|
Shouldn't the last question be checkbox's instead of radio buttons? Seems it's multiple choice answer to me.
Tom
|
|
|
|
|
Sometimes you have to take a decision, particularly for such vital issues 
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
@chris-maunderr , @sean-ewington
Just wanted to check if people are allowed to be in CP even if they don't contribute much in technical discussion.
The below thread's response states that its abusive/troll if we are just hanging only in Lounge (non technical ) forum and it will incur the wrath of protectors.
If that is the case, I will prefer to exit voluntary rather than having been booted out.
cheers,
Super
------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it
|
|
|
|
|
I'm guessing a significant portion of CP members create an account, download code, read a newsletter from time to time, and never ever contribute anything to the site be it a comment, upvote, downvote, article, or whatever. And I love each and every one of those users very, very much.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
So its Business as usual 
cheers,
Super
------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it
|
|
|
|
|
super wrote: The below thread's response states that its abusive/troll if we are just hanging only in Lounge
Sorry, but that's crap.
We have a ton of members who hang out in the Lounge. And we love them. They contribute wit, commentary, and personality. CodeProject wouldn't be what it is without many of these members.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you .
cheers,
Super
------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like we need protecting from the "Protectors"
Gary Kirkham
Only in silence the word,
only in dark the light,
only in dying life:
bright the hawk's flight
on the empty sky.
|
|
|
|
|
Gary Kirkham wrote:
Looks like we need protecting from the "Protectors" |
Protectors can do nothing with someone's account. Some people have lack of info and they are misleading others.
Programmer : A machine that converts coffee into code !
|
|
|
|
|
Protectors can close accounts.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: Protectors can close accounts
Single Protector? Apart from this discussion, if possible would you please confirm that the account in discussion yesterday was not closed by two members?
Programmer : A machine that converts coffee into code !
modified 21-Jul-15 9:25am.
|
|
|
|
|
|
super wrote: and it will incur the wrath of protectors
I am not feeling involved, but to avoid missunderstandings. I would ask you to avoid generalizations.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
My account was closed because of one question is marked as spam by 12 person,but that question is related to programming and easily understand by technical people,if they not understand can comment that question is not understand,but simply marked as spam,i don't know,pls can u activate my old account(Aravindb) ?
Account details
Display or user name is :Aravindb
and below link is my question asked by me,if u feel this not spam than activate my old code project account.
How to rename table using vb.net code ?[^]
If i am not try anything simply i ask question may be this is reason,i thought first ask question later can explain with my workouts,but within one day it will mark as spam.
So pls activate my old account ,i except right solution
Regards
Aravindb1
modified 20-Jul-15 6:33am.
|
|
|
|
|
Shirley the people who close accounts for innocuous questions like this are actually the real abusers of the site.
|
|
|
|
|
No. The real abusers are those who contribute nothing to this site and come here just to enjoy on Lounge/Soapbox and to play blah blah blah leagues. Such people should be restricted to farcebook only. They can find better friends there.
Programmer : A machine that converts coffee into code !
|
|
|
|
|
 Touched a nerve I see. So you have no justification for why you reported a member for an innocuous question?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yep. Just as I thought. He didn't break any of the Codeproject rules, he broke 'Rohans'rules.
Do you not consider the detrimental effect your over-zealous actions could have on this site?
|
|
|
|
|
P0mpey3 wrote: he broke 'Rohans'rules
Don't be stupid. Show some level of maturity in order to have a fruitful discussion. I told you in past and again i'm repeating, don't be personal. If you think his account should be reactivated, email Chris or Sean.Further, i don't even care to answer your questions.
Discussion ends here.
Programmer : A machine that converts coffee into code !
|
|
|
|
|
It is not personal it is the truth. He did not break a Codeproject rule, yet you yourself decided to ban him anyway.
Rohan Leuva wrote: If you think his account should be reactivated, email Chris or Sean.
You really think that is the solution to your over-zealous voting?
|
|
|
|
|
Hello sir,
Thanks,thanks for your support ..... 
|
|
|
|
|
No problem 
|
|
|
|
|
By this standard, I will get the boot soon. I hope I am not pushed out of CP
cheers,
Super
------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it
|
|
|
|
|
super wrote: By this standard, I will get the boot soon. I hope I am not pushed out of CP
You won't because you don't make useless/personal arguments...
Programmer : A machine that converts coffee into code !
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
