|
|
Snehasish_Nandy wrote: being a professional doing such stuffs really pathetic.
pathetic? We are open to down vote anything which seems incomplete or inappropriate.You can down vote any content over here if you feel its not appropriate etc. e.g. route planning algorithm[^]
I would have downvoted this one,but i didn't. Some of your answers were down voted by me with reports. You have habit of copying the title of the question and paste it into google,then posting links to that as answer. Go through your own answers list and you will feel it. All the times,its not necessary that OP failed to find the answer through google.
Well,after these many times being banned,don't you still understand that you can not make money out of the reputation points? Well,many members(including you) know what i am talking about.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
Oh...rohan...so you mean to say down voting is the solution..
and then again i don't have problem in down voting until an unless it's genuine and the person down voting have the courage to state the reason in the comment box.
|
|
|
|
|
Snehasish_Nandy wrote: the person down voting have the courage to state the reason in the comment box
We are not here to show "courage". I stated what i meant by down voting the answers[I am not sure whether you are getting notification about report or not]. I also posted you example link of the answer on how unclear it is.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
and Rohan i m really impressed by the contribution and ethic you are showing on behalf of CP..
seems like all the other higher members given all the responsibilities to you only.. 
|
|
|
|
|
This is not all about which responsibility given to whom, I think forum is total about solving the technical needs of user. Down-voting & up-voting is just kind of facility which is provided by CP not a bank account by which could make money.
Warm Regards
bjdestiny
"Affordable solutions for all your creativity needs."
|
|
|
|
|
That's what i am telling..when u are down voting state the proper reason so that we will come to know the mistake we are doing and will try to post better answers..
|
|
|
|
|
Snehasish_Nandy wrote: state the proper reason
Stated.
Snehasish_Nandy wrote: will try to post better answers.
Start posting better answers. I will gladly appreciate it for sure.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
Snehasish_Nandy wrote: seems like all the other higher members given all the responsibilities to you only
There is nothing like higher or lower here on Code project. Thumb rule is, play nice.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
Understand then..
next time on when you are down voting some one, give the reason and give a chance to improve others..
|
|
|
|
|
Last week I published a new article (Writing a Single-File Generator) and a new technical blog post (Grammars: theory vs. practice). Both of them showed up as "Updated" rather than "New". Actually I was going to post another new article on Saturday, but I postponed it until this week just in case it would help you test the fix for this issue that you are no doubt going to implement this week
|
|
|
|
|
|
That's great, thanks! What was the problem, does my username hash to zero or what?
|
|
|
|
|
A small code fix:
if (author == "Qwertie")
RandomiseEmailInsertion();
Once I commented that out it was all fine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you kindly for the report. All fixed.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refresh the page and force new downloads when you do it.
It's working fine for me and in the latest Chrome.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thx mate, you are a star 
|
|
|
|
|
I have just noticed that my article on the Coder with RasPi has different markup in the HTML code block section.
It appears that the website has fully qualified the CSS and JavaScript references in the example code. If you scroll down to the demo app first code block (HTML Subsection) you will see the 4x reference point back to CodeProject, i.e. everything before "/static...." has been added by the website and shouldn't be there.
Raspberry Pi - [Episode 3] Get Coding With Coder[^]
I haven't gone and edited it yet, thought you might want to see what is causing this to occur.
Edit (6th December): I updated the article and removed the stuff that the website had added, but it went and added back in on the LIVE published version, it doesn't show it up on the preview. I went back in to edit the article again, but the automatically added stuff doesn't show. Odd behaviour
modified 6-Dec-13 6:46am.
|
|
|
|
|
Bah. Dumb Bugs.
Getting information off the Internet is like taking a drink from a fire hydrant.
- Mitchell Kapor
|
|
|
|
|
Time zone (Moscow, Saint-Petersburg, Volgograd) is (GMT +4) now (not +3). Fix this bug in the Settings page, please.
Alex aka Slammy
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
