|
Chris Maunder wrote: But no. The joke has passed.
Wouldn't have worked anyway - no joke icon
Oh I understood the reasoning, I just thought I'd take the opportunity to be on the <expletive> other side of the conversation for once.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: The fact that I've seen no rants other than "bring back the joke icon!" is
telling
Irony hurts when it hits you in the head like a metal 2x4...
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010 ----- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010 ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
It's sh*t, put it back.
Michael Martin
Australia
"I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible."
- Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for you input. CodeProject values and respects the feedback we get from our members and your message has entered the queue and will be reviewed by the first available Customer Satisfaction Manager.
Where it will be filed appropriately.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: Thank you for you input. CodeProject values and respects the feedback we get
from our members and your message has entered the queue and will be reviewed by
the first available Customer Satisfaction Manager. Where it will be
filed appropriately.
You complete prick you.
Michael Martin
Australia
"I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible."
- Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004
|
|
|
|
|
Mycroft Holmes wrote: I'm going to be a typical user now and argue with you over the choice of colours, changing the highlight from red to green, someone has either been reading a psych book or decided green is positive and red is negative, go figure.
... and I'm going to post an answer just too see a new sexy quotation frame. aaach...
Greetings - Jacek
|
|
|
|
|
What does the 'Mew' & 'Sigma' means/signify in the votes panel in Q&A. When I take my mouse over stars, we see bars and below some value related to 'Mew' & 'Sigma'... was new to me... seeing it from two days now. Anyone?
|
|
|
|
|
I'd say it it is the mean (µ) and sigma is the standard deviation[^], but I also may be wrong and the hamsters are trying to tell us something completely different!
Cheers!
|
|
|
|
|
Mean and standard deviation. Used to filter outlier votes.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
So you mean it is intentionally put up and displayed to us?
|
|
|
|
|
Yep - for those of us who love stats.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Oh great! Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: Yep - for those of us who love stats.
I suppose with almost 8 million users there have to be a few of them, but do we really need to openly acknowledge their existence?
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
How did this this guy[^] even get this account created?
|
|
|
|
|
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
whatwhat?
|
|
|
|
|
Greetings - Jacek
|
|
|
|
|
|
With help from CPAM3, I did the math and my net rating change on articles was +7.55 rating points, and tips went up by 0.68. Five articles went down in rating, 30 articles went up, and five tips went up.
The change was not so dramatic as to cause any concern.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010 ----- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010 ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
Excellent, and as expected.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
The only down-side is that you haven't figured out how to improve people's sense of humor.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010 ----- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010 ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
Have you been tweaking that code? I noticed that several of my articles were reduced in rating with no new associated votes being cast.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010 ----- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010 ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
Yes - I expanded the accepted deviation from the mean a little to ensure that votes either side of the mean were being counted. Thus, if you have any articles with a bunch of 5s and a few 4s, those 4s are being counted whereas in the first iteration they weren't.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Seriously speaking if person A has a lot of 5s for his article and and someone gives him 4. If it is not counted due to filtering he will still have round 5 but his article's popularity will not grow. Then when a lot of people give him 4s, his rating will drop but his popularity will jump up. I am no sure it is logical.
Nick Polyak
|
|
|
|
|
I'm calculating popularity off the filtered set of votes. I guess using the total number of votes in the Log10 part of the calc makes sense because even if someone is downvoting it's still popular. Popular for trolls...
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|