15,890,438 members
Sign in
Sign in
Email
Password
Forgot your password?
Sign in with
home
articles
Browse Topics
>
Latest Articles
Top Articles
Posting/Update Guidelines
Article Help Forum
Submit an article or tip
Import GitHub Project
Import your Blog
quick answers
Q&A
Ask a Question
View Unanswered Questions
View All Questions
View C# questions
View C++ questions
View Javascript questions
View Visual Basic questions
View Python questions
discussions
forums
CodeProject.AI Server
All Message Boards...
Application Lifecycle
>
Running a Business
Sales / Marketing
Collaboration / Beta Testing
Work Issues
Design and Architecture
Artificial Intelligence
ASP.NET
JavaScript
Internet of Things
C / C++ / MFC
>
ATL / WTL / STL
Managed C++/CLI
C#
Free Tools
Objective-C and Swift
Database
Hardware & Devices
>
System Admin
Hosting and Servers
Java
Linux Programming
Python
.NET (Core and Framework)
Android
iOS
Mobile
WPF
Visual Basic
Web Development
Site Bugs / Suggestions
Spam and Abuse Watch
features
features
Competitions
News
The Insider Newsletter
The Daily Build Newsletter
Newsletter archive
Surveys
CodeProject Stuff
community
lounge
Who's Who
Most Valuable Professionals
The Lounge
The CodeProject Blog
Where I Am: Member Photos
The Insider News
The Weird & The Wonderful
help
?
What is 'CodeProject'?
General FAQ
Ask a Question
Bugs and Suggestions
Article Help Forum
About Us
Search within:
Articles
Quick Answers
Messages
Comments by Reto Ravasio (Top 8 by date)
Reto Ravasio
22-Oct-11 3:52am
View
you're right, but the code above could be used to send ctrl-A, ctrl-C to the application. This might work for some applications.
Reto Ravasio
13-Oct-11 19:19pm
View
Deleted
I think the functions name is wrong. It's not returning an open port, the function is returning the first free port from a given range and should be named accordingly.
Reto Ravasio
13-Oct-11 8:57am
View
Deleted
why not use explorer?
Reto Ravasio
11-Oct-11 15:27pm
View
Deleted
You're right that it compiles but what would you do with the old method? If you leave it, intelisense will show you two methods and when you remove it it could be considered a breaking change because without the new namespace old code will not compile. I'm sure they had some discussions about this at Microsoft before they released .NET3.5. Whichever way they decide, there are always people not happy with the outcome. Overall I think they did an excellent job with the BCL.
Reto Ravasio
8-Oct-11 4:45am
View
Deleted
I agree but how could they have prevented that situation? Lists ForEach was introduced in .NET2 while all the Linq stuff came much later in 3.5.
Reto Ravasio
8-Oct-11 4:22am
View
Deleted
Actually the original version should be around ~156 characters because the two template arguments <student> are not needed.
Reto Ravasio
31-Aug-11 17:42pm
View
Deleted
thanks, appreciate that
Reto Ravasio
28-Aug-11 3:14am
View
VS2010 uses C#4 by default but you can tell it to use another version. (Properties/Application/Target framework)
Show More