|
Today I was seeing this:
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Yep, that's the one...
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010 ----- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010 ----- When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
We've had some issues with Web Servers that had Windows Updates waiting for restarts to complete the update. It seems to clear itself up after some time, or a simple IIS reset clears it up.
It should be OK now.
Has anyone else noticed performance issue with pending Windows Updates on their Servers, Workstations or Laptops?
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
Matthew Dennis wrote: Has anyone else noticed performance issue with pending Windows Updates on their Servers, Workstations or Laptops?
Yes. We had one virtual 2012 server which kept failing to install the monthly cumulative updates. Whenever that happened, it would effectively be out of service for the next 12-24 hours because the disk was thrashing reading and writing the msu file for the failed update.
Thankfully, we retired that server last year.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Thanksfully this CP Service is not a thingh which needs to be productive, Sorry but how you will explain this "very simple issue" in case you are in a _real_ production environment? I mean nothing happens if CP fails then and when, but imagine you are in real production... strange...
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Whatd o you mean, nothing happens? Think about the global panic by millions of users when the realize they have to do there own homework?
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
That's true, but this is more a theme for this thing which does not exists any longer
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
This article in moderation[^] has problems with its download.
and clicking "click here" brings
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
modified 24-Sep-19 14:07pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I'll take a look, but I think Sean is already on it.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
Working now... point can be closed
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I have edited this article a few times, deleting the tags XML, .NET, Objective-C, Text, Markdown, and VS2017. Some of them are not germane, and others are simply wrong. Yet they magically keep reappearing, so I'm curious as to what's going on here.
|
|
|
|
|
Faced the same issue many times. +1
Something is definitely wrong with auto tagging.
|
|
|
|
|
We analyzed the article and its downloadable files and add tags related to the content such as language and file types. We might be being a little aggressive in this.
We'll look into it.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks.
At the risk of being a buttpain, this article has download links (right at the top) to GitHub API stuff that doesn't work. I changed them to links on your site that do work, but later they reverted. Reversion probably occured during mirroring, because the article seems to update every time I change the master branch on GitHub (even if its README.md hasn't changed). Also, when the article was imported, links within its body were modified to reference CodeProject rather than GitHub, so now they lead nowhere.
|
|
|
|
|
Little bit below on branches, same issue: Github-links-are-broken[^]
What i did eventually is just manually changed article's links to repository. This system definitely is not working as intended
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the suggestion. I've done this and am hoping that they don't break again.
|
|
|
|
|
Message Removed
modified 20-Sep-19 13:11pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Reported below, but it has incorrectly been marked as "fixed".
Pick a random article with a download hosted on CodeProject. Click on the link to download the file. The "File Download" page appears, but after ten seconds, you are redirected back to the article page with a black banner at the top which reads:
"You have been redirected to the home of the file you requested to ensure you get the latest version of the file as specified by the article author."
Sample URLs:
- /Articles/2939/Network-Shares-and-UNC-paths
- /KB/IP/NetworkShares/NetworkShares_src.zip
- /Articles/2939/Network-Shares-and-UNC-paths?rp=/KB/IP/NetworkShares/NetworkShares_src.zip
This is happening on every article I've tried. However, it only affects Firefox (v69.0.1); Chrome (v77) works as expected.
I've tried deleting all cookies and site data, signing out and signing back in again, and restarting both the browser and the computer. Nothing makes any difference.
Let me know if you need any more information to track down this annoying bug.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Turns out FireFox is playing silly buggers with HTTP_REFERER.
Working on a work-around.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Do you need to set a Referrer-Policy[^]?
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
You'd think.
However, FireFox treats meta refresh differently to other browsers. There's a great demo at https://meta-refresh-referer.glitch.me/. run it in FireFox and Chrome and you'll see the difference.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Atm you can only choose from the predefined list.
Would be nice and appropriate to allow a custom license to supply for the code.
|
|
|
|
|
The problem with that is that everyone who wanted to use the article code would have to become a lawyer to understand exactly what they can and cannot do - and every author that wrote one, and every moderator that tried to approve it (we can't approve articles if the licence says "you can't use this unless you pay me" for example).
At least with a fixed set, everybody gets a good idea in advance of what they allow (within limits, I'm still not sure what CP allows and GPL3 doesn't for example!)
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
[^] Meaty essay, there; I thought there was a jobs/contracting/employment forum.
«One day it will have to be officially admitted that what we have christened reality is an even greater illusion than the world of dreams.» Salvador Dali
|
|
|
|
|
The 'Work Issues' forum maybe?
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|