|
Was going to ask this, too
On the other hand side he is against the custom CSS for our profile, cause it may lead to stuff like Rohan's profile[^]. But still, the custom CSS is there, and usable by people with all differences of taste.
|
|
|
|
|
Marco Bertschi wrote: Rohan's profile
Veni, vidi, abiit domum
|
|
|
|
|
Should i remove that CSS? Change? Valuable suggestions please.I will gladly appreciate it.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
No, leave it, it looks quite interesting.
Veni, vidi, abiit domum
|
|
|
|
|
Richard MacCutchan wrote: looks quite interesting Thanks.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
Should i remove that CSS? Change? Valuable suggestions please.I will gladly appreciate it.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
What I intended to say was that the Custom CSS tends to break the Site's overall style - I assume you like the style, and the profile represents what you like and fits your personality - I just picked you, because eeerr... - You know: It is an outstanding example
On a side note: If a CSS like yours would do any harm the hamsters would already have taken care of that, and removed the Custom CSS setting. So, no need to change it from my POV.
|
|
|
|
|
My eyes! They burn!
I added this feature so members could have some fun, but you're making me regret that decision.
|
|
|
|
|
Hey, please give me that CSS. I'll customize for my profile.
|
|
|
|
|
I have recently removed it from my profile as Chris was not happy with it Well,its there in my system at office. So i will post it to you at Monday morning for sure.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
Before post do anything anywhere, think on all angels angles
|
|
|
|
|
When you have figured out how, then please explain to me.
Veni, vidi, abiit domum
|
|
|
|
|
And do we actually need the Ruby On Rails[^] forum? It doesn't contain a question, only a removed spam message.
|
|
|
|
|
|
That doesn't seems too bad. He is here since 11 months, posted comments, may have logged in regularly and also participated in surveys. 2700 odd points doesn't seems to many for this.
.AK.
|
|
|
|
|
Its not possible at all even we consider Vote,Login,194 comments all together.
How about this one : http://www.codeproject.com/Members/User-7594982[^] ? This account was with these many points just after first day.
It is bug since many days and we reported so many accounts with huge jumps either in Participant or Organiser points.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
Rohan Leuva wrote: How about this one : http://www.codeproject.com/Members/User-7594982[^] ?
This is surely a bad one. Not sure how this many points can be accumulated in so short span. But I stoll feel that the first one can be possible.
.AK.
|
|
|
|
|
Now that Office 365 is out with its blend of desktop and web technologies, I thought it might deserve a forum of its own.
Or is this covered by the SharePoint forum?
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
The goto statement[^] is really a valuable thread, full of contributions added by old developers. I didn't think it would grow as such. I think I touched a deeply controversial topic in the development world.
I suggest that the CodeProject include a vote to know who is with or against the GOTO statement. As per the thread , it seems will fail, but the vote would be a nice thing to try.
If you decided launching such vote pls keep me posted with the result in case I didn't open the site in the vote's day.
|
|
|
|
|
|
thx, I sent the survey suggestion via that link
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add (big)description at top of the article writing forum because newbies posting programming questions there frequently recent days.
|
|
|
|
|
...because people read and follow all instructions carefully?
|
|
|
|