|
Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov wrote: see my other drawings Of course - I took your advice seriously...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
Sergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
There's always the option of submitting an article directly to an editor. For something like this we will look after it and ensure it's all good.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I understand it, thank you very much. I'm talking about a particular glitch: the links to uploaded files tends to be broken after some legitimate step. Sorry my report is not 100% accurate, as I did not experiment with submission or tested it. I have an impression that the files were correctly referenced on first submission and get broken on the original page when the second version was created. Interestingly, when second version was approved, adding other versions did not disrupt anything.
Anyway, as of today, my immediate goal is reached: the article integrity is preserved (I don't dare to say it has no more mistakes) and is dated by 1st of April, just as planned.
Thank you,
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
The popup to share with Google+ disappears before you can hit the public button and the article does not shows on Google+...
[UPDATE - 01-04-2014]
After a long fight I was able to share it on Google+, but the image CodeProject pushed is one of the images from the article and not the standard CodeProject image...
[END-OF-UPDATE]
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
modified 1-Apr-14 12:21pm.
|
|
|
|
|
It has been a while since I voted an article but now I am getting this message. How do I get my email address confirmed? May be this is also the reason why I have not been getting email alerts when someone posts questions in my articles.
|
|
|
|
|
There should be a link in the message that takes you to the "send me a new confirmation email" page.
In any case I've sent a reconfirmation request. Should be in your inbox right now.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the instant response! I just got the confirmation request you sent and my email address is confirmed now. Hope I will start getting email alerts for article questions.
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like you email is confirmed, so our systems should no longer be scared about sending emails to a non-existent address. Let me know if you get a notification for this message.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I got an email alert for your reply. Thanks Chris.
|
|
|
|
|
How do I edit my signature line? I found it a long time ago but cannot find it now.
Thank you.
Thanks for your time
If you work with telemetry, please check this bulletin board: http://www.bkelly.ws/irig_106/
|
|
|
|
|
Go to your account settings page (Name in top right > My Settings) and click on the 'Forums' tab.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks. Nice signature yourself.
Thank you for your time
If you work with telemetry, please check this bulletin board: www.irigbb.com
|
|
|
|
|
No problem. And thanks as well.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
|
|
|
|
|
I just posted a comment to a Quick Answers question and was rewarded by near blindness as my comment was rendered with a bright yellow background. May I suggest a more subtle shade of attention?
Thanks,
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
There is an algorithm that is used. The brighter your comment, the brighter the color used. Consider it a compliment
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
In that case the background should've been black.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
Damn you CSS Specificity!
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: CSS Specificity
Try saying that after a few beers!
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
I am still trying to say Intransigence[^] without having had any .
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
It's not good ... just spat all over my keyboard
|
|
|
|
|
Some of the latest changes on the site have made it more difficult to do certain things from a Windows Phone 8 device because any kind of mouse-hover operation is very difficult to execute.
- The new feature in QA where the report flag and other controls are hidden until hovering the mouse over the area.
- Accessing the moderation queue through the new pop-up.
When I access the site from my phone, I normally do it in Desktop mode. I just tried accessing the mobile version, but I cannot see myself using that at all - sorry.
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
Me too - I've given up trying to view via phone - Android - Galaxy S4
|
|
|
|
|
I don't really have any problem browsing the site with my Android tablet: even this post was made with it.
I run it in "Full site" mode (which it forgets periodically) but other than that and Androids annoying auto correct which always assumes I mean coffee when I try to write "coffee" "coffee" *farrrrkkkkk* "code" *thank you Google* I don't have a problem.
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
Apple's autocowreck is even worse. I get things like Code -> Apple and Error -> Hamburger. I have it turned off.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
|
|
|
|