|
Yes, that one I did have a quick look at. Not sure I downloaded any of it though.
An anomaly in the newest caching stuff perhaps?
Luc Pattyn [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
The quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get. Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they improve readability. CP Vanity has been updated to V2.3
|
|
|
|
|
So, one of my articles appears to have gone missing. Songbird[^] has flown the coop.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hmm, and yet it's sending me to the 404 on IE9. Oh goody.
|
|
|
|
|
I only get a 404 when I click the link you posted (which is to the 404 page). And I am on IE9 as well. I'm guessing one of the servers (the one that is serving you) is going bonkers.
|
|
|
|
|
Web23 seems to be the one.
|
|
|
|
|
I think you need some comfort[^]...
Luc Pattyn [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
The quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get. Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they improve readability. CP Vanity has been updated to V2.3
|
|
|
|
|
When not logged in browsing Reputation History[^] returns an almost empty page, without much of a clue as to why.
Luc Pattyn [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
The quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get. Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they improve readability. CP Vanity has been updated to V2.3
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks - will have this fixed today
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yep, for me too. Let's wait for some time.
|
|
|
|
|
How much time?
Months?
Years?
I really should of said "For quite some time now."
|
|
|
|
|
cwg wrote: How much time?
Months?
Years?
I really should of said "For quite some time now."
Actually many people still enjoying the weekend. So be calm. Give them some more time.
If still you want the code urgently.......I just found another way. Use Browse Code[^] of that article. Copy the contents from those files & integrate it yourself. That's all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I've fixed this instance. Are there others?
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
Not sure if this is an IE9 bug or a CP bug. See this message. Sometimes this list shows the numbers as [0, 0] and sometimes the list shows as [1, 2]. The change doesn't even require a postback. I one noticed it as [0, 0], then clicked the title twice to collapse and expand the message, and it then showed as [1, 2]. Does CP have any weird JavaScript in place to change these numbers? If not, then I'm guessing it's just an IE9 bug.
|
|
|
|
|
Seems to be an IE9 issues. Others are experiencing the same problem.
|
|
|
|
|
IE9 is a dog's breakfast.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Take a look at at the bottom of my article and you'll see that Brij has voted 5 twice. I remember the first 5-vote made by Brij because I got 80 points for it. Seems my reputation history shows an entry for the second 5-vote without showing an entry to negate the first 5-vote. In other words, I see this:
29 May 2011 12:44 AM Article Upvoted Author Article Managing Your JavaScript Library in ASP.NET 80
But I expect to see this:
29 May 2011 12:44 AM Article Upvoted Author Article Managing Your JavaScript Library in ASP.NET 80
29 May 2011 12:44 AM Article Upvoted (undo) Author Article Managing Your JavaScript Library in ASP.NET -80
Note that the second 5-vote didn't actually seem to increase my reputation points. It just appears it did from my reputation history. And it didn't leave an extra article vote... my vote count before and after Brij's second vote held steady at 32.
|
|
|
|
|
AspDotNetDev wrote: I got 80 points for it
1 vote gives 80 points now!
I thought 40 was max... looks like some revision somewhere that we missed.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I was a little confused about that as well. I've gotten about 3 80-point upvotes. I think they come from platinum authors.
|
|
|
|
|
AspDotNetDev wrote: I think they come from platinum authors.
If that is the case, and you are ok , I can quickly check that for you...
|
|
|
|
|
Haha, you are the second member I've run into in the last few minutes who has recently attained platinum authorship. Congrats on that and congrats in advance on hitting 200,000 (won't be long now).
|
|
|
|
|
AspDotNetDev wrote: you are the second member I've run into in the last few minutes who has recently attained platinum authorship
Yeah, current 5 points per download speeded that up a little.
AspDotNetDev wrote: Congrats on that and congrats in advance on hitting 200,000 (won't be long now).
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
AspDotNetDev wrote: I think they come from platinum authors.
So how much was it right now?
BTW, strange, I did put my comments too along with the vote but I don't see it yet in the message board. Will wait for sometime to make sure if it is a bug/issue.
|
|
|
|