|
When I click on My Articles I only get up articles that are not published yet or have a saved edit that is not published. Other than that, all is well
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
In Q&A solutions, a vote of 3 stars used to be neutral (for years).
Is it normal that it is now a downvote ?
Is it possible to get back to neutral ?
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
Or maybe get rid of the radio buttons and replace with a slider-bar.
One that starts with 0*
* The current 1 star minimum reeks of VB6.
Ravings en masse^ |
---|
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
ppolymorphe wrote: Is it normal that it is now a downvote ?
Where does it say it's a downvote? (It shouldn't be)
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
When this single vote of 3
What is going on in the javascript code?[^]
results in '
Answer Downvoted ' and -16 in reputation, it give le the strong feeling of a downvote.
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
That certainly seems suspicious.
I'll look into it.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Message Removed
modified 27-Jan-18 14:31pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previously, you could click on "v2" or "v3" after the author / revisionist name and see what the changes between versions were. Currently, it's just taking you to the same page, although the URL is ListVersions.aspx : Splitting a webpage in two videos[^] for example.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Previously reported two weeks ago:
Unable to view QA revision history[^]
I guess the email problems pushed it down the "TODO" list.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
He's such a joker, our Sean.
(I will dig in and see where the bad rep is coming from)
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Nah, let him have some rep point debt for a while.
|
|
|
|
|
The hamsters are good and wonderful and kind. They are fair. I am safe. Do not send help. *looks behind shoulder for approval*
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Message Removed
modified 22-Jan-18 12:10pm.
|
|
|
|
|
When I try to log in using any version of 'sign in' that I can find, the fields for email and password are covered by the 'new member' fields, or they do not show up. JS is working for this site.
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry: I was unable to use the forum until I signed in, and I could not sign in, at least according to the information available on the forum page.
Regardless, subsequent to signing in, I found another post about the same issue, and the response mentioned ad blockers. I was trying out UBlock Origin. Having disabled it, I can now sign in.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the update.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I can log in fine, using Chrome and uBlock - but CP is on the whitelist.
If you whitelist CodeProject (a good idea anyway) you will probably be able to login and block ads from other pesky sites.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
(and being able to choose more than one bug&sug type; perhaps just two types)
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Best CP Thread of the Year Award
That would be open to debate. Endless, endless debate
RedDk wrote: and being able to choose more than one bug&sug type; perhaps just two types
I have an idea that should be easy to implement that would help with this.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: That would be open to debate. I nominate the thread debating which thread was best.
Chris Maunder wrote: should be easy to implement Famous last words. Hope you didn't have plans for the weekend.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote:
That would be open to debate. Endless, endless debate
Why don't you use the scoring system? Thread with highest rep points (including topic starter comment and all responses).
|
|
|
|
|
All of my threads are pure gold. It would be too much of a burden on the CP staff to pick the best one, so to save you guys work, I vote that you reject this request.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010 ----- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010 ----- When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Why limit it to years ? Why not a Thread of the quarter, month, week, and day, for each Forum on the site ?
And, why not special awards per Forum per time interval as above ... in categories like: Most Congenial, Most Literate, Most Esoteric, Best Formatted Code, Most Diversity Inclusive, Most Off-Topic, Most Sociopathic ?
Rounding out the award smorgasbord could be a category of Least Awarded ... but, what to do in case of ties ?
Of course, that's just for a start !
cheers, Bill
«... thank the gods that they have made you superior to those events which they have not placed within your own control, rendered you accountable for that only which is within you own control For what, then, have they made you responsible? For that which is alone in your own power—a right use of things as they appear.» Discourses of Epictetus Book I:12
|
|
|
|