15,886,840 members
Sign in
Sign in
Email
Password
Forgot your password?
Sign in with
home
articles
Browse Topics
>
Latest Articles
Top Articles
Posting/Update Guidelines
Article Help Forum
Submit an article or tip
Import GitHub Project
Import your Blog
quick answers
Q&A
Ask a Question
View Unanswered Questions
View All Questions
View C# questions
View C++ questions
View Javascript questions
View Visual Basic questions
View Python questions
discussions
forums
CodeProject.AI Server
All Message Boards...
Application Lifecycle
>
Running a Business
Sales / Marketing
Collaboration / Beta Testing
Work Issues
Design and Architecture
Artificial Intelligence
ASP.NET
JavaScript
Internet of Things
C / C++ / MFC
>
ATL / WTL / STL
Managed C++/CLI
C#
Free Tools
Objective-C and Swift
Database
Hardware & Devices
>
System Admin
Hosting and Servers
Java
Linux Programming
Python
.NET (Core and Framework)
Android
iOS
Mobile
WPF
Visual Basic
Web Development
Site Bugs / Suggestions
Spam and Abuse Watch
features
features
Competitions
News
The Insider Newsletter
The Daily Build Newsletter
Newsletter archive
Surveys
CodeProject Stuff
community
lounge
Who's Who
Most Valuable Professionals
The Lounge
The CodeProject Blog
Where I Am: Member Photos
The Insider News
The Weird & The Wonderful
help
?
What is 'CodeProject'?
General FAQ
Ask a Question
Bugs and Suggestions
Article Help Forum
About Us
Search within:
Articles
Quick Answers
Messages
Comments by essence (Top 2 by date)
essence
5-Feb-13 19:42pm
View
So I just confirmed that when using QueuedTaskScheduler the value of "Current Queue Length" in Performance Monitor shows permanently higher than zero.
In this case, I used a maximum concurrency of 8 and the "Current Queue Length" never dropped below 24. Curiously enough, in my test, I statically included the class, but I never actually queued any tasks!
essence
5-Feb-13 19:21pm
View
I used QueuedTaskScheduler and it looks like it's very good.
But it seemed strange to me. Also, when implemented, I saw that it reserved threads as if it was its own thread pool. Then reguardless of running or not, the "Current Queue Length" was permanently raised when reviewing Performance Monitor. :(
I will try again using it. But the next thing I wanted was if the incoming flow of tasks reaches a limit, put the queuing thread on hold until there is enough slots to allow it. Otherwise you could progressively run out of memory depending on what your are trying to do.
Thank you very much for your response.