15,895,822 members
Sign in
Sign in
Email
Password
Forgot your password?
Sign in with
home
articles
Browse Topics
>
Latest Articles
Top Articles
Posting/Update Guidelines
Article Help Forum
Submit an article or tip
Import GitHub Project
Import your Blog
quick answers
Q&A
Ask a Question
View Unanswered Questions
View All Questions
View C# questions
View C++ questions
View Javascript questions
View Visual Basic questions
View Python questions
discussions
forums
CodeProject.AI Server
All Message Boards...
Application Lifecycle
>
Running a Business
Sales / Marketing
Collaboration / Beta Testing
Work Issues
Design and Architecture
Artificial Intelligence
ASP.NET
JavaScript
Internet of Things
C / C++ / MFC
>
ATL / WTL / STL
Managed C++/CLI
C#
Free Tools
Objective-C and Swift
Database
Hardware & Devices
>
System Admin
Hosting and Servers
Java
Linux Programming
Python
.NET (Core and Framework)
Android
iOS
Mobile
WPF
Visual Basic
Web Development
Site Bugs / Suggestions
Spam and Abuse Watch
features
features
Competitions
News
The Insider Newsletter
The Daily Build Newsletter
Newsletter archive
Surveys
CodeProject Stuff
community
lounge
Who's Who
Most Valuable Professionals
The Lounge
The CodeProject Blog
Where I Am: Member Photos
The Insider News
The Weird & The Wonderful
help
?
What is 'CodeProject'?
General FAQ
Ask a Question
Bugs and Suggestions
Article Help Forum
About Us
Search within:
Articles
Quick Answers
Messages
Comments by LostTheMarbles (Top 9 by date)
LostTheMarbles
2-Sep-14 5:46am
View
Reason for my vote of 1 \n The code is a mess and isn't commented, it really needs cleaning up and explaining properly to make it understandable or useful.
LostTheMarbles
17-Jul-14 9:24am
View
Reason for my vote of 5 \n Useful information and clearly presented. Thanks
LostTheMarbles
23-Jun-14 6:01am
View
Reason for my vote of 4 \n Nice article but one question:
allWords is defined in the using block so drops out of scope once that block is completed, why not store the list of words somewhere so it can be used multiple times.
I'd also do as little work as possible within that using block, it's only really there to protect the reader.
LostTheMarbles
16-Jun-14 8:48am
View
Reason for my vote of 1 \n As far as I can see:
There's no useful information in this post, you don't explain what you're trying to do, you don't explain how you're doing things, there're no visible results we can use to verify your results.
LostTheMarbles
3-Jun-14 4:04am
View
Reason for my vote of 3 \n It'd be nice if you covered why this is necessary and maybe explain the code sample a little more.
What makes the method an extension method etc.
LostTheMarbles
28-Apr-14 5:46am
View
Reason for my vote of 4 \n The sample IPV4 address is invalid :p
Otherwise, an interesting introduction, it'd be interesting to hear more about what the code's actually doing.
LostTheMarbles
24-Apr-14 4:27am
View
Reason for my vote of 5 \n Clear and precise.
Thanks.
LostTheMarbles
22-Apr-14 10:31am
View
Reason for my vote of 2 \n This article doesn't say anything about the approach to solving the problem, it just gives a chunk of difficult to follow code, reading through it I can't even tell if it really works.
In truth, I think there's quite a simple recursive approach to solving this problem, maybe see if you can work it out?
LostTheMarbles
22-Apr-14 10:24am
View
Reason for my vote of 2 \n No real useful content here, article could be written in 1-2 lines.
Show More