|
|
For lazy moderators like me. Sorry for this suggestion.
Followup to this thread - Moderation - Multiple options[^]
So, provide checkboxes there to select multiple options. And provide textboxes for additional comments for each options. And give a link 'Post it as a comment to article', after clicking this link it should add comments(specific version section) to article.
Needs help
[O] Format / layout issues [ Code-block is broken, Invalid alignments]
[ ] Wrong section / tags [ ]
[O] Wrong type (tip, blog, article)[ Post it as Tip/Trick]
[ ] Missing images/downloads [ ]
[ ] Images/downloads are offsite [ ]
Post it as a comment to article
After submit, below is comments to article.
- Format / layout issues - Code-block is broken, Invalid alignments
- Wrong type (tip, blog, article) - Post it as Tip/Trick
I'm sure you could achieve this by using 'My Vote of 5 way' when we vote articles by selecting the Rating.
thatrajaCode converters | Education Needed
No thanks, I am all stocked up. - Luc Pattyn
When you're wrestling a gorilla, you don't stop when you're tired, you stop when the gorilla is - Henry Minute
|
|
|
|
|
How about Poor Content?
|
|
|
|
|
When using the links for the Code Project Discussions in this mornings Daily news I get an empty Lounge page.
I tried this in IE 10 and Firefox 26, same thing.
It was broke, so I fixed it.
|
|
|
|
|
There seems to be a lot of pagination link breakage that's been occuring since Fri.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
After posting several replies in the lounge this very morning, the returned page has not been page 0 and yet the famous first/previous links are dead. Dead as a Jeffrey Bernard portraying actor.
speramus in juniperus
|
|
|
|
|
Same problem here, and not just in the Lounge.
[Firefox 26, Win7 x64]
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
As I'm a Chromius, it must be a bad case of 'Sean in the Code Base'
speramus in juniperus
|
|
|
|
|
It's happening in other forums too, I posted in C# and the page I got back wasn't starting at the first thread like it should be (I replied on the first page). Also you don't necessarily have to post, just trying to scroll back through the Lounge I got a blank thread list attempting to visit the Next page after page 2.
|
|
|
|
|
That's a relief, thought it was just me.
Also when clicking on Notification links in emails etc, get taken to a page with only two or 3 message posts, of which none are the message I was expecting to go to.
I smell broken....(not me personnally smelling that is!)
|
|
|
|
|
When the get pished at CP rowers, they get PISHED!
speramus in juniperus
|
|
|
|
|
Since the point of a spammer is to post links, how about a new low-level privilege that the user has to have in order to post a Q&A or general forum post that contains a link (or lets say a link outside CP)? Maybe something like completing a profile or having an answered, accepted question.
If the post contains a link, the posting page should say "your post contains a hyperlink to a site outside of CP, please remove the link before posting", and not allow the post to be created with the link.
Maybe that will help cut down on the livestream spammers?
|
|
|
|
|
|
It happens every once in a while, scares me too.
|
|
|
|
|
Was that your MOHI for the next 6 months?
(Moment of High Impact)
|
|
|
|
|
And then some
|
|
|
|
|
True. But is it a good idea?
[Of course it is, but it's Monday and I have to be silly.]
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
A problem with this is that if a message contains links as part of a code dump then we are stopping someone from legitimately posting a question. That's bad. We could limit URLs to PRE blocks only, but enough spammers have included their entire message in a PRE block to make the process a little pointless.
This one needs to go back to the drawing board.
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, how about scrubbing the link before posting, something like:
User attempts to post a question with a link.
System notices a link, scrubs it, then presents it back to the user saying "all links have been scrubbed, please verify before posting".
Insert a placeholder where link was scrubbed, like "link-removed"
User posts with scrubbed link.
That would be able to work inside and outside of pre-tags, most posts with links in pre tags don't access anything the responder would be interested in clicking anyway (usually local network links).
|
|
|
|
|
Not sure what you mean: User posts, system replaces links with placeholder and then invites user to repost with links put back in place?
Spammers are often humans. This won't actually stop them.
|
|
|
|
|
No...
User creates a post with a link. User hits submit.
Page notices the post contains a link. It replaces the link with "link-removed" and then before posting it, it displays a warning to the user that links are not allowed and have been removed.
If the user is OK with it, they hit post. Since links have been removed and replaced with "link-removed", the page posts. If the user puts the link back in, the page shouldn't allow it to post until the links are removed.
The user shouldn't be able to post any links until they get that privilege. This can remove links inside pre tags, usually when a user posts a link in a QA its to a local site or somewhere that people aren't interested in clicking anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
USers may need to post links - or at least URLS - when they are doing things like posting code snippets that are XML and contain schema URLs, or HTML snippets that contain javascript or CSS file includes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Someone voted a 3 in one of my answer today in QA.And guess what, surprisingly found that was a down-vote. So probably CP adds this new feature and don't like anything neutral, either excellent or worst.
But i think that is not very fair, vote 3 shouldn't count as a dowvote as it was earlier, at least something needs to exist btn very good and very bad,
Shuvro
|
|
|
|
|
Send me a link to the answer, please. A vote of 3 is specifically meant to be neutral, a non-event.
|
|
|
|