|
This is the current configuration setting for my message forum, but eventhough "Active?" and "Users can reply to messages?" are checked (denoted by the Xs) nobody seems to be able to see the Reply link at the bottom of my message. I've had ThatRaja try it twice but to no avail.
X Active?
Closed?
Read Only?
Private?
Allow message rating?
Users can post new messages?
X Users can reply to messages?
Allow Anonymous posts?
Blog format?
Requires Confirmed Email to participate?
Can somebody tell me what I'm doing wrong here?
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
Sticky messages cannot have replies
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Well that about explains it. Thank you very much!
A message that I've removed is still visible to me, is this by design?
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, only you can see it, but it is not visible to others.
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
CCC League Table Link
CCC Link[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
Dalek Dave wrote: Yes, only you can see it, but it is not visible to others.
No DD, I can see that here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Ha-ha! Just kidding!
Actually I'd like to suggest a new message type icon for "recipes". Maybe a bowl with a spoon? Something like that.
|
|
|
|
|
Or a packet with 2 lines of instructions on it?
What sort of situation are you thinking?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
As we have a Lounge for general chat, shouldn't we have a Kitchen for all the cookery entries?
|
|
|
|
|
I was just thinking that: Coder's Cuisine or something, to prove we're not all pizza and Mountain Dew.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gasp!!! Do you really think Chuck Norris would hang out in a wanky forum called Coder's Cuisine?
I think not!
If we can talk about things like unfritzing a TV and soccer [puke] and cricket [double puke] in the lounge, then a recipe or two fits right in. At least eating is something everyone does, and is totally KSF.
|
|
|
|
|
But with this crowd, I'm a little worried that all the recipes will begin with "Get all the bacon you can find"...
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
My bacon fat cookies are to die for.
|
|
|
|
|
Should'nt bookmarking a message / answer be 1 point? 2 points seem a little high.
After all, a vote is valued at 1 point.
The funniest thing about this particular signature is that by the time you realise it doesn't say anything it's too late to stop reading it.
My latest tip/trick
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voting is often a casual "why not" thing. Bookmarking means you care more about it than just liking it - you want to refer to it later.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
The linkifier seems to be acting strangely.
In The Lounge I was attempting to paste a link to this[^]
I typed 'Susannah York', highlighted it, as I have done many times before, and pasted the link. I got variously:
Susannah York[^]
or
Susannah York[^]
Henry Minute
Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain
Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?"
“I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”
I wouldn't let CG touch my Abacus!
|
|
|
|
|
I've tried both pasting and manual linification in IE, FF and Chrome and all worked fine.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Seems to be fine for me too now.
Henry Minute
Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain
Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?"
“I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”
I wouldn't let CG touch my Abacus!
|
|
|
|
|
All done.
---------
You won't see anything actually happen for a few hours since the procedure does all the calculations behind the scenes then swaps out the new set of scores for the old set, but for all those with questions, complaints, observations, threats of bodily violence, or questions, please be patient and wait until the recalc is done.
Please note that the recalculation will not affect your article count, your message count, the email system, the shade of orange, the number of votes you get, your pet's disposition to you, the flouride in your tap water, sunspot activity or any unusual tidal action.
We're just going through all events that have occurred and calculating the points.
Changes in this final iteration: debator points have been trimmed. I know this is fine tuning a result after the horse has bolted, to mix metaphors, but it's the article authors and question answerers who are the ones who should be stars here. There will be no further adjustment of this.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
modified on Sunday, January 16, 2011 11:18 PM
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: You won't see anything actually happen for a few hours since the procedure does all the calculations behind the scenes then swaps out the new set of scores for the old set, but for all those with questions, complaints, observations, threats of bodily violence, or questions, please be patient and wait until the recalc is done.
who's that?
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: it's the article authors and question answerers who are the ones who should be stars here
It's who we are.
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: but it's the article authors and question answerers who are the ones who should be stars here. There will be no further adjustment of this
*Crying in Happiness*
|
|
|
|
|
I've tried three or four times to post an answer to this question:
http://www.codeproject.com/Questions/146694/MS-SQL-CONNECTION.aspx[^]
And they aren't showing up when I go back to the Q/A page, nor when I go back to the question. In the interest of completeness, I'm also not seeing the points for answering the question in my Recent Rep Points list.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010 ----- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010 ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|