|
|
oops! Thanks - fixed in next rev.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Somwhere along the way, the old CSS style for the <h3> tag got changed.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think we've touched H3 for years.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
It used to make the text black/bold, but now it's the same as <h2>.
I need to apologize - I complained about a lot of stuff and didn't give enough info.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
Yu might be thinking of H4. H3 has always been orange.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I just posted an article "Getting Started in F# - A Windows Forms Application" and noted that there is no F# section. It looks like the article went to Forth.NET by mistake. Perhaps someone can put it in the right place and maybe add an F# section.
Also, on the submission page, I noted that there was no selection as to Skill Level, even though it's listed as item 2 under the instructions. If that's needed, the Skill Level for the article is Beginner (or equivalent).
The PetroNerd
Walt Fair, Jr.
Comport Computing
Specializing in Technical Engineering Software
|
|
|
|
|
I've added the F# sub-section. Thanks for pointing this out!
(As soon as we have enough articles we'll create a full F# section)
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, Chris. I'll see if I have any other F# articles of interest and maybe someone else will get the urge to post a few, too.
The PetroNerd
Walt Fair, Jr.
Comport Computing
Specializing in Technical Engineering Software
|
|
|
|
|
Chris, did you change something with regards to posting articles? I noticed there was a new "allowed to be edited by" thing. In any case, I posted an article a couple of hours ago, and it still hasn't shown up on the My Articles page, while it *is* being counted in my profile.
[EDIT] Here we are, about 12 hours later, and it's still not posted. I don't understand what I could have done to prevent it from showing up...
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
modified on Saturday, October 25, 2008 5:55 AM
|
|
|
|
|
There shouldn't be a delay. What's the URL of your new article? Obviously there's a bug in the system. I'll fix.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.codeproject.com/KB/work/BeingAProgrammer.aspx[^]
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
I've seen other new articles come up, but mine's still in purgatory. Should I resubmit it?
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
Take a look now.
I think it was because you didn't specify an actual technology, just an audience, hence the system didn't know where to put it. Should be good now.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Ahhhh. I figured since it wasn't about any particular language, I shouldn't pick any at all. Thanks mucho.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
I just observed that Java CodeProject and SQL CodeProject are recent graduates from CP Labs. But Lamp CodeProject is still found sporting the beta tag!
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage
Tech Gossips
The woods are lovely, dark and deep,
But I have promises to keep,
And miles to go before I sleep,
And miles to go before I sleep!
|
|
|
|
|
See this search[^] the text it is matching against isn't what is where it links.
Not sure if there's anything you can do to help it out or not.
Today's lesson is brought to you by the word "niggardly". Remember kids, don't attribute to racism what can be explained by Scandinavian language roots.
-- Robert Royall
|
|
|
|
|
That's because Google indexes all content on a page, not just single messages. A link to a single message might point to one message, but other messages will also appear which will then be returned in a search.
Fixes:
1. Feed Google single messages, 1 per page. The bandwdith requirements for that hurt
2. If you come from google then you see all messages expanded.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
That at least explains it. I've seen other sites that had a archive/search version for bot spidering that was an extremely stripped down plain text layout. That could help with the BW hit for #1, especially if it included a link the bots ignored to goto a normal forum view. Otherwise 2 is better than the current situation. One question does the link from google default to the same (or higher) number of messages per page that the bot sees? If the bot's spidering 50/page and a user with a 10/page setting clicks there'd be a large risk of not getting the right page at all.
Today's lesson is brought to you by the word "niggardly". Remember kids, don't attribute to racism what can be explained by Scandinavian language roots.
-- Robert Royall
|
|
|
|
|
It would be fantastic if it were possible to attach images to message board threads; even if the maximum size was limited.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm still of two minds on that one.
- will it lead to abuse and posting of inappropriate material (since it's harder to moderate all messages in all forums)
- will it lead to lazy people posting 1600 x 1200 full screen shots of their code instead of forcing them to paste just the relevant piece of code (though I know this doesn't always happen)
- will it cause excessive bandwidth issues?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: it's harder to moderate all messages in all forums
Have you considered recruiting volunteer forum moderators?
|
|
|
|
|
Nope. Not going to happen. Our resident kidiots would attach NSFW images and make those of us stuck working for companies with IT prudes unable to visit.
Today's lesson is brought to you by the word "niggardly". Remember kids, don't attribute to racism what can be explained by Scandinavian language roots.
-- Robert Royall
|
|
|
|
|
What if the use of images was restricted to the more serious areas of the forums. For example, no image upload support in the general discussions area.
|
|
|
|
|
then the kidiots would just post their crap in the programming forums. 
Today's lesson is brought to you by the word "niggardly". Remember kids, don't attribute to racism what can be explained by Scandinavian language roots.
-- Robert Royall
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
