|
If guess is the case...
I think, its the highest reputation one has that is assigned as a total reputation.
Thus, if i had achieved a GOLD at max in any of the category i am a GOLD reputed overall.
Thus no total points based, but on highest reputation attained!!
|
|
|
|
|
Then I would be platinum since I have that for debator.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I can't that's the problem
See my message to that person here[^]
I guess we'll have to wait and see how it looks after Chris ran the update.
|
|
|
|
|
| This is a bug and could be related to the previous bug for which a fix will be uploaded today. cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
| To give an upper bound, 36k total scores as platinum... 3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
I analyzed it a bit further, found these accounts:
Naveen Karamchetti: author silver 4410, all others white, total silver 4690
Trenton Moss: author gold 8055, all others white, total gold 8164
brianwelsch: debator platinum 9207, all others white, total platinum 9750
roger allen: author gold 6905, debator platinum 2633, all others white, total gold 10213
and that lead me to these conclusions:
- total color does not have fixed thresholds;
- total color is the color of the highest rep number.
|
|
|
|
|
I too had same analysis. But Tom himself is an odd one out! See the replies above...
|
|
|
|
|
I have changed the wording of the tooltip to make this clearer. It shows your highest achieved level.
This "highest achieved" value isn't used for anything. We use individual rep types when deciding on features available.cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
 Mine and Luc guess were right! 
|
|
|
|
|
Sandeep Mewara wrote: Mine and Luc guess were right!
Nope. That is not what I said, and I do not believe it to be true either.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I suggest you look again into the "total color" of the three accounts mentioned in my above message.
The two pages are now in agreement, the total color still is the color of the numerically highest rep component.
|
|
|
|
|
Although I did find some more total-rep-color mistakes early on after the update, all is OK now. Total color now equals highest color for all the accounts I checked (about 200, I have a little utility that does it of course).
|
|
|
|
|
When I post an answer in Quick Answers my rep score is showing up only as;
Rep: (1,064)
Which is a bit strange as previous answers show up as;
Rep: 3,623 (4,687)
Not sure if this is the cause but I posted an answer to a question that was deleted while I posted the answer. 
|
|
|
|
|
Has been reported.
Chris fixed it and should be updating somewhere today.
|
|
|
|
|
It seems I have a total rep shown as a platinum.
But hang one, I was a gold member, and now I have a total that sums to platinum.
Great.
But I liked being a Gold, knowing that Platinums were top members.
Gold gave me allowances that were denied me as a platinum, I do not deserve a platinum membership, please allow me the rights of a gold, (That I have never abused), and allow me to work to be a platinum in time.------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not agreeing or disagreeing here Dave, I'm 'on the fence' over some parts of the new system.
The new reputation system (I think) is trying to reward members for their contribution to the site overall and not primarily focusing on answering PQs and writing articles.
CP is more than just that. The Lounge for example, for many, is the heart of this site and many rarely stray from there. They are still valuable members of the CP community and make the site the wonderful place it is. People who are prolific in such forums can now be recognised for their contribution in that area. If that, as in your case, leads to them becoming Platinum overall, then that is deserved just as much as if they had written 25+ high quality articles as it was before.
CP without guys such as yourself would be so much less and I'm glad they now receive more prominent recognition.Dave
Binging is like googling, it just feels dirtier. (Pete O'Hanlon)
BTW, in software, hope and pray is not a viable strategy. (Luc Pattyn)
Why are you using VB6? Do you hate yourself? (Christian Graus)
|
|
|
|
|
Dalek Dave wrote: Gold gave me allowances that were denied me as a platinum
Don't you mean the other way around?
Dalek Dave wrote: allow me to work to be a platinum in time
But you already have.
This "new" reputation system is simply long, LONG overdue recognition for what you have already done, what you have already contributed.
You've earned this, Dave, and I ain't takin' it back  cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: I ain't takin' it back
Till the next iteration and the algorithm changes!!
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to Mud member then! ------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
|
|
|
|
|
For me it's the other way around, I used to be Gold now I'm back to silver.
I don't mind that much since I don't see that much difference apart from the fact I no longer have the new articles needing approval right but I'll get there again
What I do find strange tho is that I'm a platinum debator (  ) and since I rarely post anything outside of the programming forums (or QA) I think I shouldn't be platinum or the threshold for it should be higher.
|
|
|
|
|
| I have a huge Debator rating, I suppose that come from all that mass debating! ------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
|
|
|
|
|
Not to forget the drunk posts.
“Follow your bliss.” – Joseph Campbell
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
