|
_Russell_ wrote: remaind to the OP to sign the thread as SOLVED after some hours
But not after hours. Experts-Exchange allows for 21 days since message boards involve a group colloboration effort in problem solving.
|
|
|
|
|
CP can send multiple e-mail to request to 'close' a single thread:
for example after 1hour, 3h, 6h, 12h, 24h, 3days, 7d, 14d, 21d , 30d.
Of course if the thread is [SOLVED] the mails will not sended.
This let the forum board be more 'clean' and people can helps only who needs.
Russell
|
|
|
|
|
_Russell_ wrote: multiple e-mail
Considering the user base and the intense furious activity on discussion forums, the load on the CP SMTP server would be really breaking its neck. This would be a very resource-consuming route. Wouldn't it be?
|
|
|
|
|
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar wrote: Wouldn't it be?
Yes, it can.
But consider that the 'remaind mails' are received only by the poster of the first message of the threads. And that (as a benefit) if they 'close' a thread nobody will add other post to respond to they.
That mails can only be used to educate the user of the forums to be correct with to who help they and to CP (leaving clean the forums)....I hope.
Russell
|
|
|
|
|
Not only the original poster, but anybody could mark an answer as useful by providing it a 5 vote. We need not get anything new here, for this reason.
Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero
.·´¯`·->ßRÅhmmÃ<-·´¯`·.
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds like a plan. But I doubt how successful it would be. The reason is that alot of people asking queries here are half-assed and they won't bother to come back and click the "SOLVED" button after their query is solved. With the current system, anybody could mark answers as useful by voting 5.
Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero
.·´¯`·->ßRÅhmmÃ<-·´¯`·.
|
|
|
|
|
for this I thinked to e-mails to remain the poster to declare solved his thread
Russell
|
|
|
|
|
_Russell_ wrote: I thinked
That explains it all
|
|
|
|
|
|
_Russell_ wrote: if this == false then exit(0);
That doesn't look like C++ to me.
|
|
|
|
|
over-meticoloussss
Russell
|
|
|
|
|
You have come to prove that when [SOLVED] is in the subject line, people clearly continue
to read and reply, so it does not work.
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles]
this weeks tips:
- make Visual display line numbers: Tools/Options/TextEditor/...
- show exceptions with ToString() to see all information
- before you ask a question here, search CodeProject, then Google
|
|
|
|
|
It is more an attitude issue to show his gratitude when his problem is solved that he gratefully acknowledges the help that he has got from the public discussion board.
|
|
|
|
|
Oops....
Russell
|
|
|
|
|
|
thanks for all the members in the board for the response i got for the suggestion i made.
lets wait till chris maunder and co implements any logic for this, till then as our part, we shall frequently keep posting it in the normal forums.
such that, more number of people will see this and impolement it. no sooner, iam sure that, every body follows that.
many more thanks to Russel, who put it in the suggestions forum.
|
|
|
|
|
chandu004 wrote: thanks to Russel
thanks.![Rose | [Rose]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif)
I think that a lot of people are thinked to this feature in past (like me) so you can find a lot of cooperating members.
good luck
Russell
|
|
|
|
|
|
No - that misses the point of the Coding Horrors forum. Show me some bad, bad code. Don't show me a design that may not suit what others are doing.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: Show me some bad, bad code
Chris,
I actually wanted this Move for the reason that IE 7 terribly misses even the backward compatibility issue. When you have a semicolon in the filename, the File Download dialog shows a wrong info. In IE it manages to show the File Type but IE 7 breaks its own settings of 'Inspect file by content instead of file name' and shows 'Unknown File Type'.
|
|
|
|
|
So I was thinking about those fellows who vote an article --usually down-- without even reading it. Don't know if this has already been suggested, but what about to add some kind of timer to disable the voting button until n minutes have passed since the page was loaded, where "n" might be calculated according to the number of lines the article has with an aproximate on how long does an average person take to read a line?
Hope is the negation of reality - Raistlin Majere
|
|
|
|
|
Haste makes waste.
Why should we bother about half-brain-pals? Just ignore them. A real good article would automatically earn good credits in no time, in fact, breaking the poisons seeded by the sinister Univoters.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I know. Particularly I don't mind --furthermore, I only have 3 articles published  . Still there are many people who mind, so I believe this wouldn't take too much effort... Just a thought.
Hope is the negation of reality - Raistlin Majere
|
|
|
|
|
I think considering the storm of 'Univoter Menace' sometime about a fortnight back, Chris & Co should be working on it. Most probably, we should be finding some robust means in the next new version of CodeProject that they are planning.
|
|
|
|
|
I was wondering how the articles are chosen. I assume it's the top ten rated articles in month?
I'm kinda curious why my article[^] isn't listed. It was submitted in July and has a decent rating.
Mind you, this isn't a big deal and not a complaint. I wouldn't have a prayer against the competition this month. 
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
