|
What use would this provide, other than organised witch hunting?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
As a self-assessment test.  Besides, we already have witching parties in the SoapBox without any of this.
"If only one person knows the truth, it is still the truth." - Mahatma Gandhi Web - Blog - RSS - Math
|
|
|
|
|
Or joined the Dark Side ?
When someone made a comment last week I replied "Dear, i am the Dark Side" 
The tigress is here 
|
|
|
|
|
I really like the "My bookmarks" feature here on CP. Could this be extended, so that if an article we have bookmarked is updated, we're notified by email?
-Dy
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's on The List. Thanks.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's a difficult situation because on one hand we all want code that is bug-free and updated, but on the other authors want to be able to share their code for free without being tied down with a perpetual obligation to continually update and maintain code. In many cases authors move on to different technologies, jobs or interests and simply have no way, means or interest in continuing to update their code.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Moak
Though a good suggestion, I think in my view, this has mixed issues to address:
(*) The article might contain some discovery or troubleshooting tip which might be useful to a peer developer whilst searching the Net. That would be useful to him.
(*) The author might have transformed himself to a newer or other technology.
But I think for articles which has secured too few votes or reception by users, CP has a thing called 'Purgatory' and even there CP has a feature by which if it secures vote, it can be reclaimed into a suitable category.
Did this attend to your query?
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Web: http://www.lavanyadeepak.tk/
I Blog At: http://deepak.blogdrive.com/
|
|
|
|
|
To the 1st (*): Absolutely, and with feedback of other users some articles can be improved and increase helpfulness/value over time. I think there was a misunderstanding (with my english), with 'rotten articles' I did not mean badly written articles... but something that is slowly fading away.
To the 2nd (*): My suggestion was towards maintaining abandoned articles, NOT about removing them from CP. Assigning each good article an active maintainer could keep articles uptodate when the original author is no longer available. Here on CP there are probably users who would like to do such a work, if it would be offered: Work on something with others and see it grow better over time!
Hope it helps.
|
|
|
|
|
Hey
Is there any chance there could be a page of user statistics added to the site? Maybe a histogram of the number of people who have posted articles? Or a histogram of the number of people who have posted comments? Just trying to get a feeling for the number of people (out of the 2,000,000+) who actually participate here, and how many just sign up to ask a single question or lurk.
Sorry if this info is already available. I haven't been able to find it.
Could you also add the score for the individual articles in the author summary page (so you don't have to load the article to get an idea of how highly it's rated) and maybe an overall score for the author (all scores for all articles by that author summarized in 1 number)?
|
|
|
|
|
That's a nice idea. There should be a page with statistics about the access times, the user stats, the countries they are coming from, the browsers they are using, ...
Would be very interesting!
Don't try it, just do it! 
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe I should just open up our DeepMetrix log analysis pages
cheers,
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, good idea
Don't try it, just do it!
|
|
|
|
|
Chris -
I currently havbe a thread in the lounge where the reply repeatedly (well, two times in a row) ends up with the wrong post (everything is still ok on the reply form)
If you want me to try something, I'm at your service.
the thread: http://www.codeproject.com/lounge.asp?msg=1180881#xx1180881xx[^]
I tried to reply to Daniel Turini, but it ended up with Judah Himango two times
[edit] did you move tzhem? Thanks - even though it's not what I intended. But don't bother, I was just curious[/edit]
Pandoras Gift #44: Hope. The one that keeps you on suffering.
aber.. "Wie gesagt, der Scheiss is' Therapie"
boost your code || Fold With Us! || sighist | doxygen
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds like a threading problem which has (I hope) since been fixed.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
at the end of a page (next to copyright). What does it mean, updated? Last change to CP SW/HW or posts/articles? Than it has little informational value and it could simply be "daily updates" as well
Not really a suggestion, just curious.
ps. I just noticed.. this page... last updated 3 Nov 2001 ?  So it does mean code changes after all, am I right?
Never forget: "Stay kul and happy" (I.A.)
David's thoughts / dnhsoftware.org / MyHTMLTidy
|
|
|
|
|
It depends.
On utility pages it's the date the page was built (eg 2001)
On articles it's the date it was last updated
On the homepage it's the date the homepage was last updated (ie today)
On the lounge it's the date of the last post (again, today)
cheers,
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Either:
1. Put the Java forum back in the list, or
2. Remove it altogether.
The current situation is kinda comical.
|
|
|
|
|
On pages such as this[^], how about a filter so that we can view only articles with a rating of X or higher?
|
|
|
|
|
Hmmm... each section is sorted by rating, so ignoring everything below your threshold isn't a problem (but I guess you noticed that already)
Pandoras Gift #44: Hope. The one that keeps you on suffering.
aber.. "Wie gesagt, der Scheiss is' Therapie"
boost your code || Fold With Us! || sighist | doxygen
|
|
|
|
|
Sure, but it could save bandwidth and download time, at the very least. Plus, it would filter out a lot of fluff, thereby reducing clutter on pages with tons of articles, many of which are sub-par.
Not a necessity, just a nice-to-have.
Jon Sagara
I said NO salt, NO SALT on my margarita!!
Sagara.org | Blog | My Articles
|
|
|
|
|
The forum code doesn't detect IE 7 Beta 1. Instead of the DHTML view I'm used to from IE 6, I get the non-DHTML version.
Stability. What an interesting concept. -- Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
All fixed
cheers,
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
