|
I suspect you are seeing something others cannot because you have "sight beyond sight." Should be OK for most users.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
You calling him fore-eyes? Them sound like fightin' words!
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, I understand now.
Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff
I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman
|
|
|
|
|
... looks bizarre[^].
~RaGE();
I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus
Do not feed the troll ! - Common proverb
|
|
|
|
|
Set the "Show" to more than 3 months.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Ow 
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
It appears I have just voted twice in the current survey (obfuscation). Is that intended behaviour?
Peter Wasser
Art is making something out of nothing and selling it.
Frank Zappa
modified 28-Feb-12 1:23am.
|
|
|
|
|
Your vote the first time was obfuscated. With that said, the system could not read your first vote so it let you vote a second time. I'm sure if you try again, it will let you vote to infinity and beyond.
"the meat from that butcher is just the dogs danglies, absolutely amazing cuts of beef." - DaveAuld (2011)
"No, that is just the earthly manifestation of the Great God Retardon." - Nagy Vilmos (2011)
"It is the celestial scrotum of good luck!" - Nagy Vilmos (2011)
|
|
|
|
|
Different browsers?
I've opened the weekly polls up to non-members so I track votes by cookie, not member ID. Yes, it can be abused, but these things are for fun, and are not a scientific experiment.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
maybe it should be tracked by cookie *and* user ID since it's a source for reputation points. This would allow you to have non-members vote, yet still prevent members from voting more than once.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
When I searched the Lounge for "supercilious", the results were italicized/bold starting with the second result.
Screenshot
I suspect you need to do some more HTML scrubbing with search results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the catch! One was removed
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
Just a quick thought. Instead of showing a 404 can we redirect to the other article with the message 'redirected from' (like Wikipedia)?
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage
Tech Gossips
The woods are lovely, dark and deep,
But I have promises to keep,
And miles to go before I sleep,
And miles to go before I sleep!
|
|
|
|
|
This alternative Tip[^]
shows a message at the bottom of the tip "Unsupported parent type id 8."
The tip is an alternative too
Filtering-records-from-List-based-similar-to-Sql In[^]
Lobster Thermidor aux crevettes with a Mornay sauce, served in a Provençale manner with shallots and aubergines, garnished with truffle pate, brandy and a fried egg on top and Spam - Monty Python Spam Sketch
modified 27-Feb-12 12:28pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for reporting.
All sorted out now
Sincerely,
Elina
Life is great!!!
Enjoy every moment of it!
|
|
|
|
|
So many questions time and time again on the CP Q&A are either not researched or are answered by a few links to Google or CP itself. I believe the following may help curb this issue. I would like to say from the start however that I don't believe it will solve it entirely - nothing ever does when humans are involved... anyway ...
I propose that CP implements a Listbox feature for submitting a question to which a user must add a list of all the places they have tried searching. This means a user must manually input and add the sites they have searched on. It should not include any form of dropdown or suggestions box (even in descriptive text) as this would defeat the point - people would always just quickly select Google without thinking.
Why will this solve the problem? Well it starts by making members required to have written where they have searched. This means posters have actively thought about the issue and so will be more likely to actually search. Secondly, answerers can then take it for granted that the person has searched. If the person obviously hasn't, I think a tougher stance should be taken than is at the moment - the question should be immediately deleted on the basis that (with the new measure) the question is invalid. This will reduce the amount of time wasted by answeres writing the well know words "search Google".
Overall I believe this feature, if implemented properly, could well improve the standard of CP Q&A.
Hope others agree,
Ed
modified 26-Feb-12 17:00pm.
|
|
|
|
|
So, you're proposing that we penalise users. All they will do is type google, and does that prove they actually have? In a lot of cases, they will type in something like asdfg just because it's quick, and deleting their answer will turn users away. Overall, I don't think this is a good idea.
|
|
|
|
|
But is deleting an answer really penalising? I mean you gain points for posting a question then you lose the same again for having it deleted so (in a basic scenario) the user simply hasn't gained anything.
Anyway, you're not the only one who doesn't like it I see so I guess I'll have to put up with poor quality Q&A...rather tedious because I'd love to help a lot of the people that ask, they just don't ask questions properly....hmm...perhaps separate boxes for different bits of the question so that people have to follow guidelines? But you'll only say that people will not use them properly and will fill them extra inputs with junk...
Oh well, I still think something needs to be done though,
Ed
|
|
|
|
|
You aren't talking about deleting an answer. You're talking about deleting a question, and yes that is penalising the user.
|
|
|
|
|
The purpose of the site is to attract developers to ask questions and keep coming back so they can see ads.
When has Chris ever stated that a poorly researched question is a problem for him?
I think it's a bad idea.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Agreed.
Ideological Purity is no substitute for being able to stick your thumb down a pipe to stop the water
|
|
|
|
|
I (and everyone) would like the quality of the questions to be improved and a variation on this suggestion has been discussed (but of course I've been looking and can't find the link!). However, asking members to list sites will result in (as others have said) asfg.com. There's also the case where a question is asking an opinion from CodeProject members specifically which means no previous search has, or needed to be done.
Solutions must ensure that things stay easy for those who try, and guide (or even block) those who simply don't care. I'm more than happy to have less questions (and less page views, less load) and better questions than lots of junk.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Can we upload power point presentations by any way? If there is no feature like this what could be the reason?
Mahmud Hasan
Software Engineer from Bangladesh
|
|
|
|
|
I doubt anybody is going to want to view a powerpoint presentation instead of reading an article.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
