|
There is one desparate programmer in QA; He[^] has posted this[^] question quite a few times
|
|
|
|
|
It looks like he's caught in a loop.
Fixed
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
Sean Ewington wrote: It looks like he's caught in a loop.
Has anybody tried break; ????
|
|
|
|
|
Recently I updated my email id in the profile and ever since I've not received any of the newsletters from CP. I changed the both login email as well as article email details. I'm able to login using the new email and the problem is only with the email delivery. BTW, I've even checked the junk email folders and nothing's there.
|
|
|
|
|
Have you run through these steps[^]?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Things seem to be back to normal now, thank you!
And apologies for posting without checking the FAQ.
|
|
|
|
|
This is in reference to this post[^].
The answer given by the first answerer[^] was completely wrong. So I 1-voted it and provided a reason there.
I also gave an answer to the question, which I feel, was a possible solution to the question.
The answerer comes back and down-vote me with an invalid reason.
Chris, I posted a reply to one of your post about removing my vote of 1 few days back. Here[^].
This is one of the example that I was talking about.
Edit: Modified the subject.
..Go Green..
modified on Thursday, September 16, 2010 11:59 AM
|
|
|
|
|
Hey Ankur, I upvoted you for the sake of Justice.
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
CCC League Table Link
CCC Link[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks DD.
But it's not about up voting or down-voting an answer. It's about the reason behind it.
I could have down-voted without giving any reason. And he would have probably never known about it.
It's like, since I voted your answer down, you come back to take a revenge and down-vote the correct answer as well.
He could have had a discussion with me and justified his point. And I could have re-considered my vote.
Moreover he modified his comments after I wrote this post.
..Go Green..
|
|
|
|
|
Sadly you are expecting sense and rationality in an environment where the only form of retaliation is the 1 vote. Now, if you could deliver a slap down the wire, it would lead to much different behaviour.
|
|
|
|
|
I am sorry but I was pissed when I saw his reply. May be because I was not in the best of my mood. 
I expected a justification.
And this is not the first time he has done such thing. He used to answer questions that were about a week or two old with nothing substantial to add.
I had the same old him in my mind.
Moreover I did a test of the answer before down-voting him.
Anyways, I got to move on! 
..Go Green..
|
|
|
|
|
Hiren has clarified his reply - and it seems to me it's a reasonable answer.
|
|
|
|
|
He has modified his comment. It was not the same when he voted.
..Go Green..
|
|
|
|
|
That's alright. Now that he has changed his post, perhaps you could re-vote? A 1 seems harsh. His reply seems to be the most probable solution.
|
|
|
|
|
That's what I meant by providing a comment there. I expected a better reply from him, a justification to his answer. But his reply was very harsh.
I did a test on my local machine.
FileUpload.PostedFile.FileName and FileUpload.FileName gave me a same value. I will test it on a server and reconsider my vote for sure.
..Go Green..
|
|
|
|
|
Okay, my point was that his original post didn't seem to deserve a 1 vote. Maybe that pissed him off.
|
|
|
|
|
That's why we have an option to re-vote.
He could have justified the answer and asked me to reconsider my vote.
Voting an answer down just because someone has voted his answer down doesn't make sense to me.
..Go Green..
|
|
|
|
|
Ankurm/ wrote: Voting an answer down just because someone has voted his answer down doesn't make sense to me.
Well he voted your post down with a comment too, right? That's the same thing you did too. (unless he edited what was originally a ruder comment). Because what I see now may be inaccurate but not rude.
|
|
|
|
|
This post would have not been there if he would have provided a valuable comment.
..Go Green..
|
|
|
|
|
Ankurm/ wrote: This post would have not been there if he would have provided a valuable comment.
Okay, I don't really see what's wrong here. You voted him down because you thought his answer's wrong. He did the same back to you, and clarified his answer better. You then started this thread here to complain about it. But to others (like me) who viewed both your answers, and both your comments, it doesn't particularly seem as if he was particularly rude to you. That's what I see here.
Once again I only see the modified comments. So I don't know if there were harsher words exchanged originally that have since been edited.
|
|
|
|
|
Nishant Sivakumar wrote: He did the same back to you, and clarified his answer better.
No he didn't do that. He voted me down and after sometime he put a comment saying my answer has nothing to do with the question (I don't remember the exact words, but he meant that).
Anyways, finish this post now. Since he has modified his comments, everything seems okay now.
..Go Green..
|
|
|
|
|
Harsh mate, harsh. Have a 5 to compensate for whichever moron univoted this again.
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: Have a 5 to compensate for whichever moron univoted this again.
Wow - I didn't think someone'd give me a 1 vote there
Thanks Pete.
|
|
|
|
|
My pleasure mate. Glad to help.
|
|
|
|
|
Not me Nish.
I am justifying because I seem to be the most probable person who could down vote you here.
..Go Green..
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
