|
Yes, exactly that one. I was searching a Message of Chris or Mathew, and was Sean's
But the title has it, I need glasses
Thanks
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
We had discussed this in past,but it would be great if little change in reporting mechanism takes place like if n number of protectors report the account, then it gets closed. No 10 reports required.
Now a days,what happens is sometime there is huge list of posts on SA watch and some of them gets missed by some of the members and hence spammers are getting long life.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
Did you saw the new link of 'X Messages need moderation'?
If you report a message there as spam it will be removed and the member too...No matter how many reports he got earlier...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
I saw that queue but the message was not spam so i approved it and link was gone. BTW, thanks for letting me know.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
1. I had a case when reporting the spam in the list (using the bin-trash icon) didn't responded, so I hit it a few times until got response ( )...Every hit created a 1 rep-point worth entry in my reputation list (but only one down-vote) - see lines 2-6
2. When I report a message in the list as not-spam I also got an entry that states I posted a message - see first line
error.png (42.1 KB)
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the report. Should be fixed now.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Voting doesn't seem to working at the moment - I voted for Fast Implementations of Sparse Sets in C++[^], and it still says '0.00 (No votes)', even after several attempts ...
Espen Harlinn
Chief Architect - Powel AS
Projects promoting programming in "natural language" are intrinsically doomed to fail. Edsger W.Dijkstra
|
|
|
|
|
It might be caching. I think the vote was actually registered, because the article has 5 stars on the list of articles of the author[^].
The quick red ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog> .
|
|
|
|
|
ProgramFOX wrote: I think the vote was actually registered
Good
ProgramFOX wrote: because the article has 5 stars on the list of articles of the author
A minor delay then ...
Espen Harlinn
Chief Architect - Powel AS
Projects promoting programming in "natural language" are intrinsically doomed to fail. Edsger W.Dijkstra
|
|
|
|
|
The BOLD font looks too heavy on the lists. I switched it to 'normal' in the dev console and it looks better, more like the front page. Makes for a cleaner looking page. Less 90's
|
|
|
|
|
...and now?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is being it's usual PITA.
How about a "special page" for protectors.
Any user who gets a Protector report of "Spammer" gets shunted there, and all his future posts require moderation. If a second protector decides it was a mistake, he gets removed from the "moderate" list. If a second protector decides it wasn't, he gets deleted.
If nothing else, it would slow them down, and might help with our poor tired mouse fingers...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I like the idea!
modified 4-Jan-15 6:40am.
|
|
|
|
|
If you upvote a suggestion it climbs higher on the to-do (to-check) list of the hamsters...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
|
modified 4-Jan-15 8:30am.
|
|
|
|
|
If you upvote a suggestion it climbs higher on the to-do (to-check) list of the hamsters...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not a moderator, but have all the sympathy to your mouse...
I think that this 'quarantine' should include also the currently posted messages of the reported spammer - so those messages will not mess with the QA question list...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: poor tired mouse fingers..
Speak for yourself, my fingers are quite big.
|
|
|
|
|
Agree. Voted up!
How can I join Protector's club?
|
|
|
|
|
It's not a club you join: it's a club you get invited into by the staff as it gives certain powers not allowed to non-protectors.
They expanded the numbers pretty recently, so I wouldn't expect any more new ones for a while yet.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Question for you - it's been suggested by Rohan Leuva that I shouldn't be deleting the spam from Q&A, just reporting it. What do you do?
|
|
|
|
|
In QA, I report the author and delete the spam.
It's a public place, so the shorter the time it's there (and it can take a while to close it via spam reports alone) the less benefit the spammer gets from it, so the less likely they should be to keep coming back.
Besides, when there are a few of 'em working together they can post faster than we can report, and that "hides" everything else from genuine enquirers.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
That's what I've been doing too. Thought I'd check it out, so thanks for the reply.
|
|
|
|