|
Yes I did the first time only, but it didn't add it up...
Srinivas K
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like it double unsubscribed you. Better safe than sorry  All fixed.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Chris,
Thanks for adding my points.
My points before unsubscribe are some where around 2500, even though i again subscribed with my new email ID i didn't get the points added and figure i have previously. After you adding my points still it is less. Please refer the reputation graph for more information and add my points back.
Srinivas K
|
|
|
|
|
I reviewed the reputation events related to the mailouts and they are accurate
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
A small thing, but if you are in that area, can you move the red flag please? The reason is that when you are on the last message on a page & you move the mouse down & right to the Next link, just before you get there, you roll over the flag & by the time you get to the Next link, it is already the Spam context menu entry.
As I say, only a small thing, and as far as I know, I haven't marked anything as spam inadvertently, but it is a petty annoyance.
Regards, Stewart
|
|
|
|
|
Is it possible to recall a message that was "removed" because of pecker-heads?
http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/4726540/Optimization.aspx[^]
This is one of the reasons I have dramatically reduced my participation here. "Reputation" points is nothing but a number, instead of being used for something meaningful, such as making it harder to have a message "automatically removed".
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
modified 23-Dec-13 9:15am.
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: pecker-heads
Getting information off the Internet is like taking a drink from a fire hydrant.
- Mitchell Kapor
|
|
|
|
|
I've reinstated the message.
Rep points are meant to *specifically* give us a tool to pick those who are halfway sensible and should have the power to rid the site of the ferals. However, in any group of people you're always going to get those who abuse the power.
However, in this case it seems you've been the victim of a bug[^] that was introduced with our caching work last week. I'm on it.
|
|
|
|
|
Many thanks oh great and powerful Oz.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
I just flagged five posts this member[^] had in the comments section for various articles (they were all pointing back to an amazing post on his own web site just as his QA Answers do). None of the posts showed any votes prior to my report, but when I refreshed his list of Latest Messages, all five of them were gone.
I actually saw the same thing a few days ago, but that was after I had reported a member in the Spam forum, so I shrugged it off, thinking an Admin might have just topped off on coffee. 
Was that a radioactive hamster that bit me the other day or is there a dangerous bug here?
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
A slap head moment. We had "AutoDeleteSpamMessages" set to true in our settings. This overrode the settings that required a certain number of votes before a message was deleted.
|
|
|
|
|
Glad to help, but I am kind of disappointed. I was banking on the radioactive hamster bite thing and was going to have Hamster-Man T-shirts made. I already had a general idea for my costume. 
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
It seems I got some upvotes on an article, but I don't see extra votes under my article's title.
They were 13 before I went to bed yesterday, I can see in my rep history I got an upvote while I was asleep, but I still only got 13 votes.
I might miss some votes from last evening as well, but I'm not sure.
It also seems that the reputationer does not show the rep increase I got (not sure if I did get them on my CP rep).
I already noticed this before when I just posted my article. The view count of my article did not go up, etc.
This is the article: Querying SQL Server 2012: Part I[^].
I am using Chrome, although I don't think that's the problem.
EDIT:
I just noticed my article overview shows that my article has 16 votes, while my article only shows 14.
It's an OO world.
public class Sander : Lazy<Person>{
public void DoWork(){ throw new NotImplementedException(); }
}
modified 23-Dec-13 9:24am.
|
|
|
|
|
Sander Rossel wrote: They were 13 before I went to bed yesterday
thatrajaCode converters | Education Needed
No thanks, I am all stocked up. - Luc Pattyn
When you're wrestling a gorilla, you don't stop when you're tired, you stop when the gorilla is - Henry Minute
|
|
|
|
|
I know that because someone +5'ed me and left a comment
It's an OO world.
public class Sander : Lazy<Person>{
public void DoWork(){ throw new NotImplementedException(); }
}
|
|
|
|
|
Sander Rossel wrote: +5'ed me and left a comment
The latter can be proven, but the former is only a guess based on what that person wrote in his message.
I even made my virtual vote look like a real one because I used the "General" type message, whereas the poster you are referring to actually posted a "Question" type message. Since you can't choose the type of message when actually voting you can't really be sure that the person voted even if they say so in their message.
It take it you're not just trying to push your article this way. 
Does that sound plausible to you? 
Regards,
— Manfred
"I had the right to remain silent, but I didn't have the ability!"
Ron White, Comedian
|
|
|
|
|
Nope, let me explain in full detail what happened.
So I got an upvote and the voter left a comment. I went to check and had 13 votes total (the vote is also in my rep history).
This morning I checked my rep history and I noticed I got another upvote (big one, +80 points), but the vote total was still 13.
I also did not get the 80 points according to the reputationer.
It's an OO world.
public class Sander : Lazy<Person>{
public void DoWork(){ throw new NotImplementedException(); }
}
|
|
|
|
|
A-ha! I actually just found, when I went to my article overview to check your virtual vote, that my overview shows 16 votes, while my article only shows 14.
So there IS something fishy going on here. And no, I don't try to push my article. Great articles don't need pushing 
It's an OO world.
public class Sander : Lazy<Person>{
public void DoWork(){ throw new NotImplementedException(); }
}
|
|
|
|
|
No, you didn't get what I have said. Read my message again
thatrajaCode converters | Education Needed
No thanks, I am all stocked up. - Luc Pattyn
When you're wrestling a gorilla, you don't stop when you're tired, you stop when the gorilla is - Henry Minute
|
|
|
|
|
It's an OO world.
public class Sander : Lazy<Person>{
public void DoWork(){ throw new NotImplementedException(); }
}
|
|
|
|
|
There's a delay between votes being cast and them showing up on the article's summary due to caching.
|
|
|
|
|
Noted!
I had just never noticed this behaviour before and thought something might be wrong.
It's an OO world.
public class Sander : Lazy<Person>{
public void DoWork(){ throw new NotImplementedException(); }
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I can also see another problem with the contact form: Your phone number is just a bunch of colored squiggles!
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
