15,892,809 members
Sign in
Sign in
Email
Password
Forgot your password?
Sign in with
home
articles
Browse Topics
>
Latest Articles
Top Articles
Posting/Update Guidelines
Article Help Forum
Submit an article or tip
Import GitHub Project
Import your Blog
quick answers
Q&A
Ask a Question
View Unanswered Questions
View All Questions
View C# questions
View C++ questions
View Javascript questions
View Visual Basic questions
View Python questions
discussions
forums
CodeProject.AI Server
All Message Boards...
Application Lifecycle
>
Running a Business
Sales / Marketing
Collaboration / Beta Testing
Work Issues
Design and Architecture
Artificial Intelligence
ASP.NET
JavaScript
Internet of Things
C / C++ / MFC
>
ATL / WTL / STL
Managed C++/CLI
C#
Free Tools
Objective-C and Swift
Database
Hardware & Devices
>
System Admin
Hosting and Servers
Java
Linux Programming
Python
.NET (Core and Framework)
Android
iOS
Mobile
WPF
Visual Basic
Web Development
Site Bugs / Suggestions
Spam and Abuse Watch
features
features
Competitions
News
The Insider Newsletter
The Daily Build Newsletter
Newsletter archive
Surveys
CodeProject Stuff
community
lounge
Who's Who
Most Valuable Professionals
The Lounge
The CodeProject Blog
Where I Am: Member Photos
The Insider News
The Weird & The Wonderful
help
?
What is 'CodeProject'?
General FAQ
Ask a Question
Bugs and Suggestions
Article Help Forum
About Us
Search within:
Articles
Quick Answers
Messages
Comments by brianriggan (Top 11 by date)
brianriggan
15-Dec-14 12:37pm
View
It does not always return 0 rows.. I was just using that as an example because usually slowness comes from the number of rows returned.. in this case the slowness is being caused by something else.
brianriggan
15-Dec-14 11:51am
View
The table is indexed as it should be.
About 300,000...
There are not partitions this is a subject I am not very familiar with.. We do not have a "real" dba so I think this might be a configuration issue that has not been addressed. Also the number of fields are a requirement in this case... Another part of this puzzle.. The query is a parameterized string the query executes sub second very fast in SQL management studio but takes a full second to execute the same query using a data reader in C#.
brianriggan
15-Dec-14 11:46am
View
The problem is that I do need all of the columns, I have slimmed down the result set as much as possible the original author was using SELECT * I am only getting what is needed... I just need a large number of rows. Is there a setting in SQL server so that I could increase the memory used for a query or something?
brianriggan
18-Nov-14 16:49pm
View
Cannot view this at work will try and look tonight sorry.
brianriggan
18-Nov-14 16:38pm
View
You know I have not ever actually done so. I would assume you could post a link to one of the free image sharing sites might want to get an admins input on that though. I have been a creeper for years but rarely ever posted.
brianriggan
18-Nov-14 16:22pm
View
Unplug the machine take it outside and throw it on the ground. Just kidding can you post a screenshot of the error? (Referring to posting a screenshot of whatever is telling you that it is corrupted.)
brianriggan
18-Nov-14 15:51pm
View
Yes not the entire thing just what you suspect is causing the error.
brianriggan
18-Nov-14 15:30pm
View
I do not believe that Windows 7 has smart screen so that is not it. I think that tgrt was correct in his assertion that it is a Malware/Antivirus issue. Try enabling logging when you run the install then examining/posting the error from the log file.
brianriggan
18-Nov-14 15:16pm
View
Probably not the issue I am thinking of but I had problems when "Smart Screen" was enabled but that was on a Windows 8.1 machine.
brianriggan
18-Nov-14 14:40pm
View
I agree this is similar to what I was seeing running windows 8.1 with the "smart shield" enabled.
brianriggan
18-Nov-14 14:37pm
View
What OS are you running?
Show More