|
Message Removed
modified 14-Feb-15 11:38am.
|
|
|
|
|
This week's survey seems to require at least one check, how do I indicate "none of the above"?
|
|
|
|
|
OK, fair enough. This survey was spurred by a long, long conversation Matthew and I had about the meaning of "unexpected". I honestly didn't think a "none of the above" would count in this one but yes, an oversight.
Too late now I'm afraid.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I had just published the below article and have some concerns to discuss on the Auto save feature.
After publishing the article, I was surprised by the article revision. Every auto save is creating a new revision which I did not see that happening previously.
Alamode and Raspberry PI[^]
Thanks,
Ranjan.D
|
|
|
|
|
ProgramFOX beat you by two days[^]!
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry I didn't realized that the issue was already posted.
Ranjan.D
|
|
|
|
|
I've toggled down the frequency of auto-saves.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
better safe than sorry.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I'm not against auto-save. But I'm not comfortable of having too many draft revisions. It will bring confusion for your next update and to rollback if something wrong happens.
Wonde Tadesse
modified 10-Feb-15 16:31pm.
|
|
|
|
|
No, not enough.
Turns out our Diff algorithm isn't working as well as we'd hoped. I'll switch to a different version.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Great. Waiting the new change.
Wonde Tadesse
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interesting one.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
---
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
---
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
Very old Thing, it is since a long time like this
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I just came across a Tip with 208 revisions, all done in one day[^]. I found that pretty weird, and when looking at the revisions list, I saw that there are a lot of "Auto-save" records (not only for this Tip, but for all recent articles and tips). But when you want to look at the 'actual' revisions of the Article/Tip, then the auto-save records are noise.
Can they please be hidden from the revisions list and from the revisions number (the number in the sidebar)?
The quick red ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog> .
|
|
|
|
|
Done
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Message Removed
modified 9-Feb-15 12:53pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hello!
I'm writing a question in the Q&A and while I'm doing that, having a 24" wide display I do have half of it unused (right part) and, as the question is long and it has a lot of code I can't see it easily while editing as I can't see the results of what I'm doing.
So my suggestion is: could it be possible to define the layout per each user? the ones with 4:3 displays could choose to have it like it is now, while the ones with 16:9 could decide to have the editing area side by side with the preview area.
Keep up the great work!
|
|
|
|
|
Joan Murt wrote: So my suggestion is: could it be possible to define the layout per each user?
No.
The correct way to handle this is simply to rework the page to be responsive. On narrow screens it's portrait, on wide screens (or when you resize the browser window to make it wide) it converts to landscape.
Possible, but unfortunately a little low on our list. I'll add it to the TODO though.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you very much Chris!
That's more than enough!
|
|
|
|
|
The clickety I've added seems to be being pre-pended with either www.codeproject.com or a path to the current message. This is only happening to the non-take me away from this site/target=blank/ [^] one.
|
|
|
|
|
Testing - adding the protocol seems to fix it...
|
|
|
|
|
Article editor crashes in IE when I'm scrolling using the scrollbar attached to the editor, not the page.
This has been a problem for some time - and it's rather annoying.
Espen Harlinn
Chief Architect - Powel AS
Projects promoting programming in "natural language" are intrinsically doomed to fail. Edsger W.Dijkstra
|
|
|
|