|
It says: Post is locked for editing by Chuzhakin. Lock expires in 20 minutes.
|
|
|
|
|
Check now, I don't think thats the case.
Though, I just remember one more thing that could be happening: He might have made it editable only by editors earlier, thus it did not have an approve button for me(or probably you too).
|
|
|
|
|
The status in the header says "Pending", so I'm not sure what's going on with it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The bottom three lines of this page (and some other pages) are no longer centered.
|
|
|
|
|
The line with the icons and shortcuts? Never noticed they were centered in the first place...
If you mean the copyright notice, they are centered now.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Sometimes one answers their own question, so it would be nice to be able to "Answer" your own question.
|
|
|
|
|
Why? You could easily modify the question to include the answer.
|
|
|
|
|
The popular way to do this is to edit the question to add the solution, and then tag the subject with [Solved].
|
|
|
|
|
I fail to see to logic in that; there is one location for a question and another for one or more answers, no matter who the author is. Answering one's own question does not need to be handled differently. Flagging a question as answered is OK, it too should not depend on whom provided the satisfactory answer.
BTW: Removing a question once it is solved is also popular on several sites, IMO it is equally stupid as it removes information that may be useful to others.
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they preserve indentation, improve readability, and make me actually look at the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agreed: I don't think it should be possible to remove any question with an answer, even if you wrote the original question. Happened to me three times yesterday: the OP deleted the question when he had his answer.
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
Digital man: "You are, in short, an idiot with the IQ of an ant and the intellectual capacity of a hose pipe."
|
|
|
|
|
I just said it's a popular way to do it. Not saying it's the best way or that any other way would be wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
I noticed that the "Add an answer" box is labeled differently if you go back and look at your questions. It reads "Add your solution here. That's MUCH better, but see my new mesage in this forum.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010 ----- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010 ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
I was about to agree with you because that's the way I've been doing it, but then I decided to go back to one of my questions, add an answer, and then see if I could "accept" the answer. Imaging my surprise when I found a place to "Add your solution here:" (where the Add an answer" box usually is).
I'm not surprised that you haven't seen that because I don't think you've asked any questions in the Q/A section.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010 ----- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010 ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: Imaging my surprise when I found a place to "Add your solution here:" (where the Add an answer" box usually is).
So what does it do? Posts an answer, but marked clearly as coming from the OP? Or is it just a wording change that posts a regular answer?
|
|
|
|
|
See my newest post in this forum.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010 ----- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010 ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
Dear Sir/Madam,
Please explain why have you deleted my article "SQLServerTipsGuidelines" from CodeProject site?
Collapse
Message shown: "We're Sorry, but the article you are trying to view was deleted at 8 Feb 2011."
Thanks,
Irfan Baig
[Email Removed]
Reference:
SQL Server Performance Tips and Guidelines[^]
IrfiBaig
|
|
|
|
|
You should have received email from a Codeproject admin. Did you check your spam folder? Did you check your settings to verify you have entered the correct email address?
If you haven't received email, you can email them directly at submit@codeproject.com.
|
|
|
|
|
If it was a Tip/Trick, and it was not deleted by a staff editor, I don't think he will get an email for it. I am not 100% sure of this but it seems anyone with enough reputation can delete a Tip/Trick.
|
|
|
|
|
Nishant Sivakumar wrote: it seems anyone with enough reputation can delete a Tip/Trick
I thought this was going to be changed? I might be wrong about this. Anyway, I thought the OP was talking about an article.
|
|
|
|
|
Hans Dietrich wrote: I thought the OP was talking about an article.
You are right. Google cache shows that it was an article and one that was fairly decently rated. 4.26 from 16 votes. I wonder why it was deleted!
|
|
|
|
|
Hans Dietrich wrote: I thought this was going to be changed? I might be wrong about this
Nope, you are not wrong. I don't see even high rep people having an access to delete Tip/Tricks. Just verified, if I can or cannot. Further, I remember, some thread where it was confirmed that nuking some person or deleting/removing an article/blog/tip-trick would be handled by CP staff and even high-rep people would not be given such powers. One can surely report if needed, which we all can do irrespective of rep-power.
|
|
|
|