|
I'm on Chrome and case doesn't appear to impact the bug.
Reality is an illusion caused by a lack of alcohol
"Nagy, you have won the internets." - Keith Barrow
|
|
|
|
|
Trying in Chrome Canary (v30.0.blah.blah):
- bbb = bbb[^]
- ... = ...[^]
- HHH = HHH[^]
- hhh = http://www.codeproject.com/
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Trying in regular Chrome (v28.0.blah.blah):
- bbb = bbb[^]
- ... = ...[^]
- HHH = HHH[^]
- hhh = http://www.codeproject.com/
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Trying in IE10:
- bbb = bbb[^]
- ... = ...[^]
- HHH = HHH[^]
- hhh = http://www.codeproject.com/
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah I did suspect the h at the start of https might be more than a coincidence.
|
|
|
|
|
Alternating Types in Bound Repeater.
See above tip. It should have a code block that is in C# and VB.NET, like this tip: Call Functions Until One Meets Condition.
Well, not really. They are really both asp.net code blocks, and they each have embedded code of C# and VB.NET. So, for syntax highlighting, I'd like to specify the language as asp.net for both, but the tab of each should say something like "C# ASP.NET" / "VB.NET ASP.NET". I tried setting the languages to C#/VB.NET, but when I click the "VB.NET" tab, the tab functionality completely breaks down.
As far as a fix, maybe allow PRE blocks to have an attribute of "label" that allows each PRE block to have its tab labeled differently than the lang specified.
In the mean time, if an editor could un-bork my tip, that'd be good too.
|
|
|
|
|
It's broken. I was surprised at the way it was coded. I always use JS (Jquery) for tabs etc, But here there's just a hyperlink. How is that going to work
Beauty cannot be defined by abscissas and ordinates; neither are circles and ellipses created by their geometrical formulas.
Source
|
|
|
|
|
I've fixed it.
The trick (and yeah, it's a small trick) is that if you specify the language as C# but the code is clearly ASP.NET (eg starts with a page directive) then the colouriser ignores you and goes into ASP.NET mode.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps it's just me, but the first page in the ASP .NET forum[^] looks weird. I am only seeing 7 posts even though I have "Per page = 50" and "Show = All". When I go to the next page in the forum, it looks normal with 50 posts showing.
I checked it in IE8 and Chrome on my XP SP3 as well as in IE10 on my WP8. Tried switching between Fixed and Fluid layout, pressing Ctrl-F5, but it keeps looking the same.
I checked all other forums, but this is the only one that behaves this way.
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
A long time ago, I saw an icon legend on CP for the message boards, but cannot find it now.
Does it exist?
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
You mean the legend right at the bottom of the forums?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
No I mean the legend that tells what the various user icons mean that are next to the user name in a post.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
If you go to the profile of someone who has a special icon and click on one of those icons, it will take you to this page[^].
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks!
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
"Discussions posted for the Published version of this article."
English is not my first language so I may be mistaken here.
"Bastards encourage idiots to use Oracle Forms, Web Forms, Access and a number of other dinky web publishing tolls.", Mycroft Holmes[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
The author may have unpublished versions of the article. That is all it is talking about.
|
|
|
|
|
My mobile's mail client (I know it's a bit old but...) cannot decipher HTML messages and is only limited to text-only. So, while trying to see any mail from CP, it appears as an HTML attachment. Making me unable to read the content without downloading it and opening it in my browser.
So, I request for including an alternate text-only view with hyperlinks in mails from CP.
Beauty cannot be defined by abscissas and ordinates; neither are circles and ellipses created by their geometrical formulas.
Source
|
|
|
|
|
Go to your profile[^] and under Email Format choose "Text"
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
That sets the format for all the emails. They will only come with text. But what I'm asking is to contain both the text and html bodies in one mail by utilizing alternate mime views. Something like this[^]
Beauty cannot be defined by abscissas and ordinates; neither are circles and ellipses created by their geometrical formulas.
Source
|
|
|
|
|
We were originally going to do this but it means that every email is roughly twice as big, and that means twice the bandwidth. And that's expensive.
Supporting text-only email is, unfortunately, like supporting IE7. We do it, we want to do it, but we have to be practical about the decisions we make for 1% of the population and how they affect the other 99%.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Hmmm... Bandwidth hurts. Fine. I'm getting a new cell next month
Beauty cannot be defined by abscissas and ordinates; neither are circles and ellipses created by their geometrical formulas.
Source
|
|
|
|
|
Hi folks,
I went to review this[^] blog entry, and wanted to write a message to the author describing the formatting issue, but the discussion area didn't exist. In the past, it has always been available for unpublished articles, but this time it just said "Comments are only available once an article is submitted for publishing." I'm not sure what state it's in, but it appeared under "Blogs needing approval" on the home page.
|
|
|
|
|
Tom Clement wrote: discussion area didn't exist
I just went there and it exists for me.... Might be a privileges thing.
|
|
|
|