|
Oh come on, for some of us it's the only vote we get!
|
|
|
|
|
+5
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
+5 good buddy.
|
|
|
|
|
Great to see you do a +5.
If my observation is not wrong, you rarely upvote anything. (not that you avoid intentionally, but out of habit)
Forgot to say: Your upvote or appreciation does matter. Thanks for the awesome website and knowledge share.
modified 22-Oct-12 1:45am.
|
|
|
|
|
Very funny, a fiver for you as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The list of articles awaiting moderation appears to be limited to 5 entries, so if a 6th article is submitted, the first one falls out of view until the later ones get cleared out. This has the net effect that when a lot of AppInvention articles are submitted, many await moderation for many more hours than would be normal.
(or maybe I don't know how to show more than 5)
Solution: (a) FIFO (b) show more than 5
modified 22-Oct-12 9:26am.
|
|
|
|
|
FIFO is a bad idea, because a "dodgy" article that no-one wants to approve, but no-one wants to reject either would never leave the queue, and always display. Five of them...
The Competition articles seem to be being passed through pretty quickly, so I (personally) don't think it is a problem. The competition will be over soon so it should cease to be a problem at all fairly quickly. (And I do hope that a better method will be found for competitions like this in future!)
Ideological Purity is no substitute for being able to stick your thumb down a pipe to stop the water
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know Griff, I have two article updates that have been waiting for approval since the 19th. Maybe they're "dodgy"?
|
|
|
|
|
We editors go through the entries and clear them out (one way or another).
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Answer given by Sandeep Mewara,is not showing as updated by "Sandeep Mewara". Is this a bug?
___ ___ ___
|__ |_| |\ | | |_| \ /
__| | | | \| |__| | | /
|
|
|
|
|
What answer, in a forum, Q&A, Articles, on the telephone?
One of these days I'm going to think of a really clever signature.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Which one? There are thousands to choose from.
[edit]
OK, I figured out what you are alluding to.
[/edit]
One of these days I'm going to think of a really clever signature.
modified 20-Oct-12 9:03am.
|
|
|
|
|
+5!
It's not specific for Sandeep Mewara, but if you've a colored name.
My name is italic and red, so it's also not showing for me.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes. You are correct.
___ ___ ___
|__ |_| |\ | | |_| \ /
__| | | | \| |__| | | /
|
|
|
|
|
I was editing a solution on largest prime number[^] and when I selected the Update, the solution was gone!
All I did was embed the code in the solution into the appropriate <pre> tags.
I don't see how I could have deleted the solution.
Any ideas what could have happened?
|
|
|
|
|
All fixed. Looks like someone may have deleted it while you were editing. That should't happen
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
See this thread. Notice one of the messages says "message removed". Here's how that happened.
Marcus posted a reply to the OP. I posted a reply to Marcus. Marcus then posted a reply to mine, indicating he'd delete both his replies. He did so. Since there were no replies to his most recent reply, it vanished. Since my reply still existed, his first reply just said "message removed" rather than vanishing. That's totally as expected so far.
However, I then deleted my reply. As expected, it vanished (since there were no replies to it when I deleted it). However, the the reply Marcus made still remained as "message removed" (not to be expected).
My suggestion is that any deleted messages without replies should vanish, even if they were deleted before their replies (though, they wouldn't vanish until all replies also did so). This could potentially cascade up several levels (even an entire thread).
|
|
|
|
|
That was my mistake and I do know better. Unlike Q&A where I have the privileges of deleting comments/answers that shouldn't be there, I deleted my message before remembering that I can't do that to child messages from other users. My humblest apologies for creating the orphan.
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm anispeptic, frasmotic, even compunctuous to have caused you such pericombobulation. I hope you will accept my most enthusiastic contrafibularities.
In other words, I blame Chris & hamsters, not you.
|
|
|
|
|
Was wondering if anyone at CodeProject can find this source code? Someone alerted me that there is nothing there. Rated the articl a 2 because of it.
WPF Grid Row Iteration[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Did you link to the source code from the article? I looked at the revisions for the article, comparing the first submission with the most recent revision, and I don't see that any links to source code were removed (looks like they never existed).
Also, while they said they voted you a 2, they appear to have not actually voted at all. There are not votes of 2 on your article.
|
|
|
|
|
Dear Admin I just tried to Post a Solution to a Question.
But instead I'm getting this error:
Quote: We have tried to add your answer 3 times without success. Our servers are just a little overworked. Sorry.
Can someone tell me why am I getting this Error.
Note-I've tried multiple times to post.
|
|
|
|
|
The error is self-explanatory. The servers are a little too busy and couldn't process your request.
When that happens to me, I'll wait a couple minutes and then try again. Usually works then.
At the end of the day, it's just one of life's mysteries why the hamsters decide to take a water break right when you want to submit.
Cheers.
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|