|
I'm still trying to replicate this.
It's definitely still happening for you? FireFox only?cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
It does not happen always. 3-4 days it was fine but i was again facing this issue yesterday. 
I switched to IE. All was working fine.
|
|
|
|
|
| At the bottom of the page you will fine the name of the server you are currently on (Web9, Web16 etc). Let me know if it's Web21 or Web22 - I've been having some weird issues with these two and that might be the problem. cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Currently connected to:
Web18 | 2.2.0254
Web13 | 2.2.0254
Yet the whole page reloads when i click messages in Firefox.
Not sure if it's CP issue, as i looked the site in my colleague's system today. It was working normal in his system Firefox.
|
|
|
|
|
AFAIK this never used to happen...
When I open a forum it takes a few seconds to load, (slow connection at work) I see the threads and replies appear one by one.
Usually I'll start reading before the page is finished loading...
Lately when I click a message while the page is still loading it opens up as expected, but then the whole page gets loaded again, from scratch.
Its quite irritating, was there any changes made that would have caused this?Harvey Saayman - South Africa
Software Developer
.Net, C#, SQL
you.suck = (you.Occupation == jobTitles.Programmer && you.Passion != Programming)
1000100 1101111 1100101 1110011 100000 1110100 1101000 1101001 1110011 100000 1101101 1100101 1100001 1101110 100000 1101001 1101101 100000 1100001 100000 1100111 1100101 1100101 1101011 111111
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rajesh R Subramanian wrote: I reported this issue, something like a week ago
Oops, I apparently missed it :PHarvey Saayman - South Africa
Software Developer
.Net, C#, SQL
you.suck = (you.Occupation == jobTitles.Programmer && you.Passion != Programming)
1000100 1101111 1100101 1110011 100000 1110100 1101000 1101001 1110011 100000 1101101 1100101 1100001 1101110 100000 1101001 1101101 100000 1100001 100000 1100111 1100101 1100101 1101011 111111
|
|
|
|
|
I noticed it too. Quite disappointing.
 If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
Wow! Chris almost convinced me that it's a caching issue at my side OR that this issue exists only in my imagination.
Now we have this reported from India, SA and Italy. Where is he now?
“Follow your bliss.” – Joseph Campbell
|
|
|
|
|
Rajesh R Subramanian wrote: Now we have this reported from India, SA and Italy. Where is he now?
Racking up frequent flyer points trying to purge the caches of people in India, SA and Italy."WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx
|
|
|
|
|
Wow, idea for Chris amusement: let's invent a fictitious bug and signal it from Italy, India,...  If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
Disappointing?
That's a new term for a bug. 'Annoying' I can understand. 'Unnecessary', yes. 'Fix it NOW or I will post the Badger song link' - sure. But 'disappointing' makes me feel like I'v introduced a bug and it's a bug that isn't living up to its potential. A failed bug. A bug that grew up trying, that worked hard, that was never able to achieve the lofty, destructive heights of its peers - that may have even had a lonely loveless childhood - and now that it's out in the world in its first big production the results are...disappointing.
I'll have a word with it.
(We know the change that caused it, but in rolling back those changs the bug is still here, meaning it's a little trickier than we thought. We may actually have to debug or something crazy like that. I'll go get some gloves)cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Fix it NOW or I'll post the badger song link.
“Follow your bliss.” – Joseph Campbell
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: But 'disappointing' makes me feel like I'v introduced a bug and it's a bug that isn't living up to its potential. A failed bug. A bug that grew up trying, that worked hard, that was never able to achieve the lofty, destructive heights of its peers - that may have even had a lonely loveless childhood - and now that it's out in the world in its first big production the results are...disappointing.
You need a break. Have a ![Beer | [beer]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/beer.gif)
Actually, I did intend 'annoying', that was my bad English...  If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
| Luckily I was not drinking anything while reading this. My co-workers are trying to figure out why I had a fit of laughter though. That's a new term for a bug. 'Annoying' I can understand. 'Unnecessary', yes. 'Fix it NOW or I will post the Badger song link' - sure. But 'disappointing' makes me feel like I'v introduced a bug and it's a bug that isn't living up to its potential. A failed bug. A bug that grew up trying, that worked hard, that was never able to achieve the lofty, destructive heights of its peers - that may have even had a lonely loveless childhood - and now that it's out in the world in its first big production the results are...disappointing.
-Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
My post turn gray after the first vote. Shouldn't it do that after 3 voters and not after the first downvotter  modified on Thursday, March 4, 2010 4:39 AM
|
|
|
|
|
| Set you noise level higher. ------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Toward the top of the page, Noise Tolerance drop down box. ------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
|
|
|
|
|
What is Noise Tolerance and what does its levels stand for?
|
|
|
|
|
| Alter it and see ------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
|
|
|
|
|
No more gray color, but still posts are downvoted
|
|
|
|
|
Cpianism wrote: No more gray color, but still posts are downvoted
This reply should be carved in gold, framed and displayed in the Frickin' Idiots Hall Of Fame
|
|
|
|
|
Changing the noise level only affects you. It doesn't make your posts any less likely to get downvoted. It's not as though your changing your noise level magically removes you from the view of people who you've irritated over the year. Now that would be one hell of an improvement to the forums."WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx
|
|
|
|
|
In other words, ignorance is bliss.
“Follow your bliss.” – Joseph Campbell
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
