|
The alt-text says 'Form me!', whereas I think it should be 'Fork me!'
I only saw this as Firefox failed to load that image for some reason.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
|
|
|
|
|
Well spotted, but I'm slightly disappointed you didn't suggest the other alternative.
Then again lack of sleep has given me the humour of a 12 year old at this point.
Moving on... ahem.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Trying to reply to a post, I select text in the original message and click on the 'quote' button. I get a message box about no text selected. Another odd part of the behavior is that it seemed like you could click on the entire body of the original message and drag it about.
Internet Explorer 11.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Gary R. Wheeler wrote: I select text in the original message and click on the 'quote' button
Just did this on IE11.
Did some of our hamsters escape and make a home for themselves in your machine?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris, I've noticed the same issue if the selected text includes any smilies. If smilies are selected with the text, then the Quote button gives the message that no text is selected.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Ah - thank you. Didn't think to check that.
It's on the TODO[^]
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: Did some of our hamsters escape and make a home for themselves in your machine?
Hmm. Apparently they did.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Hi guys,
Don't know if you guys know tldrlegal.com, but it's a great site to look up and quickly understand software licenses.
It would be great if you could add your CPOL license there.
PS - I have no affiliations with tldrlegal.com what-so-ever. Just a site I constantly refer to..
Best,
Erez
|
|
|
|
|
I just updated my article and uploaded a new version of my zip files: one zip file with executables, and one zip without executables. I've manually removed the bin and obj folders from the noexe-zip, then I uploaded the zip, published the article, but when downloading the noexe-zip from the new version of the article, I see that these folders are added again, but without exe files. Even after trying a second time, the same happened again. This looks like a bug to me. Here is a link to my article.[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Problem confirmed, same effect here.
~RaGE();
I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus
Entropy isn't what it used to.
|
|
|
|
|
The no-exe version is created automatically. You're noexe is getting overwritten by our noexe.
Oh no.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, thanks, that explains the problem. I was able to fix it by changing the -noexe part of the file name into _no-exe .
|
|
|
|
|
this Guy[^] posted a spam message[^]. After I reported him, I've seen that he was reported 10 times, but is still there.
I will never again mention that Dalek Dave was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel.
|
|
|
|
|
Not a bug. See here[^].
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
Seen that - But IRCC previously were 5 kicks needed to ban a member, so the account should be gone with the 10th kick ?
I will never again mention that Dalek Dave was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel.
|
|
|
|
|
You're assuming they're 10 of the same type. If 9 people report a member with the "Spammer" option, and 1 reports with the "Abusive / Troll" option, that's not 10 kicks.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Then it would still be a bug, just in another way
I will never again mention that Dalek Dave was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel.
|
|
|
|
|
He looks to be gone now. It just takes some time.
Just because the code works, it doesn't mean that it is good code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Even you hadn't been here for a year, you may remember that cross posting not much tolerated...Be patient it's a weekend for most CPians, so things are move a bit slowly. More, you kind of question is requires CP staff - which make it a bit slower...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
thanks for your response
|
|
|
|
|
I was "improving question" on Object Reference is required for the non-static field?[^] to wrap the source code with <pre lang="c#"> but when I did, part way through the code, in the middle of the line, it just stopped rendering the code (it just skips it) to the </pre> tag.
There's nothing particularly unusual in the line where it stops.
I even deleted and re-entered that line of code, with no effect.
Just to check, I changed the lang="c#" to be "lang="text".
Now it displays all of the code, but of course, it doesn't use c# highlighting.
|
|
|
|
|
I have commented the line...
return "<a href="\".*\"">(?<name>.*)</a>";
Seems like an issue with special characters.
|
|
|
|