Comments by Mikael Segerstein

Mikael Segerstein 19-Apr-12 17:52pm View

The solution was also found in one of the links you sent so thank you for pointing them out.

Mikael Segerstein 19-Apr-12 17:49pm View

I have been doing some test with your suggestion and I belive I can make this work. It is not totally accurate but it will be a big improvment.
Thanks.

Mikael Segerstein 19-Apr-12 17:43pm View

No, I don't. If I do, the media transfer is slowed down.
Can't use Sleep(), not even with lower values like you suggest. It can still wake up after 50 ms or so.

Mikael Segerstein 19-Apr-12 10:29am View

Thanks for the links, I'll have a look at them.
Thank you for your effort.

Mikael Segerstein 19-Apr-12 10:19am View

Your assumption that it is Windows is correct, I have updated the tags, thanks for pointing it out. The solution I have now is working surprisingly well but since it it using way to much cpu, I can not have as many simultaneous thread as I would like.

Mikael Segerstein 19-Apr-12 8:53am View

Thanks for your suggesion. It will still not work, sending the next packet to soon will flood the receiving buffer on the receiving part, I need a short delay. The receiving part is usually a softphone or asterix switch.

Comments by Mikael Segerstein (Top 6 by date)