|
Unfortunately, allowing off site images would really be a royal PITA. The solution I like best is an upload images directory that can then be pseudo tagged in posts. Clearly the images could then only be downloaded with the appropriate referrer to keep CP from being the next Image Host provider.
Need custom software developed? I do C# development and consulting all over the United States.
If you don't ask questions the answers won't stand in your way.
Doing a job is like selecting a mule, you can't choose just the front half xor the back half so when you ask me to do a job don't expect me to do it half-assed.
|
|
|
|
|
If an image is worth a thousand words, then anything said about images can also be said about text. Do we have problems with text on CP? Yes, every day, and they get nicely resolved via the Report button. It will be no different with images.
As others have suggested, the use of images in posts can be restricted to gold and above, thus solving the #1 concern about images being posted by immature users.
Chris, I know you and Dave are concerned about this. I'm just wondering what your reaction is going to be when people start saying things like, "Well, I stopped posting on CP because they don't allow images in posts, but stackoverflow.com does."
The last time I looked, stackoverflow had not become a cesspool of pornographic images. If they can handle it, why can't CP?
|
|
|
|
|
We have problems enough with the resident kidiots posting NSFW text on the board. Letting them embed links to goatse, tubgirl, lemon party, or even just normal pron would be a catastrophe!!!!!!!
EDIT: when they can only post links, eyeball scanning can largely protect against going somewhere offensive, and for unknowns other posters can put warnings in replies. If the material opens automatically that's not possible.
Today's lesson is brought to you by the word "niggardly". Remember kids, don't attribute to racism what can be explained by Scandinavian language roots.
-- Robert Royall
|
|
|
|
|
What about yourself? Or members who have shown they have some self-restraint? What if the default setting was 'do not show images' for current members?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
My opinion is that the potential for abuse far outweighs the potential benefit.
Today's lesson is brought to you by the word "niggardly". Remember kids, don't attribute to racism what can be explained by Scandinavian language roots.
-- Robert Royall
|
|
|
|
|
Pictures are gonna be a bad idea.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
huh?
Im talking about IMAGES, not iFrames...
|
|
|
|
|
I was referring to the offending images by the names of the sites hosting them.
Today's lesson is brought to you by the word "niggardly". Remember kids, don't attribute to racism what can be explained by Scandinavian language roots.
-- Robert Royall
|
|
|
|
|
It would be nice, some problems need to be solve by screenshots. And I dont see any bad thing in it.
TVMU^P[[IGIOQHG^JSH`A#@`RFJ\c^JPL>;"[,*/|+&WLEZGc`AFXc!L
%^]*IRXD#@GKCQ`R\^SF_WcHbORY87֦ʻ6ϣN8ȤBcRAV\Z^&SU~%CSWQ@#2
W_AD`EPABIKRDFVS)EVLQK)JKSQXUFYK[M`UKs*$GwU#(QDXBER@CBN%
Rs0~53%eYrd8mt^7Z6]iTF+(EWfJ9zaK-iTV.C\y<pjxsg-b$f4ia>
--------------------------------------------------------
128 bit encrypted signature, crack if you can
|
|
|
|
|
when we do a thread search does the searching process also go through the Lounge forum posts?
2ndly, it is difficult to locate posts from google. Is this intended?
|
|
|
|
|
When you do a search from the top search bar it searches all forums. When you do a search using the 'Search comments' link at the top of each forum it searches only the current forum unless you choose 'Advanced options', in which case you can select 3 more forums to search under.
deostroll wrote: it is difficult to locate posts from google. Is this intended
No, and it's something we're working to fix.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Have a look at the page with FireFox+FireBug, that may tell you what exactly is wrong on the page, if anything.
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles]
- before you ask a question here, search CodeProject, then Google
- the quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get
- use the code block button (PRE tags) to preserve formatting when showing multi-line code snippets
|
|
|
|
|
Can you hit Ctrl+F5 and try again? It was the old expression in the CSS file. I've removed them.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
yeah they work now thanks
|
|
|
|
|
|
The bug is known, but we hadn't yet a chance to fix it.
We will get to fix it soon.
Promise.
Sincerely,
Elina
Life is great!!!
Enjoy every moment of it! 
|
|
|
|
|
Just to clarify: it should not be shown when it's the first version of the article, right? (just checking because your article is up to version 2 so in this case the version link will show.)
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Just casually observed a discrepancy. Whilst replying to a thread, 'Quote Selected Text' just validates that some text in the web browser window is selected for it to proceed. I would say, the selection range should be validated for within the context of the original message. Otherwise, for example, one can select even the top logo and it says 'Quoted by the authorname'.
For example:
dan neely wrote: 5,875,926 members and growing! (18,904 online)
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage
Tech Gossips
The woods are lovely, dark and deep,
But I have promises to keep,
And miles to go before I sleep,
And miles to go before I sleep!
|
|
|
|
|
Well even if a check was made, the poster can still manually change it to whatever he wants to. So this is not a big deal at all really.
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed in the next release.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/View.aspx?fid=343280&msg=2914505[^]
Reply to this post, the edit box is as disgustingly wide as the post being replied to. Not the width of the monitor.
FF3.0.6
Today's lesson is brought to you by the word "niggardly". Remember kids, don't attribute to racism what can be explained by Scandinavian language roots.
-- Robert Royall
|
|
|
|
|
Will fix.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I'm using opera and the site is doing postback on clicking any thread message. That was not happening before but just 1 or 2 weeks ago.
TVMU^P[[IGIOQHG^JSH`A#@`RFJ\c^JPL>;"[,*/|+&WLEZGc`AFXc!L
%^]*IRXD#@GKCQ`R\^SF_WcHbORY87֦ʻ6ϣN8ȤBcRAV\Z^&SU~%CSWQ@#2
W_AD`EPABIKRDFVS)EVLQK)JKSQXUFYK[M`UKs*$GwU#(QDXBER@CBN%
Rs0~53%eYrd8mt^7Z6]iTF+(EWfJ9zaK-iTV.C\y<pjxsg-b$f4ia>
--------------------------------------------------------
128 bit encrypted signature, crack if you can
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
