|
The answers were deleted, and I've updated the code so that you simply won't see them now.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Chris,
Thank you for answering and for the information. Perhaps it will be better decision compared to showing "deleted" status. After all, "deleted" must be "deleted", not looking like "disabled". I hope deleted comments will disappear from a page, right? The inability to remove them from view (in case of accidentally misplaced or wrong comments) clutters the page.
Thank you,
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
SAKryukov wrote: I hope deleted comments will disappear from a page, right?
Yes - that's the intention (though your own deleted items will still be visible)
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you, but why? Do you mean, if I've deleted my post, it's visible? Forever? Visible to me of or to others?
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
If you deleted your answer then you'll still see it. Other's won't.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you, Chris — for the information and for all this work you are doing. I can see many signs of improvement.
Best,
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
I observed same thing & reported too - below thread[^].
Reply from Chris to my report was not clear but after reading his reply to you, it is clear now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I see only solution 3, but with all options.
|
|
|
|
|
That question has been closed.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Closed as in deleted? If so, earlier when a question or answer was deleted, 'Deleted' with yellow background was visible making it clear enough. Has the implementation changed?
If closed is not deleted then it looks like this is a new state - how do we get to this state?
|
|
|
|
|
I do checked both options:
[x] Send me an e-mail if someone replies to the message
[x] Allow private email replies to the message
and the e-mails don't comming to me.
My e-mail box options:
[x] don't move [SPAM] into SPAM folder
[x] add [SPAM] to the header of message, when it is potentially SPAM
What should i do, if i want to get e-mails from codeproject?
I can only receive NewsLetter...
modified 8-May-12 15:42pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi losmac,
Thanks very much for your note. I have sent you an email confirmation address as well as email so we can explore solutions.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
Sean,
Thank you very much. I have got an email from you and email from forums@notifications.codeproject.com
I hope, it will help...
|
|
|
|
|
Still nothing
After confirmation e-mail address, i got a 5 comments to my QA.
Result... you know
|
|
|
|
|
I just wanted to check if the quite derisive and ridiculing questions here:
Another example of "Can't be bothered to do anything for myself"[^] [Edit]Link no longer valid. Question has been deleted.[/Edit]Homework style question[^] [Edit]Link no longer valid. Question has been deleted.[/Edit]
really called for this quite unprofessional behaviour. It seems to me that this member falsified OP's original question. This can no longer be checked as the versioning information link is no longer displayed. The author most likely to be accountable seems to be http://www.codeproject.com/Members/Pete-OHanlon[^].
Will somebody please look into the missing versioning link and this (perceived thus by me) abusive behaviour.
Regards,
Manfred
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine."
Ross Callon, The Twelve Networking Truths, RFC1925
modified 8-May-12 9:50am.
|
|
|
|
|
Looking into it now.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris - Manfred is right. I was unfairly harsh, and I am not happy with having added the comments there. If you could revert the messages to the original, that would be great (or open them up so I can revert them).
|
|
|
|
|
The versioning information is still missing from edited questions.
Is this intentional or are you the hamsters still working on it?
Cheers!
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine."
Ross Callon, The Twelve Networking Truths, RFC1925
modified 9-May-12 9:58am.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ahemm, and what do Article have to do with the questions in Q&A?
OK, just went back to double check and now I see them again for an answer that I edited just for that purpose. Does that mean I'll only see the version numbers when I also edited the question or did something just go haywire yesterday?
Anyhow, I'm glad it seems to be working again.
Thank you for your support and have a nice day!
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine."
Ross Callon, The Twelve Networking Truths, RFC1925
|
|
|
|
|
a) QA is piggy-backing off the article system (shhh!)
b) Yes, something went haywire yesterday.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine."
Ross Callon, The Twelve Networking Truths, RFC1925
|
|
|
|
|
While amusing, that commentary should go in a comment.
Editing a question to add 'GimmeCode' and 'Homework' tags is okay, though, right? I do that quite often as it appears to be the purpose of those tags.
|
|
|
|
|
BobJanova wrote: While amusing, that commentary should go in a comment
I guess this may have to do with the fact that commenting was broken in Q&A for a while today.
And yes it was sort of amusing reading the question, but it still is not OK to do so.
BobJanova wrote: Editing a question to add 'GimmeCode' and 'Homework' tags is okay, though,
right?
I wholeheartedly agree with that.
What really got to me was the seemingly obvious derisive and ridiculing tone in which the question seems to have been rewritten.
I wasn't sure if OP would have phrased somthing like that. Alas couldn't check it as the link with the version information was not there.
I don't think that it is OK to falsify a question in such a manner. (The tagging is OK though)
Regards,
Manfred
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine."
Ross Callon, The Twelve Networking Truths, RFC1925
|
|
|
|