|
The soapbox seems to have a disease again. This[^] appears to be the last post ever...
|
|
|
|
|
Change your "Messages Since" filter to something other than "Last Day"
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
There is one more observation with respect to Soapbox. Very often, I see 'Timeout Expired' when navigating between forums and in 6 of 7 cases, Soapbox forum succumbs to this error.
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder,
How can a user find out
the administrators list of this forum ?
|
|
|
|
|
There isn't such a list. Is there anything specific you need?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Yes.
But I will be back in 2 or 3 days.
Wait please.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
agreetogri wrote: But I will be back in 2 or 3 days.
Wait please.
Is he allowed to get up and go to the toilet or does he have to sit around with a pained expression on his face?
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
|
|
|
|
|
5~! 
|
|
|
|
|
Real men drive manual transmission
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder,
What is the Trademark of this forum software ?
Who is the author of it ?
Which significant features of it
still keep you using it ?
|
|
|
|
|
We wrote it and we like it because it does what we need and works well with our system.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Is it possible to eliminate the Precipice (Chasm)
between the fact of that you like your product (~CPF~)
and the fact of that an indefinite wide group of Space Humans
can not adapt themselves to use it ?
Is CPF open source product ?
ps.
How can a user get a quote of the original post
which he is replying to
to insert it in his reply at the preferred forum ?
|
|
|
|
|
agreetogri wrote: indefinite wide group of Space Humans
Hey - Bob is the only alien allowed around here.
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder,
would you like to create additional board
devoted to SMF development ?
|
|
|
|
|
I am sick and tired of Kyle and Tim Craig consistently replying to everything I post regardless if its humor, a helpful advice, or just simple conversation. I know if I post something about cough syrup or troll I deserve a sh*tty reply, but if I'm in the lounge I do not need Kyle or Tim Craig shitting on me. I have no more tolerance for it and harassment should be punished accordingly. An email should be sent warning these folk that if they continue, their account will be deleted and if they create a new one and their identity is discovered, it should be deleted again. People like this should be indefinitely regected from this online community. I know I have posted some sh*tty posts and If I do it again, delete me and do the same for others.
"But mother, I'm being a piece of sh*t on the internet." - Kyle (aka Demon Possessed among many other aliases at Code Project), October 2007
|
|
|
|
|
Be Friendly. 
|
|
|
|
|
 [Wipes sweat from forehead] When I seen the title of your message I thought you were going to say something else.
"But mother, I'm being a piece of sh*t on the internet." - Kyle (aka Demon Possessed among many other aliases at Code Project), October 2007
|
|
|
|
|
Captain See Sharp wrote: I am sick and tired of Kyle
We all are. That is why I don't reply to it...
"Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon
|
|
|
|
|
You have made explicit and graphic physical threats against another person on our forums. Regardless of any provocation this is unacceptable and against the law.
Your account has been removed.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: Your account has been removed.
Hey Chris,
His article has not been deleted though :-
http://www.codeproject.com/useritems/Slitherz.asp[^]
So he won't be able to address any posts in that artcle's forum. Is there a way to allow him to post there (just on his article)? If not, shouldn't his article also be deleted?
|
|
|
|
|
If the post has replies, don't actualy remove the post, just replace the contents with a message. Like when a message gets marked as spam.
I hate when someone deletes a topic with replies. The replies get left floating around, and get mixed up in other topics. And then if someone replies to your loose reply, it usually doesn't end up underneath it, but somewhere else.
It does my head in 
My current favourite word is: Waffle
Cheese is still good though.
|
|
|
|
|
The Undefeated wrote:
I hate when someone deletes a topic with replies.
You aren't the only one. I usually put the original message in my post, so if the OP deletes it, and someone else comes along wondering what the question was, they've got it.
"Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon
|
|
|
|
|
A post will sink out of sight as new posts are added. I suggest that if a top-level post is modified by its author, the whole thread should be moved to the top of the forum (this includes article forums). I realize this could also be accomplished by simply posting a new message, but what I suggest will preserve existing comments.
|
|
|
|
|
Ironically, this[^] issue is being discussed in the lounge right now.
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
|
|
|
|
|
Not ironically at all, actually. John's concerns were about wading through hundreds of posts to find his thread. I think this can be solved by a combination of 1) getting an email notification when someone responds to your post; and 2) using a permalink to quickly jump to the thread you started.
What my suggestion addresses is the situation where an op adds details or clarifies a post. In that case, previous viewers of his post may have a better answer for him, and so it is appropriate to move the thread to the top.
Note that I am suggesting that the thread be moved to the top only when the top-level post has been modified, which is different (I think) from what others have suggested.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
