|
Sean Ewington wrote: removes shirt* Oh lord, he's displaying the nipple tassles in public again. Dear sweet mercy, the crowd have just reported that he's wearing a llama-skin codpiece. They're lining up with the pitchforks as we speak.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you. Now please send mind bleach.
I will never again mention that Dalek Dave was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel.
How to ask a question
|
|
|
|
|
Everyone does errors. OG was right, it was a Bug. Not in The code, but in The staff.
I will never again mention that Dalek Dave was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel.
How to ask a question
|
|
|
|
|
That's not software, that's wetware.
|
|
|
|
|
*Silent scream*
You can't leave my head free from those images, can you?
I will never again mention that Dalek Dave was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel.
How to ask a question
|
|
|
|
|
I think you need to look up the definition of wetware. We've just had a very disturbing glimpse into your reality.
|
|
|
|
|
My reality is that I just heard a bald-headed PM say "I can do that as well". After a girl from his team was adjusting her hair to a somewhat... special kind of hair style - Mind you, that dude hasn't a beard
In addition, I automatically assumed that it got a bit creepy since Sean is involved.
I will never again mention that Dalek Dave was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel.
How to ask a question
|
|
|
|
|
OFFICIAL: Are there any women here today?
CROWD: No. No. No. No...
OFFICIAL: Very well. By virtue of the authority vested in me--
CULPRIT WOMAN stones MATTHIAS
MATTHIAS: Oww! Lay off! We haven't started yet!
OFFICIAL: Come on! Who threw that? Who threw that stone? Come on.
CROWD: She did! She did! He did! He! He. He. Him. Him. Him. Him. He did.
CULPRIT WOMAN: Sorry. I thought we'd started.
OFFICIAL: Go to the back.
CULPRIT WOMAN: Oh, dear.
~RaGE();
I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus
Entropy isn't what it used to.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option 2:
Soemtimes, depends how I feel
Should be:
Sometimes, depends how I feel
|
|
|
|
|
As seen in this image[^], there is an error with the main menu's Z-Order settings.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
|
|
|
|
|
Which browser?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I just finished an little Tip on how controls can be customized with Qt-QML, something I needed to do for the GUI study of the ::Tasks app (If it interests you, have a glance: Apply a custom default style on QML controls[^]) - It then came to my mind that we don't have a section for Qt Technology related articles (See also my post below about the additional tags), and that it would be great to have a subsection "Qt" under "Cross-plattform". I'd be happy to update the section of the Qt stuff I have published so far and help to fill this new category a bit.
I also did a little search, and from my POV there is a lot of interesting Qt stuff around which can't be found easily yet, since most of it is hidden within different categories.
I will never again mention that Dalek Dave was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel.
How to ask a question
|
|
|
|
|
This will be done!
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Can we have the following additional tags regarding Qt development:
- QML
- Qt {small 't', because QT means QuickTime}
- Qt C++
I will never again mention that Dalek Dave was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel.
How to ask a question
|
|
|
|
|
These are added automatically when you use them while posting an article or question.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Not exactly a bug, but you might to want to consider and it's annoying to see such crappy content on home page.
So, I opened the home page and wanted to look at Latest News, Discussions etc.
And what I see is this.
Latest Discussions[^]
However when I clicked on the links, it appeared that they were deleted from the CodeProject but Home Page still was showing them.
Btw, shouldn't there be some kind of smart filter which decides what goes to home page.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
The homepage is cached so as soon as it's updated (just a few minutes) those entries will be removed.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
OK, that's an odd one. Added to the TODO[^]
Thanks David.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
The text of the menu button disappears when you mouse over the "home" menu.
Happens in IE 11 and FF 28.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I tried the "new version" for the first time, and ... it's still not brilliant.
It doesn't match the template: so when the template says "code blocks should look like this" I still had to manually edit the HTML to get them to look that way. But, that's not what I was here for...
When I am writing an article, I tick the "work in progress" button for obvious reasons, and when I want a break I press "Save this version". And it complains: "Content is too short or default" - with no clue as to what content it is complaining about. OK, I'm getting used to this, and know it's the sections at the bottom that I haven't got to yet, but...if it's not for publication yet, why would I need to fill this in?
All it's going to do is confuse new authors (just like it did me the first time I met it: I assumed that the message meant I couldn't save it yet because the whole article was too short)
All it needs is a check added: "Is this for publication yet?" No, ok - don't check the default material.
(And if you could get the Publish/Save button text to match the checkbox when you reopen it, that would be nice as well! )
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
I writing my 5th article with it (and also added some code via CM )...
For the code block...What kind of manual edit you have to do? I added countless code blocks with no problem (I may missed something?).
The rest of your complain is painfully true, but not really related to the editor. There is some code that checks if you have default code in your article...
By the way, did you used the full screen mode? I love it...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|